IM SORRY IM GOING TO HAVE TO DO THIS, BUT THIS APPARENTLY NEEDS TO BE SAID AGAIN:

CFW432

CFW432

ABOS. MUST. DIE.
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Posts
13,295
Reputation
18,454
After getting some pushback from some delusional ethnics on here (especially from some hindus) about the inferiority of ethnic looks and genes, im afraid im going to have to post this thread, that i posted way back in July of last year. Maybe after going through this thread A 2ND TIME, you will get in your thick ethnic skulls that ethnic features are indeed inferior and that Caucasian features are the most superior. It is with a heavy heart that i do this:



PROOF THAT CAUCASOID FEATURES AND LIGHTER SKIN WERE DESIRABLE BEFORE COLONIALISM.​





Lightskinned/whiteskinned caucasoid features have been the ideal of beauty and source of supremacy long before european colonialism happened during the middle ages/ renaissance, and im literally about to give you coping shitskins tons of examples to prove it, hopefully after taking this massive blackpill suppository that i rape right into your asses you will stop deluding yourselves, and learn to live in the real world without coping.

*ahem*

First Curries:

https://www.researchgate.net/public...or_and_Caste_Discrimination_in_Indian_Society

"Last Version: Color and Caste Discrimination The belief in Aryan racial supremacy dominates social hierarchy practices in India. Upper caste members claim a superior lineage by tracing their “genes” to Aryans, connoting a “natural superiority” over “Shudra” and “ex-untouchables.” (The term “ex-untouchables” refers to Scheduled Castes, also known as Avarna (outside four Varna), Outcastes, Panchama, Antyaja, etc.) This chapter uses terms such as Dalits, ex-untouchables interchangeably, to refer to this population, though the socio-legal term defined to this population is Scheduled Castes—deemed as non-Aryans. Aryans textually are described as a pure, noble, and superior race: physically tall, with sharp noses and lighter skin color. Dasyus or Dasas, on the contrary, are considered of lowly origin and racially inferior due to their dark skin. Such stratification based on skin color is perhaps one of the oldest forms of discrimination and domination in human society. India has a 3,000-year-old social hierarchal system rooted in the “varna-jāti” structure. Jāti, or caste system, is a socioreligious organization prescribing restricted commensality, endogamy, practices of untouchability, and other regressive practices. This ancient hierarchy affects, in particular, the rules of dining, endogamy, and caste commensality. Social life is marked by hierarchal practices and other dogmatic beliefs operated through exercising strict control over women and her sexuality. In addition, the cultural complex of beauty, femininity, chastity, and social status is based on skin color and caste location. Lighter skin is considered superior, whereas dark-skinned is rendered as disability, ugly, and inferior. Skin color in thus many ways is marker of social status, inferiority intrinsic to dark skin color, and superiority associated with whiteness/lighter skin shades. This chapter attempts to map historical and contemporary form of color-based discrimination, history of racial discourse, and the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) in promoting and perpetuating color and caste-based discrimination."


www.abovetopsecret.com

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com
www.abovetopsecret.com


"...hadst pleasure in their lauds, O Indra golden-haired."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"O Surya with the golden-haired , ascend for us day after day."

-[Rig Veda 10]

"To him , Rudra the strong , great , fair-complexioned I utter forth a mighty hymn of praises".

- [Rig Veda 2]

"To her ...to this golden-locked Nirriti (goddess of misfortune), I have rendered obeisance."

"Indra , the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"with tawny hair, Savitr hath raised before"

- [Yajur Veda 4


These are all text worshipping the light hair and lighter complexion of the aryans, and there are plenty, plenty more, but i was just giving some. NOTE THIS EVEN FURTHER BLACKPILL: The indo-aryans were a majority lightskinned, BUT brunette hair, and brown/hazel eyed people. The fact that the rigvedic text loves to worship light eyes and light hair colors shows that white worshipping EVEN HAPPENED WITHIN ARYAN SOCIETY ITSELF. Basically, there are "whites among whites". if you catch my drift. The majority brunette haired and brown eyed aryans worshipped the minority light haired and light eyed aryans of their society and held them to be THEIR ideal standard of beauty LMFAO.
Now here are some quotes talking about how the aryans fought against the hate "dasyu"

"By slaying the Dasyus (natives), he [Indra] protected the Aryan color" LMFAO HOLY SHIT THIS IS LITERALLY SOMETHING OUT OF 1940S NAZI PROPAGANDA

- [Rig Veda 3]

"Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshipper, he subdued the lawless for Manu (Noah) , he conquered the black skin."

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 130.8 (I.CXXX.8)]


"the thunderer who bestowed on his white friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the waters." LITERALLY 1500 B.C. LEBENSRAUM LMFAO

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 100.18 (I.C.18)

"Thou to the son of Vidathin, Rjisvan, Thou smotest down the swarthy fifty thousand, and rentest forts as age consumes a garment."

- [Rig Veda , Indra - 4.16.13]


"Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the black skin far away."

- [Rig veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.41.1]



The sacrificer poured out thanks to his god for "scattering the slave bands of black descent", and for stamping out "the vile Dasyan colour."

- [ Rig Veda . II.20.7, II.12.4 ]


"O'er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates."

- [Rig Veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.73.5]



" Indra in battles help his Aryan worshipper, he who hath hundred helps at hand in every fray, in frays that win the light of heaven. Plaguing the lawless he gave up to Manu's seed the dusky skin; Blazing, 'twere, he burns each covetous man away, he burns, the tyrannous away."

- [Rig Veda , Book 1]

Lmao look at this lol, but ugly poopskin hindu dindus will continue to talk about "MUH BRITISH COLONIALISM CREATED MUH WHITE BEAUTY STANDARDS!" No it didnt you coping shitskin, no it didnt. Oh and btw, just a heads up, the rigveda was written somewhere from between 1500 B.C. to 1000 B.C.
en.wikipedia.org

Rigveda - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Now that we took care of curries lets head over to MENA. Lets be real here MENA worship white people and white passing arabs, but i dont feel arsed to look up 100 examples to prove this so ill just give you a few. Heres some:

sonsofvikings.com

Historic Arabic Accounts Describing Vikings

“I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms...
sonsofvikings.com
sonsofvikings.com

I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms we have mentioned. Their swords are broad-bladed and grooved like the Frankish ones. From the tips of his toes to his neck, each man is tattooed in dark green with designs and so forth. All their women wear on their bosoms circular brooches, made of iron, silver, copper, or gold according to their husbands’ wealth … around their necks each woman wears a torc of gold or silver, for each man as soon as he accumulates 10,000 dirhams has a torc made for his wife… every time he increases his wealth 10,000 he has another torc made for his wife, so one woman may wear many torcs.”

- Ahmed Ibn Fadlan (from Lunde and Stone, pp. 45-46).



www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland? - Medievalists.net

The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds.
www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland?​


"The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds. Like other luxury items, these slaves would be worth the cost of transporting them to far-away markets in Asia and the Mediterranean.
The article, ‘The Baltic Finnic People in the Medieval and Pre-Modern Eastern European Slave Trade’, by Professor Jukka Korpela of the University of Eastern Finland, appears in the latest issue of the journal Russian History.


Using chronicles, travelogues and various administrative documents such as tax and land registers, as well as diplomatic reports, he found that there was extensive raiding into parts of Finland, the Russian Karelia and the Baltic Countries during the late medieval and early modern periods, with thousands of persons kidnapped in the north. Only a fraction of them ended up in the Caspian Sea region and Central Asia via the Volgan and Crimean slave markets. Otherwise, slave trade in the Crimea and Volga regions was extensive, and tens of thousands of people were sold into slavery every year. However, the existence of the trade route shows that it was possible, even under primitive conditions, to distribute information about the demand for blonde girls in the far-away markets. The network of those involved in slave trade included men who participated in raids, slave traders and customers representing the leading class of society.

Raids into the north were launched especially from Novgorod, which was well connected to the Crimea and, from there on, to the Caspian Sea and the slave markets of Central Asia. Raids were done by private warlords and princely troops, and they extended all the way to the coasts of the Gulf of Bothnia and Lapland. For example, Korpela writes how:

The Novgorodian warlord Prokopii conquered the town of Kostroma in 1375, imprisoned many local men, women and girls and continued his raid along the Kama and Volga to the town of Bolghar, where the party sold all their Christian prisoners, “young girls and women,” to Moslem traders. Finally the gang proceeded to Astrakhan’, where they were executed, obviously as bandits, by Khan Salchei.


Finns were especially valuable on the slave trade market because they were neither Christian or Muslim, and because of their light skin colour. Korpela explains:

The most expensive slave on the Caffa register was a 14–year-old white boy referred to in the source text as “Jarcaxius” (“Circassian”?), who was sold for 750 aspers, and there were other slaves with good colour qualifications that seemed to carry an above-average price. One four-and-a-half-year-old Rus’ian “white” boy cost 185 aspers, although such young children were usually very cheap on account of their high mortality rate. “White” Saracen slaves were also overpriced in the Genoese registers, and blond boys and girls were expensive on the Italian markets, too.

The slave trade in Eastern Europe gradually faded, as the control exercised by the emerging structure of European states became stronger. The spreading of Christianity also caused a decline in slave trade during the medieval period. Slave trade within Europe declined already in the early medieval period, but in regions bordering on Islamic countries, slave trade continued up until the pre-modern period."



LMAO, IMAGINE GOING FROM THE MIDDLE EAST TO AS FAR NORTH AS NORTHERN FINLAND TO RAID AND CAPTURE A BUNCH OF FINNISH PEASANT CHILDREN, JUST BECAUSE YOU WORSHIP THEIR LOOKS THAT MUCH. THIS IS THE MIDDLE AGES BTW, THERE IS NO AIRPLANES THAT CAN TRAVEL FROM ONE SIDE OF THE WORLD TO THE OTHER IN A FEW HOURS. THIS TRIP WOULD'VE TAKEN WEEKS, IF NOT A FEW MONTHS OF TRAVELING AND BRAVING HOSTILE BANDIT INFESTED DIRT ROADS. IMAGINE TRAVELING FOR WEEKS/MONTHS ON END TO BRAVE ALL SORTS OF DANGERS, JUST TO GET AT THAT BLONDE JB FINNISH PUSSY LMFAO.



On to the Turks: There are some accounts of colorism within ottoman history, not really amongst the turks themselves, cause they were all more or less light skinned really, but there is colorism based on how they treated other races, from worshipping other races they percieved to be closer to their ideal standard of beauty, to putting down those races who they deemed to be further away from their ideal standard of beauty.


en.wikipedia.org

Slavery in the Ottoman Empire - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
In the Ottoman empire, female slaves owned by men were sexually available to their masters, and their children were considered as legitimate as any child born of a free woman, however female slaves owned by women could not be available to their masters' husband by law.[53] This means that any child of a female slave could not be sold or given away. However, due to extreme poverty, some Circassian slaves and free people in the lower classes of Ottoman society felt forced to sell their children into slavery; this provided a potential benefit for the children as well, as slavery also held the opportunity for social mobility.[54] If a harem slave became pregnant, it also became illegal for her to be further sold in slavery, and she would gain her freedom upon her current owner's death.[54] Slavery in and of itself was long tied with the economic and expansionist activities of the Ottoman empire.[55] There was a major decrease in slave acquisition by the late eighteenth century as a result of the lessening of expansionist activities.[55] War efforts were a great source of slave procurement, so the Ottoman empire had to find other methods of obtaining slaves because they were a major source of income within the empire.[55] The Caucasian War caused a major influx of Circassian slaves into the Ottoman market and a person of modest wealth could purchase a slave with a few pieces of gold.[55] At a time, Circassian slaves became the most abundant in the imperial harem.[55]

Circassians, Syrians, and Nubians were the three primary races of females who were sold as sex slaves (Cariye) in the Ottoman Empire.[6] Circassian girls were described as fair and light-skinned and were frequently enslaved by Crimean Tatars then sold to Ottoman Empire to live and serve in a Harem (basically sex slaves for high status officials and the sultan).[6] They were the most expensive, reaching up to 500 pounds sterling, and the most popular with the Turks. Second in popularity were Syrian girls, which came largely from coastal regions in Anatolia.[6] Their price could reach up to 30 pounds sterling. Nubian girls were the cheapest and least popular, fetching up to 20 pounds sterling (lmfao black foids blown the fuck out lmao) :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:. [6] Sex roles and symbolism in Ottoman society functioned as a normal action of power. The palace Harem excluded enslaved women from the rest of society.[46]

en.wikipedia.org

Ottoman Imperial Harem - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
For the perpetuation and service of the Ottoman dynasty, slave girls were either captured in war, given as gifts to the Sultan and the dynastic family on special occasions, recruited within the empire, or procured from neighbouring countries to become imperial court ladies (cariyes). The number of female slaves within the harem varied over time, and the harem itself was regularly renewed as a result of the practice of manumission. Manumission of the previous sultan’s concubines was especially common upon the enthronement of a new sultan. Most enslaved girls were Christian, and came from various countries, regions, and ethnic groups, including Circassia, Georgia, Russia, and Africa.[20] There was no standard practice that determined what age girls entered the harem. Some arrived as children, while others entered at a later age. This slave trade was formally banned in 1854 but the ban was on paper only.[21] After 1854, almost all court lady-slaves were of Circassian origin; the Circassians had been expelled from Russian lands in the 1860s and the improverished refugee parents sold their daughters in a trade that was formally banned but tolerated.[21]

Basically only lightskinned/whiteskinned foids could be apart of the the imperial harem (for the sultan), no blacks allowed :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:









Now on to hispanics :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile:

I mean lmfao, what is there to say, everyone knows that in hispanic society, the whiter more european looking you look, the closer to the ideal standard of beauty you are, and the browner, and more native you look, or the blacker and more african you look, the further away from the ideal standard beauty you are, and the more uglier you are percieved. Im sure there are tons of literary examples that show white worshipping in hispanic society, but tbh i feel lazy now, so instead ill just post this one link, and the image of this painting. I feel like they should be good enough to give you an idea of how shit goes on around there.



en.wikipedia.org

Blanqueamiento - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Redeno





https://www.medievalists.net/2014/04/17/medieval-slave-traders-go-finland/finland/
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: sayi, Epola, Steel and 16 others
Read it all.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ominion
Only really applies to caucasoid influenced peoples

Japs genocided the ainu and the Chinese assimilated the Dongyi.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, Funnyunenjoyer1, hallo and 2 others
It's all due to Caucasian feuteurs being widespread in the world, back then it is sort of rariety thingy, that's why ethnic foids are cheaper than that of white foids.

Chinks find them repulsive back then.

"if Chinese persons do not wish to marry Qincha [Kipchak] ..., the latter may marry among their own race ... Kipchaks have light hair and blue eyes. Their appearance is vile and peculiar, so there are those who do not wish to marry them. — (Da Ming lü jijie fuli 6.36b)"

Also, Sand Nigger merchants who were trading along the lower Volga with Vikings coming from the Baltic found these "aryan gods" repulsive and dirty. One of them wrote:

They are the filthiest of all Allah’s creatures: they do not purify themselves after excreting or urinating or wash themselves when in a state of ritual impurity after coitus and do not even wash their hands after food.

Hindu gods dipiction-

Krishna is represented in the Indian traditions in many ways, but with some common features. His iconography typically depicts him with black, dark, or blue skin, like Vishnu.


You are selfhating curry, just kys:forcedsmile:
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Mog3D and Deleted member 65208
This is beautiful. A super raw blackpill, thank u for sharing,
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: sayi, Epola, Steel and 1 other person
It's all due to Caucasian feuteurs being widespread in the world, back then it is sort of rariety thingy, that's why ethnic foids are cheaper than that of white foids.
Ok so if its a widespread thing nowadays shouldnt people want ethnic features more by your logic.
They are the filthiest of all Allah’s creatures: they do not purify themselves after excreting or urinating or wash themselves when in a state of ritual impurity after coitus and do not even wash their hands after food.
This is because Europeans didnt wash themselves, Muslims wash their extremities 5 times a day before they pray. This isnt about white lookz
 
  • +1
Reactions: Epola and mvp2v1
It's all due to Caucasian feuteurs being widespread in the world, back then it is sort of rariety thingy, that's why ethnic foids are cheaper than that of white foids.

Chinks find them repulsive back then.

"if Chinese persons do not wish to marry Qincha [Kipchak] ..., the latter may marry among their own race ... Kipchaks have light hair and blue eyes. Their appearance is vile and peculiar, so there are those who do not wish to marry them. — (Da Ming lü jijie fuli 6.36b)"

Also, Sand Nigger merchants who were trading along the lower Volga with Vikings coming from the Baltic found these "aryan gods" repulsive and dirty. One of them wrote:

They are the filthiest of all Allah’s creatures: they do not purify themselves after excreting or urinating or wash themselves when in a state of ritual impurity after coitus and do not even wash their hands after food.

Hindu gods dipiction-

Krishna is represented in the Indian traditions in many ways, but with some common features. His iconography typically depicts him with black, dark, or blue skin, like Vishnu.


You are selfhating curry, just kys:forcedsmile:
It's all due to Caucasian feuteurs being widespread in the world, back then it is sort of rariety thingy, that's why ethnic foids are cheaper than that of white foids.'
WRONG. Cacausian features unironically have been the the most widespread facial features compared to non-caucasian facial features because the populations that had them have been the most populous populations in the world. The most widespread populations of the ancient world were middle eastern farmers, who were caucasoid peoples, who then spread throughout the world to europe and to central and south asia and spread their features with the native non-caucasoid populations through mixing and conquering (yes farmers actually did conquer native hunter gatherer populations just like the indo europeans would conquer them thousands of years later.) Non-caucasoid populations tended to be the native hunter gatherer populations which always tended to be smaller and made up of a few thousands of people that lived in isolated tribes.





Chinks find them repulsive back then.

"if Chinese persons do not wish to marry Qincha [Kipchak] ..., the latter may marry among their own race ... Kipchaks have light hair and blue eyes. Their appearance is vile and peculiar, so there are those who do not wish to marry them. — (Da Ming lü jijie fuli 6.36b)"

Also, Sand Nigger merchants who were trading along the lower Volga with Vikings coming from the Baltic found these "aryan gods" repulsive and dirty. One of them wrote:

They are the filthiest of all Allah’s creatures: they do not purify themselves after excreting or urinating or wash themselves when in a state of ritual impurity after coitus and do not even wash their hands after food.


What does this have to do with looks lmao? Yes the nordics were filthy degens back then with barely any hygiene whatsoever lol, everyone knows this. This still didnt stop the arabs from seeing them as the tall, white skin nordic gods they were. Its the same for me. Aishwariya rai could literally drink a glass of cow piss and bathe in a tub of cow dung just like any other regular hindu, at the end of the day she's still a lightskin stacypreet with green eyes lol.

Hindu gods dipiction-
Krishna is represented in the Indian traditions in many ways, but with some common features. His iconography typically depicts him with black, dark, or blue skin, like Vishnu.


You are selfhating curry, just kys:forcedsmile:
Theres actually been studies done that gods like krishna and shiva and maybe ram (im not sure about the last one) are actually pre-aryan indus valley civilization gods actually, thats why they've usually been depicted as darker skin. Cause the indus valley civilization peoples were mostly brown to dark brown skin cause of their mixing with the native south asian hunter gatherers aka abos. Here are some faceapp face mixtures between the neolithic iranian farmers and the south asian hunter gatherers that give some idea of how the IVC people might've looked like:
FYsyMqzWQAgr0Qp
Fl9R0c0aUAEalLr
Fl9R0cuaUAMLkT9
FWCtlNyXEAArLov




IDK LMFAO, THEY LOOK LIKE DARK BROWN CURRIES TO ME LMFAO, HMM I WONDER WHY THEY WOULD MAKE THEIR GODS DARK, COULD IT POSSIBLY BE, BECAUSE THEY WANTED THEIR GODS TO REFLECT THEMSELVES??? POSSIBLY???




Just lol, do u hindus even know your own religion? Modern day hinduism is a syncretic religion between the indo-aryan indo european religion and the old IVC religion. The ACTUAL real indo-aryan pre IVC gods were : Indra, Agni, Surya, Varuna, Vayu, Aditi, Prithvi, Usha and Yama. With the 3 main old aryan gods being Varuna, Mithra, and Indra. But most of these gods have actually fallen out of favor of worship for more "puranic" gods. AKA OLDER gods. Now the 3 main important gods of modern day hindus are: Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Mog3D
Water Day Loop GIF by Pi-Slices

Though an interesting read nonetheless.

I always preferred history over fiction anyway.
 
 
 
After getting some pushback from some delusional ethnics on here (especially from some hindus) about the inferiority of ethnic looks and genes, im afraid im going to have to post this thread, that i posted way back in July of last year. Maybe after going through this thread A 2ND TIME, you will get in your thick ethnic skulls that ethnic features are indeed inferior and that Caucasian features are the most superior. It is with a heavy heart that i do this:



PROOF THAT CAUCASOID FEATURES AND LIGHTER SKIN WERE DESIRABLE BEFORE COLONIALISM.​





Lightskinned/whiteskinned caucasoid features have been the ideal of beauty and source of supremacy long before european colonialism happened during the middle ages/ renaissance, and im literally about to give you coping shitskins tons of examples to prove it, hopefully after taking this massive blackpill suppository that i rape right into your asses you will stop deluding yourselves, and learn to live in the real world without coping.

*ahem*

First Curries:

https://www.researchgate.net/public...or_and_Caste_Discrimination_in_Indian_Society

"Last Version: Color and Caste Discrimination The belief in Aryan racial supremacy dominates social hierarchy practices in India. Upper caste members claim a superior lineage by tracing their “genes” to Aryans, connoting a “natural superiority” over “Shudra” and “ex-untouchables.” (The term “ex-untouchables” refers to Scheduled Castes, also known as Avarna (outside four Varna), Outcastes, Panchama, Antyaja, etc.) This chapter uses terms such as Dalits, ex-untouchables interchangeably, to refer to this population, though the socio-legal term defined to this population is Scheduled Castes—deemed as non-Aryans. Aryans textually are described as a pure, noble, and superior race: physically tall, with sharp noses and lighter skin color. Dasyus or Dasas, on the contrary, are considered of lowly origin and racially inferior due to their dark skin. Such stratification based on skin color is perhaps one of the oldest forms of discrimination and domination in human society. India has a 3,000-year-old social hierarchal system rooted in the “varna-jāti” structure. Jāti, or caste system, is a socioreligious organization prescribing restricted commensality, endogamy, practices of untouchability, and other regressive practices. This ancient hierarchy affects, in particular, the rules of dining, endogamy, and caste commensality. Social life is marked by hierarchal practices and other dogmatic beliefs operated through exercising strict control over women and her sexuality. In addition, the cultural complex of beauty, femininity, chastity, and social status is based on skin color and caste location. Lighter skin is considered superior, whereas dark-skinned is rendered as disability, ugly, and inferior. Skin color in thus many ways is marker of social status, inferiority intrinsic to dark skin color, and superiority associated with whiteness/lighter skin shades. This chapter attempts to map historical and contemporary form of color-based discrimination, history of racial discourse, and the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) in promoting and perpetuating color and caste-based discrimination."


www.abovetopsecret.com

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com
www.abovetopsecret.com


"...hadst pleasure in their lauds, O Indra golden-haired."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"O Surya with the golden-haired , ascend for us day after day."

-[Rig Veda 10]

"To him , Rudra the strong , great , fair-complexioned I utter forth a mighty hymn of praises".

- [Rig Veda 2]

"To her ...to this golden-locked Nirriti (goddess of misfortune), I have rendered obeisance."

"Indra , the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"with tawny hair, Savitr hath raised before"

- [Yajur Veda 4


These are all text worshipping the light hair and lighter complexion of the aryans, and there are plenty, plenty more, but i was just giving some. NOTE THIS EVEN FURTHER BLACKPILL: The indo-aryans were a majority lightskinned, BUT brunette hair, and brown/hazel eyed people. The fact that the rigvedic text loves to worship light eyes and light hair colors shows that white worshipping EVEN HAPPENED WITHIN ARYAN SOCIETY ITSELF. Basically, there are "whites among whites". if you catch my drift. The majority brunette haired and brown eyed aryans worshipped the minority light haired and light eyed aryans of their society and held them to be THEIR ideal standard of beauty LMFAO.
Now here are some quotes talking about how the aryans fought against the hate "dasyu"

"By slaying the Dasyus (natives), he [Indra] protected the Aryan color" LMFAO HOLY SHIT THIS IS LITERALLY SOMETHING OUT OF 1940S NAZI PROPAGANDA

- [Rig Veda 3]

"Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshipper, he subdued the lawless for Manu (Noah) , he conquered the black skin."

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 130.8 (I.CXXX.8)]


"the thunderer who bestowed on his white friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the waters." LITERALLY 1500 B.C. LEBENSRAUM LMFAO

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 100.18 (I.C.18)

"Thou to the son of Vidathin, Rjisvan, Thou smotest down the swarthy fifty thousand, and rentest forts as age consumes a garment."

- [Rig Veda , Indra - 4.16.13]


"Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the black skin far away."

- [Rig veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.41.1]



The sacrificer poured out thanks to his god for "scattering the slave bands of black descent", and for stamping out "the vile Dasyan colour."

- [ Rig Veda . II.20.7, II.12.4 ]


"O'er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates."

- [Rig Veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.73.5]



" Indra in battles help his Aryan worshipper, he who hath hundred helps at hand in every fray, in frays that win the light of heaven. Plaguing the lawless he gave up to Manu's seed the dusky skin; Blazing, 'twere, he burns each covetous man away, he burns, the tyrannous away."

- [Rig Veda , Book 1]

Lmao look at this lol, but ugly poopskin hindu dindus will continue to talk about "MUH BRITISH COLONIALISM CREATED MUH WHITE BEAUTY STANDARDS!" No it didnt you coping shitskin, no it didnt. Oh and btw, just a heads up, the rigveda was written somewhere from between 1500 B.C. to 1000 B.C.
en.wikipedia.org


Rigveda - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Now that we took care of curries lets head over to MENA. Lets be real here MENA worship white people and white passing arabs, but i dont feel arsed to look up 100 examples to prove this so ill just give you a few. Heres some:

sonsofvikings.com

Historic Arabic Accounts Describing Vikings

“I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms...
sonsofvikings.com
sonsofvikings.com

I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms we have mentioned. Their swords are broad-bladed and grooved like the Frankish ones. From the tips of his toes to his neck, each man is tattooed in dark green with designs and so forth. All their women wear on their bosoms circular brooches, made of iron, silver, copper, or gold according to their husbands’ wealth … around their necks each woman wears a torc of gold or silver, for each man as soon as he accumulates 10,000 dirhams has a torc made for his wife… every time he increases his wealth 10,000 he has another torc made for his wife, so one woman may wear many torcs.”

- Ahmed Ibn Fadlan (from Lunde and Stone, pp. 45-46).



www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland? - Medievalists.net

The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds.
www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland?​


"The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds. Like other luxury items, these slaves would be worth the cost of transporting them to far-away markets in Asia and the Mediterranean.
The article, ‘The Baltic Finnic People in the Medieval and Pre-Modern Eastern European Slave Trade’, by Professor Jukka Korpela of the University of Eastern Finland, appears in the latest issue of the journal Russian History.


Using chronicles, travelogues and various administrative documents such as tax and land registers, as well as diplomatic reports, he found that there was extensive raiding into parts of Finland, the Russian Karelia and the Baltic Countries during the late medieval and early modern periods, with thousands of persons kidnapped in the north. Only a fraction of them ended up in the Caspian Sea region and Central Asia via the Volgan and Crimean slave markets. Otherwise, slave trade in the Crimea and Volga regions was extensive, and tens of thousands of people were sold into slavery every year. However, the existence of the trade route shows that it was possible, even under primitive conditions, to distribute information about the demand for blonde girls in the far-away markets. The network of those involved in slave trade included men who participated in raids, slave traders and customers representing the leading class of society.

Raids into the north were launched especially from Novgorod, which was well connected to the Crimea and, from there on, to the Caspian Sea and the slave markets of Central Asia. Raids were done by private warlords and princely troops, and they extended all the way to the coasts of the Gulf of Bothnia and Lapland. For example, Korpela writes how:

The Novgorodian warlord Prokopii conquered the town of Kostroma in 1375, imprisoned many local men, women and girls and continued his raid along the Kama and Volga to the town of Bolghar, where the party sold all their Christian prisoners, “young girls and women,” to Moslem traders. Finally the gang proceeded to Astrakhan’, where they were executed, obviously as bandits, by Khan Salchei.


Finns were especially valuable on the slave trade market because they were neither Christian or Muslim, and because of their light skin colour. Korpela explains:

The most expensive slave on the Caffa register was a 14–year-old white boy referred to in the source text as “Jarcaxius” (“Circassian”?), who was sold for 750 aspers, and there were other slaves with good colour qualifications that seemed to carry an above-average price. One four-and-a-half-year-old Rus’ian “white” boy cost 185 aspers, although such young children were usually very cheap on account of their high mortality rate. “White” Saracen slaves were also overpriced in the Genoese registers, and blond boys and girls were expensive on the Italian markets, too.

The slave trade in Eastern Europe gradually faded, as the control exercised by the emerging structure of European states became stronger. The spreading of Christianity also caused a decline in slave trade during the medieval period. Slave trade within Europe declined already in the early medieval period, but in regions bordering on Islamic countries, slave trade continued up until the pre-modern period."



LMAO, IMAGINE GOING FROM THE MIDDLE EAST TO AS FAR NORTH AS NORTHERN FINLAND TO RAID AND CAPTURE A BUNCH OF FINNISH PEASANT CHILDREN, JUST BECAUSE YOU WORSHIP THEIR LOOKS THAT MUCH. THIS IS THE MIDDLE AGES BTW, THERE IS NO AIRPLANES THAT CAN TRAVEL FROM ONE SIDE OF THE WORLD TO THE OTHER IN A FEW HOURS. THIS TRIP WOULD'VE TAKEN WEEKS, IF NOT A FEW MONTHS OF TRAVELING AND BRAVING HOSTILE BANDIT INFESTED DIRT ROADS. IMAGINE TRAVELING FOR WEEKS/MONTHS ON END TO BRAVE ALL SORTS OF DANGERS, JUST TO GET AT THAT BLONDE JB FINNISH PUSSY LMFAO.



On to the Turks: There are some accounts of colorism within ottoman history, not really amongst the turks themselves, cause they were all more or less light skinned really, but there is colorism based on how they treated other races, from worshipping other races they percieved to be closer to their ideal standard of beauty, to putting down those races who they deemed to be further away from their ideal standard of beauty.


en.wikipedia.org

Slavery in the Ottoman Empire - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
In the Ottoman empire, female slaves owned by men were sexually available to their masters, and their children were considered as legitimate as any child born of a free woman, however female slaves owned by women could not be available to their masters' husband by law.[53] This means that any child of a female slave could not be sold or given away. However, due to extreme poverty, some Circassian slaves and free people in the lower classes of Ottoman society felt forced to sell their children into slavery; this provided a potential benefit for the children as well, as slavery also held the opportunity for social mobility.[54] If a harem slave became pregnant, it also became illegal for her to be further sold in slavery, and she would gain her freedom upon her current owner's death.[54] Slavery in and of itself was long tied with the economic and expansionist activities of the Ottoman empire.[55] There was a major decrease in slave acquisition by the late eighteenth century as a result of the lessening of expansionist activities.[55] War efforts were a great source of slave procurement, so the Ottoman empire had to find other methods of obtaining slaves because they were a major source of income within the empire.[55] The Caucasian War caused a major influx of Circassian slaves into the Ottoman market and a person of modest wealth could purchase a slave with a few pieces of gold.[55] At a time, Circassian slaves became the most abundant in the imperial harem.[55]

Circassians, Syrians, and Nubians were the three primary races of females who were sold as sex slaves (Cariye) in the Ottoman Empire.[6] Circassian girls were described as fair and light-skinned and were frequently enslaved by Crimean Tatars then sold to Ottoman Empire to live and serve in a Harem (basically sex slaves for high status officials and the sultan).[6] They were the most expensive, reaching up to 500 pounds sterling, and the most popular with the Turks. Second in popularity were Syrian girls, which came largely from coastal regions in Anatolia.[6] Their price could reach up to 30 pounds sterling. Nubian girls were the cheapest and least popular, fetching up to 20 pounds sterling (lmfao black foids blown the fuck out lmao) :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:. [6] Sex roles and symbolism in Ottoman society functioned as a normal action of power. The palace Harem excluded enslaved women from the rest of society.[46]

en.wikipedia.org

Ottoman Imperial Harem - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
For the perpetuation and service of the Ottoman dynasty, slave girls were either captured in war, given as gifts to the Sultan and the dynastic family on special occasions, recruited within the empire, or procured from neighbouring countries to become imperial court ladies (cariyes). The number of female slaves within the harem varied over time, and the harem itself was regularly renewed as a result of the practice of manumission. Manumission of the previous sultan’s concubines was especially common upon the enthronement of a new sultan. Most enslaved girls were Christian, and came from various countries, regions, and ethnic groups, including Circassia, Georgia, Russia, and Africa.[20] There was no standard practice that determined what age girls entered the harem. Some arrived as children, while others entered at a later age. This slave trade was formally banned in 1854 but the ban was on paper only.[21] After 1854, almost all court lady-slaves were of Circassian origin; the Circassians had been expelled from Russian lands in the 1860s and the improverished refugee parents sold their daughters in a trade that was formally banned but tolerated.[21]

Basically only lightskinned/whiteskinned foids could be apart of the the imperial harem (for the sultan), no blacks allowed :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:









Now on to hispanics :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile:

I mean lmfao, what is there to say, everyone knows that in hispanic society, the whiter more european looking you look, the closer to the ideal standard of beauty you are, and the browner, and more native you look, or the blacker and more african you look, the further away from the ideal standard beauty you are, and the more uglier you are percieved. Im sure there are tons of literary examples that show white worshipping in hispanic society, but tbh i feel lazy now, so instead ill just post this one link, and the image of this painting. I feel like they should be good enough to give you an idea of how shit goes on around there.



en.wikipedia.org

Blanqueamiento - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Redeno





https://www.medievalists.net/2014/04/17/medieval-slave-traders-go-finland/finland/
Go outside bro pls I only see good looking caramel skinned ppl nowadays, blacks and whites are equally subhuman
 
Dindu ramblings, didn’t read.
 
  • +1
Reactions: normie_joe
shhhh the deathnics don’t want to hear this
 
After getting some pushback from some delusional ethnics on here (especially from some hindus) about the inferiority of ethnic looks and genes, im afraid im going to have to post this thread, that i posted way back in July of last year. Maybe after going through this thread A 2ND TIME, you will get in your thick ethnic skulls that ethnic features are indeed inferior and that Caucasian features are the most superior. It is with a heavy heart that i do this:



PROOF THAT CAUCASOID FEATURES AND LIGHTER SKIN WERE DESIRABLE BEFORE COLONIALISM.​





Lightskinned/whiteskinned caucasoid features have been the ideal of beauty and source of supremacy long before european colonialism happened during the middle ages/ renaissance, and im literally about to give you coping shitskins tons of examples to prove it, hopefully after taking this massive blackpill suppository that i rape right into your asses you will stop deluding yourselves, and learn to live in the real world without coping.

*ahem*

First Curries:

https://www.researchgate.net/public...or_and_Caste_Discrimination_in_Indian_Society

"Last Version: Color and Caste Discrimination The belief in Aryan racial supremacy dominates social hierarchy practices in India. Upper caste members claim a superior lineage by tracing their “genes” to Aryans, connoting a “natural superiority” over “Shudra” and “ex-untouchables.” (The term “ex-untouchables” refers to Scheduled Castes, also known as Avarna (outside four Varna), Outcastes, Panchama, Antyaja, etc.) This chapter uses terms such as Dalits, ex-untouchables interchangeably, to refer to this population, though the socio-legal term defined to this population is Scheduled Castes—deemed as non-Aryans. Aryans textually are described as a pure, noble, and superior race: physically tall, with sharp noses and lighter skin color. Dasyus or Dasas, on the contrary, are considered of lowly origin and racially inferior due to their dark skin. Such stratification based on skin color is perhaps one of the oldest forms of discrimination and domination in human society. India has a 3,000-year-old social hierarchal system rooted in the “varna-jāti” structure. Jāti, or caste system, is a socioreligious organization prescribing restricted commensality, endogamy, practices of untouchability, and other regressive practices. This ancient hierarchy affects, in particular, the rules of dining, endogamy, and caste commensality. Social life is marked by hierarchal practices and other dogmatic beliefs operated through exercising strict control over women and her sexuality. In addition, the cultural complex of beauty, femininity, chastity, and social status is based on skin color and caste location. Lighter skin is considered superior, whereas dark-skinned is rendered as disability, ugly, and inferior. Skin color in thus many ways is marker of social status, inferiority intrinsic to dark skin color, and superiority associated with whiteness/lighter skin shades. This chapter attempts to map historical and contemporary form of color-based discrimination, history of racial discourse, and the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) in promoting and perpetuating color and caste-based discrimination."


www.abovetopsecret.com

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com
www.abovetopsecret.com


"...hadst pleasure in their lauds, O Indra golden-haired."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"O Surya with the golden-haired , ascend for us day after day."

-[Rig Veda 10]

"To him , Rudra the strong , great , fair-complexioned I utter forth a mighty hymn of praises".

- [Rig Veda 2]

"To her ...to this golden-locked Nirriti (goddess of misfortune), I have rendered obeisance."

"Indra , the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"with tawny hair, Savitr hath raised before"

- [Yajur Veda 4


These are all text worshipping the light hair and lighter complexion of the aryans, and there are plenty, plenty more, but i was just giving some. NOTE THIS EVEN FURTHER BLACKPILL: The indo-aryans were a majority lightskinned, BUT brunette hair, and brown/hazel eyed people. The fact that the rigvedic text loves to worship light eyes and light hair colors shows that white worshipping EVEN HAPPENED WITHIN ARYAN SOCIETY ITSELF. Basically, there are "whites among whites". if you catch my drift. The majority brunette haired and brown eyed aryans worshipped the minority light haired and light eyed aryans of their society and held them to be THEIR ideal standard of beauty LMFAO.
Now here are some quotes talking about how the aryans fought against the hate "dasyu"

"By slaying the Dasyus (natives), he [Indra] protected the Aryan color" LMFAO HOLY SHIT THIS IS LITERALLY SOMETHING OUT OF 1940S NAZI PROPAGANDA

- [Rig Veda 3]

"Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshipper, he subdued the lawless for Manu (Noah) , he conquered the black skin."

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 130.8 (I.CXXX.8)]


"the thunderer who bestowed on his white friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the waters." LITERALLY 1500 B.C. LEBENSRAUM LMFAO

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 100.18 (I.C.18)

"Thou to the son of Vidathin, Rjisvan, Thou smotest down the swarthy fifty thousand, and rentest forts as age consumes a garment."

- [Rig Veda , Indra - 4.16.13]


"Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the black skin far away."

- [Rig veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.41.1]



The sacrificer poured out thanks to his god for "scattering the slave bands of black descent", and for stamping out "the vile Dasyan colour."

- [ Rig Veda . II.20.7, II.12.4 ]


"O'er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates."

- [Rig Veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.73.5]



" Indra in battles help his Aryan worshipper, he who hath hundred helps at hand in every fray, in frays that win the light of heaven. Plaguing the lawless he gave up to Manu's seed the dusky skin; Blazing, 'twere, he burns each covetous man away, he burns, the tyrannous away."

- [Rig Veda , Book 1]

Lmao look at this lol, but ugly poopskin hindu dindus will continue to talk about "MUH BRITISH COLONIALISM CREATED MUH WHITE BEAUTY STANDARDS!" No it didnt you coping shitskin, no it didnt. Oh and btw, just a heads up, the rigveda was written somewhere from between 1500 B.C. to 1000 B.C.
en.wikipedia.org


Rigveda - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Now that we took care of curries lets head over to MENA. Lets be real here MENA worship white people and white passing arabs, but i dont feel arsed to look up 100 examples to prove this so ill just give you a few. Heres some:

sonsofvikings.com

Historic Arabic Accounts Describing Vikings

“I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms...
sonsofvikings.com
sonsofvikings.com

I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms we have mentioned. Their swords are broad-bladed and grooved like the Frankish ones. From the tips of his toes to his neck, each man is tattooed in dark green with designs and so forth. All their women wear on their bosoms circular brooches, made of iron, silver, copper, or gold according to their husbands’ wealth … around their necks each woman wears a torc of gold or silver, for each man as soon as he accumulates 10,000 dirhams has a torc made for his wife… every time he increases his wealth 10,000 he has another torc made for his wife, so one woman may wear many torcs.”

- Ahmed Ibn Fadlan (from Lunde and Stone, pp. 45-46).



www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland? - Medievalists.net

The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds.
www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland?​


"The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds. Like other luxury items, these slaves would be worth the cost of transporting them to far-away markets in Asia and the Mediterranean.
The article, ‘The Baltic Finnic People in the Medieval and Pre-Modern Eastern European Slave Trade’, by Professor Jukka Korpela of the University of Eastern Finland, appears in the latest issue of the journal Russian History.


Using chronicles, travelogues and various administrative documents such as tax and land registers, as well as diplomatic reports, he found that there was extensive raiding into parts of Finland, the Russian Karelia and the Baltic Countries during the late medieval and early modern periods, with thousands of persons kidnapped in the north. Only a fraction of them ended up in the Caspian Sea region and Central Asia via the Volgan and Crimean slave markets. Otherwise, slave trade in the Crimea and Volga regions was extensive, and tens of thousands of people were sold into slavery every year. However, the existence of the trade route shows that it was possible, even under primitive conditions, to distribute information about the demand for blonde girls in the far-away markets. The network of those involved in slave trade included men who participated in raids, slave traders and customers representing the leading class of society.

Raids into the north were launched especially from Novgorod, which was well connected to the Crimea and, from there on, to the Caspian Sea and the slave markets of Central Asia. Raids were done by private warlords and princely troops, and they extended all the way to the coasts of the Gulf of Bothnia and Lapland. For example, Korpela writes how:

The Novgorodian warlord Prokopii conquered the town of Kostroma in 1375, imprisoned many local men, women and girls and continued his raid along the Kama and Volga to the town of Bolghar, where the party sold all their Christian prisoners, “young girls and women,” to Moslem traders. Finally the gang proceeded to Astrakhan’, where they were executed, obviously as bandits, by Khan Salchei.


Finns were especially valuable on the slave trade market because they were neither Christian or Muslim, and because of their light skin colour. Korpela explains:

The most expensive slave on the Caffa register was a 14–year-old white boy referred to in the source text as “Jarcaxius” (“Circassian”?), who was sold for 750 aspers, and there were other slaves with good colour qualifications that seemed to carry an above-average price. One four-and-a-half-year-old Rus’ian “white” boy cost 185 aspers, although such young children were usually very cheap on account of their high mortality rate. “White” Saracen slaves were also overpriced in the Genoese registers, and blond boys and girls were expensive on the Italian markets, too.

The slave trade in Eastern Europe gradually faded, as the control exercised by the emerging structure of European states became stronger. The spreading of Christianity also caused a decline in slave trade during the medieval period. Slave trade within Europe declined already in the early medieval period, but in regions bordering on Islamic countries, slave trade continued up until the pre-modern period."



LMAO, IMAGINE GOING FROM THE MIDDLE EAST TO AS FAR NORTH AS NORTHERN FINLAND TO RAID AND CAPTURE A BUNCH OF FINNISH PEASANT CHILDREN, JUST BECAUSE YOU WORSHIP THEIR LOOKS THAT MUCH. THIS IS THE MIDDLE AGES BTW, THERE IS NO AIRPLANES THAT CAN TRAVEL FROM ONE SIDE OF THE WORLD TO THE OTHER IN A FEW HOURS. THIS TRIP WOULD'VE TAKEN WEEKS, IF NOT A FEW MONTHS OF TRAVELING AND BRAVING HOSTILE BANDIT INFESTED DIRT ROADS. IMAGINE TRAVELING FOR WEEKS/MONTHS ON END TO BRAVE ALL SORTS OF DANGERS, JUST TO GET AT THAT BLONDE JB FINNISH PUSSY LMFAO.



On to the Turks: There are some accounts of colorism within ottoman history, not really amongst the turks themselves, cause they were all more or less light skinned really, but there is colorism based on how they treated other races, from worshipping other races they percieved to be closer to their ideal standard of beauty, to putting down those races who they deemed to be further away from their ideal standard of beauty.


en.wikipedia.org

Slavery in the Ottoman Empire - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
In the Ottoman empire, female slaves owned by men were sexually available to their masters, and their children were considered as legitimate as any child born of a free woman, however female slaves owned by women could not be available to their masters' husband by law.[53] This means that any child of a female slave could not be sold or given away. However, due to extreme poverty, some Circassian slaves and free people in the lower classes of Ottoman society felt forced to sell their children into slavery; this provided a potential benefit for the children as well, as slavery also held the opportunity for social mobility.[54] If a harem slave became pregnant, it also became illegal for her to be further sold in slavery, and she would gain her freedom upon her current owner's death.[54] Slavery in and of itself was long tied with the economic and expansionist activities of the Ottoman empire.[55] There was a major decrease in slave acquisition by the late eighteenth century as a result of the lessening of expansionist activities.[55] War efforts were a great source of slave procurement, so the Ottoman empire had to find other methods of obtaining slaves because they were a major source of income within the empire.[55] The Caucasian War caused a major influx of Circassian slaves into the Ottoman market and a person of modest wealth could purchase a slave with a few pieces of gold.[55] At a time, Circassian slaves became the most abundant in the imperial harem.[55]

Circassians, Syrians, and Nubians were the three primary races of females who were sold as sex slaves (Cariye) in the Ottoman Empire.[6] Circassian girls were described as fair and light-skinned and were frequently enslaved by Crimean Tatars then sold to Ottoman Empire to live and serve in a Harem (basically sex slaves for high status officials and the sultan).[6] They were the most expensive, reaching up to 500 pounds sterling, and the most popular with the Turks. Second in popularity were Syrian girls, which came largely from coastal regions in Anatolia.[6] Their price could reach up to 30 pounds sterling. Nubian girls were the cheapest and least popular, fetching up to 20 pounds sterling (lmfao black foids blown the fuck out lmao) :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:. [6] Sex roles and symbolism in Ottoman society functioned as a normal action of power. The palace Harem excluded enslaved women from the rest of society.[46]

en.wikipedia.org

Ottoman Imperial Harem - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
For the perpetuation and service of the Ottoman dynasty, slave girls were either captured in war, given as gifts to the Sultan and the dynastic family on special occasions, recruited within the empire, or procured from neighbouring countries to become imperial court ladies (cariyes). The number of female slaves within the harem varied over time, and the harem itself was regularly renewed as a result of the practice of manumission. Manumission of the previous sultan’s concubines was especially common upon the enthronement of a new sultan. Most enslaved girls were Christian, and came from various countries, regions, and ethnic groups, including Circassia, Georgia, Russia, and Africa.[20] There was no standard practice that determined what age girls entered the harem. Some arrived as children, while others entered at a later age. This slave trade was formally banned in 1854 but the ban was on paper only.[21] After 1854, almost all court lady-slaves were of Circassian origin; the Circassians had been expelled from Russian lands in the 1860s and the improverished refugee parents sold their daughters in a trade that was formally banned but tolerated.[21]

Basically only lightskinned/whiteskinned foids could be apart of the the imperial harem (for the sultan), no blacks allowed :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:









Now on to hispanics :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile:

I mean lmfao, what is there to say, everyone knows that in hispanic society, the whiter more european looking you look, the closer to the ideal standard of beauty you are, and the browner, and more native you look, or the blacker and more african you look, the further away from the ideal standard beauty you are, and the more uglier you are percieved. Im sure there are tons of literary examples that show white worshipping in hispanic society, but tbh i feel lazy now, so instead ill just post this one link, and the image of this painting. I feel like they should be good enough to give you an idea of how shit goes on around there.



en.wikipedia.org

Blanqueamiento - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Redeno





https://www.medievalists.net/2014/04/17/medieval-slave-traders-go-finland/finland/

You wrote an entire PhD level thesis on this.

Brootal.
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Epola and thecel
After getting some pushback from some delusional ethnics on here (especially from some hindus) about the inferiority of ethnic looks and genes, im afraid im going to have to post this thread, that i posted way back in July of last year. Maybe after going through this thread A 2ND TIME, you will get in your thick ethnic skulls that ethnic features are indeed inferior and that Caucasian features are the most superior. It is with a heavy heart that i do this:



PROOF THAT CAUCASOID FEATURES AND LIGHTER SKIN WERE DESIRABLE BEFORE COLONIALISM.​





Lightskinned/whiteskinned caucasoid features have been the ideal of beauty and source of supremacy long before european colonialism happened during the middle ages/ renaissance, and im literally about to give you coping shitskins tons of examples to prove it, hopefully after taking this massive blackpill suppository that i rape right into your asses you will stop deluding yourselves, and learn to live in the real world without coping.

*ahem*

First Curries:

https://www.researchgate.net/public...or_and_Caste_Discrimination_in_Indian_Society

"Last Version: Color and Caste Discrimination The belief in Aryan racial supremacy dominates social hierarchy practices in India. Upper caste members claim a superior lineage by tracing their “genes” to Aryans, connoting a “natural superiority” over “Shudra” and “ex-untouchables.” (The term “ex-untouchables” refers to Scheduled Castes, also known as Avarna (outside four Varna), Outcastes, Panchama, Antyaja, etc.) This chapter uses terms such as Dalits, ex-untouchables interchangeably, to refer to this population, though the socio-legal term defined to this population is Scheduled Castes—deemed as non-Aryans. Aryans textually are described as a pure, noble, and superior race: physically tall, with sharp noses and lighter skin color. Dasyus or Dasas, on the contrary, are considered of lowly origin and racially inferior due to their dark skin. Such stratification based on skin color is perhaps one of the oldest forms of discrimination and domination in human society. India has a 3,000-year-old social hierarchal system rooted in the “varna-jāti” structure. Jāti, or caste system, is a socioreligious organization prescribing restricted commensality, endogamy, practices of untouchability, and other regressive practices. This ancient hierarchy affects, in particular, the rules of dining, endogamy, and caste commensality. Social life is marked by hierarchal practices and other dogmatic beliefs operated through exercising strict control over women and her sexuality. In addition, the cultural complex of beauty, femininity, chastity, and social status is based on skin color and caste location. Lighter skin is considered superior, whereas dark-skinned is rendered as disability, ugly, and inferior. Skin color in thus many ways is marker of social status, inferiority intrinsic to dark skin color, and superiority associated with whiteness/lighter skin shades. This chapter attempts to map historical and contemporary form of color-based discrimination, history of racial discourse, and the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) in promoting and perpetuating color and caste-based discrimination."


www.abovetopsecret.com

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1

The Hindu Religion is Racist, page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com
www.abovetopsecret.com


"...hadst pleasure in their lauds, O Indra golden-haired."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"O Surya with the golden-haired , ascend for us day after day."

-[Rig Veda 10]

"To him , Rudra the strong , great , fair-complexioned I utter forth a mighty hymn of praises".

- [Rig Veda 2]

"To her ...to this golden-locked Nirriti (goddess of misfortune), I have rendered obeisance."

"Indra , the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair."

- [Rig Veda 10]

"with tawny hair, Savitr hath raised before"

- [Yajur Veda 4


These are all text worshipping the light hair and lighter complexion of the aryans, and there are plenty, plenty more, but i was just giving some. NOTE THIS EVEN FURTHER BLACKPILL: The indo-aryans were a majority lightskinned, BUT brunette hair, and brown/hazel eyed people. The fact that the rigvedic text loves to worship light eyes and light hair colors shows that white worshipping EVEN HAPPENED WITHIN ARYAN SOCIETY ITSELF. Basically, there are "whites among whites". if you catch my drift. The majority brunette haired and brown eyed aryans worshipped the minority light haired and light eyed aryans of their society and held them to be THEIR ideal standard of beauty LMFAO.
Now here are some quotes talking about how the aryans fought against the hate "dasyu"

"By slaying the Dasyus (natives), he [Indra] protected the Aryan color" LMFAO HOLY SHIT THIS IS LITERALLY SOMETHING OUT OF 1940S NAZI PROPAGANDA

- [Rig Veda 3]

"Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshipper, he subdued the lawless for Manu (Noah) , he conquered the black skin."

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 130.8 (I.CXXX.8)]


"the thunderer who bestowed on his white friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the waters." LITERALLY 1500 B.C. LEBENSRAUM LMFAO

- [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 100.18 (I.C.18)

"Thou to the son of Vidathin, Rjisvan, Thou smotest down the swarthy fifty thousand, and rentest forts as age consumes a garment."

- [Rig Veda , Indra - 4.16.13]


"Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, driving the black skin far away."

- [Rig veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.41.1]



The sacrificer poured out thanks to his god for "scattering the slave bands of black descent", and for stamping out "the vile Dasyan colour."

- [ Rig Veda . II.20.7, II.12.4 ]


"O'er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates."

- [Rig Veda , Soma Pavamana - 9.73.5]



" Indra in battles help his Aryan worshipper, he who hath hundred helps at hand in every fray, in frays that win the light of heaven. Plaguing the lawless he gave up to Manu's seed the dusky skin; Blazing, 'twere, he burns each covetous man away, he burns, the tyrannous away."

- [Rig Veda , Book 1]

Lmao look at this lol, but ugly poopskin hindu dindus will continue to talk about "MUH BRITISH COLONIALISM CREATED MUH WHITE BEAUTY STANDARDS!" No it didnt you coping shitskin, no it didnt. Oh and btw, just a heads up, the rigveda was written somewhere from between 1500 B.C. to 1000 B.C.
en.wikipedia.org


Rigveda - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Now that we took care of curries lets head over to MENA. Lets be real here MENA worship white people and white passing arabs, but i dont feel arsed to look up 100 examples to prove this so ill just give you a few. Heres some:

sonsofvikings.com

Historic Arabic Accounts Describing Vikings

“I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms...
sonsofvikings.com
sonsofvikings.com

I have never seen bodies more perfect than theirs. They were like palm trees. They were fair and ruddy. They wear neither coats nor caftans but a garment that hangs on one side and leaves one hand free. Each of them carries an axe, a sword, and a knife and is never parted from any of the arms we have mentioned. Their swords are broad-bladed and grooved like the Frankish ones. From the tips of his toes to his neck, each man is tattooed in dark green with designs and so forth. All their women wear on their bosoms circular brooches, made of iron, silver, copper, or gold according to their husbands’ wealth … around their necks each woman wears a torc of gold or silver, for each man as soon as he accumulates 10,000 dirhams has a torc made for his wife… every time he increases his wealth 10,000 he has another torc made for his wife, so one woman may wear many torcs.”

- Ahmed Ibn Fadlan (from Lunde and Stone, pp. 45-46).



www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland? - Medievalists.net

The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds.
www.medievalists.net

Why did Medieval Slave Traders go to Finland?​


"The demand for blonde girls and boys was so lucrative that slave traders would hunt for these people as far away as northern Finland, a recent study finds. Like other luxury items, these slaves would be worth the cost of transporting them to far-away markets in Asia and the Mediterranean.
The article, ‘The Baltic Finnic People in the Medieval and Pre-Modern Eastern European Slave Trade’, by Professor Jukka Korpela of the University of Eastern Finland, appears in the latest issue of the journal Russian History.


Using chronicles, travelogues and various administrative documents such as tax and land registers, as well as diplomatic reports, he found that there was extensive raiding into parts of Finland, the Russian Karelia and the Baltic Countries during the late medieval and early modern periods, with thousands of persons kidnapped in the north. Only a fraction of them ended up in the Caspian Sea region and Central Asia via the Volgan and Crimean slave markets. Otherwise, slave trade in the Crimea and Volga regions was extensive, and tens of thousands of people were sold into slavery every year. However, the existence of the trade route shows that it was possible, even under primitive conditions, to distribute information about the demand for blonde girls in the far-away markets. The network of those involved in slave trade included men who participated in raids, slave traders and customers representing the leading class of society.

Raids into the north were launched especially from Novgorod, which was well connected to the Crimea and, from there on, to the Caspian Sea and the slave markets of Central Asia. Raids were done by private warlords and princely troops, and they extended all the way to the coasts of the Gulf of Bothnia and Lapland. For example, Korpela writes how:

The Novgorodian warlord Prokopii conquered the town of Kostroma in 1375, imprisoned many local men, women and girls and continued his raid along the Kama and Volga to the town of Bolghar, where the party sold all their Christian prisoners, “young girls and women,” to Moslem traders. Finally the gang proceeded to Astrakhan’, where they were executed, obviously as bandits, by Khan Salchei.


Finns were especially valuable on the slave trade market because they were neither Christian or Muslim, and because of their light skin colour. Korpela explains:

The most expensive slave on the Caffa register was a 14–year-old white boy referred to in the source text as “Jarcaxius” (“Circassian”?), who was sold for 750 aspers, and there were other slaves with good colour qualifications that seemed to carry an above-average price. One four-and-a-half-year-old Rus’ian “white” boy cost 185 aspers, although such young children were usually very cheap on account of their high mortality rate. “White” Saracen slaves were also overpriced in the Genoese registers, and blond boys and girls were expensive on the Italian markets, too.

The slave trade in Eastern Europe gradually faded, as the control exercised by the emerging structure of European states became stronger. The spreading of Christianity also caused a decline in slave trade during the medieval period. Slave trade within Europe declined already in the early medieval period, but in regions bordering on Islamic countries, slave trade continued up until the pre-modern period."



LMAO, IMAGINE GOING FROM THE MIDDLE EAST TO AS FAR NORTH AS NORTHERN FINLAND TO RAID AND CAPTURE A BUNCH OF FINNISH PEASANT CHILDREN, JUST BECAUSE YOU WORSHIP THEIR LOOKS THAT MUCH. THIS IS THE MIDDLE AGES BTW, THERE IS NO AIRPLANES THAT CAN TRAVEL FROM ONE SIDE OF THE WORLD TO THE OTHER IN A FEW HOURS. THIS TRIP WOULD'VE TAKEN WEEKS, IF NOT A FEW MONTHS OF TRAVELING AND BRAVING HOSTILE BANDIT INFESTED DIRT ROADS. IMAGINE TRAVELING FOR WEEKS/MONTHS ON END TO BRAVE ALL SORTS OF DANGERS, JUST TO GET AT THAT BLONDE JB FINNISH PUSSY LMFAO.



On to the Turks: There are some accounts of colorism within ottoman history, not really amongst the turks themselves, cause they were all more or less light skinned really, but there is colorism based on how they treated other races, from worshipping other races they percieved to be closer to their ideal standard of beauty, to putting down those races who they deemed to be further away from their ideal standard of beauty.


en.wikipedia.org

Slavery in the Ottoman Empire - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
In the Ottoman empire, female slaves owned by men were sexually available to their masters, and their children were considered as legitimate as any child born of a free woman, however female slaves owned by women could not be available to their masters' husband by law.[53] This means that any child of a female slave could not be sold or given away. However, due to extreme poverty, some Circassian slaves and free people in the lower classes of Ottoman society felt forced to sell their children into slavery; this provided a potential benefit for the children as well, as slavery also held the opportunity for social mobility.[54] If a harem slave became pregnant, it also became illegal for her to be further sold in slavery, and she would gain her freedom upon her current owner's death.[54] Slavery in and of itself was long tied with the economic and expansionist activities of the Ottoman empire.[55] There was a major decrease in slave acquisition by the late eighteenth century as a result of the lessening of expansionist activities.[55] War efforts were a great source of slave procurement, so the Ottoman empire had to find other methods of obtaining slaves because they were a major source of income within the empire.[55] The Caucasian War caused a major influx of Circassian slaves into the Ottoman market and a person of modest wealth could purchase a slave with a few pieces of gold.[55] At a time, Circassian slaves became the most abundant in the imperial harem.[55]

Circassians, Syrians, and Nubians were the three primary races of females who were sold as sex slaves (Cariye) in the Ottoman Empire.[6] Circassian girls were described as fair and light-skinned and were frequently enslaved by Crimean Tatars then sold to Ottoman Empire to live and serve in a Harem (basically sex slaves for high status officials and the sultan).[6] They were the most expensive, reaching up to 500 pounds sterling, and the most popular with the Turks. Second in popularity were Syrian girls, which came largely from coastal regions in Anatolia.[6] Their price could reach up to 30 pounds sterling. Nubian girls were the cheapest and least popular, fetching up to 20 pounds sterling (lmfao black foids blown the fuck out lmao) :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:. [6] Sex roles and symbolism in Ottoman society functioned as a normal action of power. The palace Harem excluded enslaved women from the rest of society.[46]

en.wikipedia.org

Ottoman Imperial Harem - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
For the perpetuation and service of the Ottoman dynasty, slave girls were either captured in war, given as gifts to the Sultan and the dynastic family on special occasions, recruited within the empire, or procured from neighbouring countries to become imperial court ladies (cariyes). The number of female slaves within the harem varied over time, and the harem itself was regularly renewed as a result of the practice of manumission. Manumission of the previous sultan’s concubines was especially common upon the enthronement of a new sultan. Most enslaved girls were Christian, and came from various countries, regions, and ethnic groups, including Circassia, Georgia, Russia, and Africa.[20] There was no standard practice that determined what age girls entered the harem. Some arrived as children, while others entered at a later age. This slave trade was formally banned in 1854 but the ban was on paper only.[21] After 1854, almost all court lady-slaves were of Circassian origin; the Circassians had been expelled from Russian lands in the 1860s and the improverished refugee parents sold their daughters in a trade that was formally banned but tolerated.[21]

Basically only lightskinned/whiteskinned foids could be apart of the the imperial harem (for the sultan), no blacks allowed :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:









Now on to hispanics :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile: :forcedsmile:

I mean lmfao, what is there to say, everyone knows that in hispanic society, the whiter more european looking you look, the closer to the ideal standard of beauty you are, and the browner, and more native you look, or the blacker and more african you look, the further away from the ideal standard beauty you are, and the more uglier you are percieved. Im sure there are tons of literary examples that show white worshipping in hispanic society, but tbh i feel lazy now, so instead ill just post this one link, and the image of this painting. I feel like they should be good enough to give you an idea of how shit goes on around there.



en.wikipedia.org

Blanqueamiento - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Redeno





https://www.medievalists.net/2014/04/17/medieval-slave-traders-go-finland/finland/
DNR because I didnt need to read
 
Lighter skin mogs not necessarily whiter
 
No matter how much I hate curries and shit on here, one thing I agree with is that the initial aryans who came to india were genuinely one of the purest of their kind. Its just that they got too complacent and mixed with subhuman abos that created modern subhuman curries. Iranians were better off cuz we didnt mix that much with the natives
 
  • +1
Reactions: ominion
Let me tell you one thing which history taught us: Light trait women = more beautiful
Dark Triad Men = The Opium of Men Beauty.
So for women light, and for men dark. Estrogen ~ Testosterone
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7340.jpeg
    IMG_7340.jpeg
    49.3 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: BrahminBoss
Let me tell you one thing which history taught us: Light trait women = more beautiful
Dark Triad Men = The Opium of Men Beauty.
So for women light, and for men dark. Estrogen ~ Testosterone
Yes bhai we dark bad boys will conqueror white woman soon
 

Attachments

  • images (22).jpeg
    images (22).jpeg
    17 KB · Views: 0
Ramblings.org
 
  • Love it
Reactions: AverageCurryEnjoyer

Similar threads

dreamcake1mo
Replies
96
Views
23K
iam good boy
iam good boy
dreamcake1mo
Replies
56
Views
12K
Joshrc
Joshrc
T
Replies
82
Views
8K
lastamericanvirgin
lastamericanvirgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top