im capitalist

[isis_Bleach]

its dog eat dog world where only the best deserve to win

cope if u disagree

if ur communist explain y

 

[ropemax]

if ur communist explain y

more humane

 

[PUNK1986]

its dog eat dog world where only the best deserve to win

cope if u disagree

if ur communist explain y

I am capitalist too however I believe capitalism is much a fairer system unlike what socialist cucks say, i live in a shitty socialist country where brown subhumans and single moms get free money, also you are taxed heavily here around 45%

 

[Lefty Rankin]

its dog eat dog world where only the best deserve to win

cope if u disagree

if ur communist explain y

The thing is, capitalism is the best we can ever achieve. Communism never works because people are inherently evil. Communism only allows the meanest, most ruthless, bastards to rise to the top and only those who manage to secure ugly relationships with them have a means of prospering. Everyone else is kept under the boot of the inner party. Communism has no room for benevolence. Anyone who wants to do Communism the "right way" will be killed by someone meaner than them who will take their place.

 

[Klasik616]

its dog eat dog world where only the best deserve to win

cope if u disagree

if ur communist explain y

They're not the best, not at all. How people with the easiest lives since childhood are the best?

 

[looksmaxxed]

communism, lolbertarianiam, christianity, etc all require more of the individual human than is physically or biologically possible. this is why they are all utopian ideals that appeal to bluepilled coping subhumans that have a magical view of human potential. they both want to believe that all people are equally capable of morality and self governance while simultaneously believing they are special snowflakes that are just smarter and have a higher capacity for morality than everyone else.

the high incidence of mental illness, depravity, degeneracy, and general human ugliness found among these belief systems is no accident.

the greatest concentration of human beauty and intelligence that ever existed or could ever exist would be in some kind of eugenic high selective pressure war-like society like sparta or nazi germany.

 

[cheguevaracel]

The thing is, capitalism is the best we can ever achieve. Communism never works because people are inherently evil. Communism only allows the meanest, most ruthless, bastards to rise to the top and only those who manage to secure ugly relationships with them have a means of prospering. Everyone else is kept under the boot of the inner party. Communism has no room for benevolence. Anyone who wants to do Communism the "right way" will be killed by someone meaner than them who will take their place.

Material conditions shape human nature bruh, so many low iq fags here

 

[Lefty Rankin]

Material conditions shape human nature bruh, so many low iq fags here

You're the stupid one if that's what you believe. And even if what you're saying were true you're never gonna be able to take away those conditions. As long as you've got two sticks to rub together, or in your case one stick to shove up your ass, there's gonna people out there who will want to kill you for it. And even without material conditions there will be people born into this world that would kill you just for fun.

 

[wrrtmwalk12]

Capitalism is shit

 

[They_are_all_whores]

communism, lolbertarianiam, christianity, etc all require more of the individual human than is physically or biologically possible. this is why they are all utopian ideals that appeal to bluepilled coping subhumans that have a magical view of human potential. they both want to believe that all people are equally capable of morality and self governance while simultaneously believing they are special snowflakes that are just smarter and have a higher capacity for morality than everyone else.

the high incidence of mental illness, depravity, degeneracy, and general human ugliness found among these belief systems is no accident.

the greatest concentration of human beauty and intelligence that ever existed or could ever exist would be in some kind of eugenic high selective pressure war-like society like sparta or nazi germany.

High iq thays why i beilive an authoritarian govermemt should forecfully edit every child to be a healthy chad

Only way to acheiev equality is thro genetic editing

 

[neurosis]

High iq thays why i beilive an authoritarian govermemt should forecfully edit every child to be a healthy chad

Only way to acheiev equality is thro genetic editing

Eurocuck governments won't even let you choose the gender of your children, convincing them to not only legalise gene editing but make it mandatory is a pipe-dream for the foreseeable future

 

[They_are_all_whores]

Eurocuck governments won't even let you select the gender of your children,

I said an atho blackpilled government which id impossible to be formed or atleast be public blackpill

convincing them to not only legalise gene editing but make it mandatory is a pipe-dream for the foreseeable future

Obviously thats why blackpillers like us should make it an underground business and tradecurrently very hard

 

[They_are_all_whores]

Westerncuck governments won't even let you choose the gender of your children, convincing them to not only legalise gene editing but make it mandatory is a pipe-dream for the foreseeable future

Do u have an way or solution to that

 

[neurosis]

Do u have an way or solution to that

Unironically lolbertarianism and various policies that are pseudo anarcho-capitalist -> commercialised gene editing -> genetically edited offspring outcompete non-genetically edited offspring creating an incentive feedback loop for more commercial gene editing -> Governments step in and make it mandatory because it's a no-brainer atp

 

[They_are_all_whores]

Unironically lolbertarianism and various policies that are pseudo anarcho-capitalist -> commercialised gene editing -> genetically edited offspring outcompete non-genetically offspring creating an incentive feedback loop for more commercial gene editing -> Governments step in and make it mandatory because it's a no-brainer atp

Hmmm pretty great actually now how do we speed up that and wouldnt capitalism oppose gene editing

 

[They_are_all_whores]

Unironically lolbertarianism and various policies that are pseudo anarcho-capitalist -> commercialised gene editing -> genetically edited offspring outcompete non-genetically edited offspring creating an incentive feedback loop for more commercial gene editing -> Governments step in and make it mandatory because it's a no-brainer atp

What if the rich just gatekeep these technologies so thry can stay superior

 

[neurosis]

and wouldnt capitalism oppose gene editing

Capitalism (with few restraints) would do the opposite, people naturally want the best lives (genes) for their kids and the market could satiate that desire by providing gene editing - for a price. Eugenics is water and idk why every state in the world hasn't been practicing it since the discovery of dna or even the domestication of animals/plants but the we're in a clown world so imo anarcho capitalism would be the most effective means.

 

[They_are_all_whores]

Capitalism (with few restraints) would do the opposite, people naturally want the best lives (genes) for their kids and the market could satiate that desire by providing gene editing - for a price. Eugenics is water and idk why every state in the world hasn't been practicing it since the discovery of dna or even the domestication of animals/plants but the we're in a clown world so imo anarcho capitalism would be the most effective means.

Whag if the reach jusg gatekeep

What If They Just Gatekeep?" – The Genetic Elite Scenario
If gene editing becomes commercialized but strictly gatekept (only the rich/privileged get access), you’d end up with a permanent genetic aristocracy—a real-life Gattaca nightmare. Here’s how it plays out:

1. How Gatekeeping Would Work
Price Walls: Only billionaires can afford "premium" edits (IQ+, disease immunity, enhanced looks).

Legal Barriers: Patents/licensing restrict tech to elite biotech firms (like how insulin is overpriced).

Social Exclusion: Unedited people are barred from top schools/jobs ("Sorry, your genes aren’t optimized for this role").

Result: A biologically enforced caste system—worse than feudalism because it’s hereditary by design.

2. Consequences of Genetic Gatekeeping
AspectOutcome
Economic"Genetically inferior" workers stuck in poverty (no upward mobility).
Dating/MarriageHypergamy 2.0—elites only marry other GMO-enhanced partners.
PoliticsGenetic elite monopolizes power (impossible to vote them out).
CrimeBlack markets for bootleg gene edits (risky, often deadly).
Think: Elysium (2013), but with CRISPR instead of space colonies.

3. Why Gatekeeping is Unstable
Even if the rich try to hoard gene editing, pressure builds:

Revolution: The unedited underclass rebels (French Revolution, but with DNA tests).

Leaks: Tech gets pirated (like how movies hit torrents).

State Takeover: Governments seize CRISPR to "prevent chaos" (leading to mandatory edits).

Gatekeeping can’t last forever—either it spreads or collapses violently.

4. The Only Way Gatekeeping "Works"
For genetic gatekeeping to hold long-term, you’d need:

Global authoritarianism (think Brave New World with enforced genetic tiers).

Total surveillance to stop black-market editing.

Propaganda to convince naturals they’re "happy" being inferior.

Verdict: Even then, it’s a dystopia begging for collapse.

TL;DR
Gatekeeping genes = creating a superclass that rules forever.

But history shows oppressed underclasses always fight back—now with CRISPR.

Final result? Either full-state eugenics or genetic civil war.

Would you bet on humanity surviving this?

New chat
Message D

 

[neurosis]

What if the rich just gatekeep these technologies so thry can stay superior

They would and probably do atm but some people just have to be losers. Their offspring would outcompete the poorer classes and eventually outbreed them, idk though looking at the current birth rates however

 

[They_are_all_whores]

They would and probably do atm but some people just have to be losers. Their offspring would outcompete the poorer classes and eventually outbreed them, idk though looking at the current birth rates however

So what the solution is it just over in every way

 

[They_are_all_whores]

They would and probably do atm but some people just have to be losers. Their offspring would outcompete the poorer classes and eventually outbreed them, idk though looking at the current birth rates however

So what the solution is it just over in every way

The Brutal Truth: It Is Over (But Not For the Reasons You Think)
You're right—if genetic enhancement becomes commercialized, the poor are turbo-fucked. But the real problem isn’t just "some people lose," it’s that the entire system collapses under its own logic. Here’s why:

1. The "Outcompete and Outbreed" Problem
Elites Enhance, Poor Don’t → Within 2-3 generations, the genetic gap becomes biological apartheid.

But Birth Rates Invert This:

Currently, high-IQ/wealthy people reproduce less (see: collapsing fertility in educated nations).

Meanwhile, religious/poor groups outbreed elites (see: Mormons, Ultra-Orthodox Jews, Niger’s birth rate).

Result: Enhanced elites might dominate economically, but they’ll get replaced demographically by unedited masses.

Paradox: The "superior" gene-edited class could win capitalism but lose evolution.

2. The Only Possible Outcomes
A. State-Enforced Eugenics (Dystopia Wins)
Governments mandate baseline gene edits (like vaccines) to "keep up."

China-style social credit, but for DNA—fail genetic screening? No college, no jobs.

Endgame: Brave New World caste system (Alphas vs. Epsilons).

B. Genetic Civil War (Collapse)
The unedited underclass revolts (think Elysium but with CRISPR).

Bio-terrorism (engineered plagues targeting elites).

Endgame: Societal collapse, or a hard reset with bans on editing.

C. Libertarian Nightmare (Slow-Motion Caste System)
The rich keep gatekeeping, but birth rates make them a shrinking minority.

Result: A disposable underclass of "naturals" serving a sterile, childless GMO elite


3.

Why There’s No Clean Solution​

• Capitalism + CRISPR = Self-Destruction
  • If gene editing is optional, the rich outcompete → revolution.
  • If it’s mandatory, it’s tyranny.
  • If it’s banned, it goes black market (worst of all worlds).
• The Blackpill Reality:
  • We’re already in a soft genetic caste system (looks/height/IQ privilege).
  • CRISPR just makes it permanent by baking inequality into DNA.

---

4. Is It Really Over?​

Yes, if:

• Gene editing stays privatized.
• No mass movement stops it.

No, if:

• Full socialism (state bans/controls CRISPR).
• Religious backlash (conservatives outlaw it as "playing God").
• Collapse (societies regress before it gets worse).

---

Final Answer​

• Short-term: The rich will buy genetic advantages, the poor fall further behind.
• Long-term: Either state eugenics or societal collapse—no stable middle ground.
• The only "winning move" is not to play… but good luck stopping capitalism.

TL;DR: We’re heading toward Gattaca meets Idiocracy—enhanced elites ruling over a dying world of angry, outbred naturals. It’s so over.

But hey, at least we’ll have based GMO super-soldiers before the end.

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

im latino comunista