Imagine

D

Deleted member 104531

THE FOOL 🃏
Joined
Nov 3, 2024
Posts
3,996
Reputation
4,785
Title
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 90909
a world like this:
4618511 IMG 7846
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: StupidHedonist_INTP and diditeverbegin
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: StupidHedonist_INTP, Deleted member 104531 and imontheloose
Trump is a capitalist
Nazism is anti capitalist and economically at least closer to Marxism
they werent exactly anti capitalist and they definitely hated Marxism. they rejected free market capitalism but they didnt abolish private property or free enterprise. they just regulated industries and forced the businesses to align with state ideologies. plenty huge German companies thrived under Naziism because of arms production and forced labour. they needed them private businesses for military expansion
 
  • +1
Reactions: StupidHedonist_INTP
they werent exactly anti capitalist and they definitely hated Marxism. they rejected free market capitalism but they didnt abolish private property or free enterprise. they just regulated industries and forced the businesses to align with state ideologies. plenty huge German companies thrived under Naziism because of arms production and forced labour. they needed them private business for military expansion
My point is from an economic perspective they’re closer to Marxism than to an ultra free market. Strasser in particular felt the Nazis were still too right wing economically. Tbh i dislike the left right paradigm here. I’d class nazism as third way alongside fascism and national Bolshevism. Remember private enterprise was still heavily intertwined with the state. Private businesses served the needs of the state than vice versa.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StupidHedonist_INTP and imontheloose
My point is from an economic perspective they’re closer to Marxism than to an ultra free market. Strasser in particular felt the Nazis were still too right wing economically. Tbh i dislike the left right paradigm here. I’d class nazism as third way alongside fascism and national Bolshevism. Remember private enterprise was still heavily intertwined with the state. Private businesses served the needs of the state than vice versa.
yeah exactly, they didnt exactly fit into either, they had a unique blend - "third way" as you call it. national Bolshevism was more explicitly anti capitalist and called for worker control but combined it with nationalist elements, fascism shared the Nazi model of corporatism but lacked the intense racial policies, Naziism blended militarised nationalism with economic planning but it stopped just short of abolishing private enterprise. yeah i totally agree they have their own third position. Hitler purged Gregor's and Strasser's faction in '34 im pretty sure, may have been '35. so it was essentially solidifying a pro corporate, militarised economic policy. they could exist just under the state's goals. Schacht and Speer for example put industry at the service of the state's expansionist goals, Nazis wanted autarky to avoid dependency on foreign markets
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 55437
My point is from an economic perspective they’re closer to Marxism than to an ultra free market. Strasser in particular felt the Nazis were still too right wing economically. Tbh i dislike the left right paradigm here. I’d class nazism as third way alongside fascism and national Bolshevism. Remember private enterprise was still heavily intertwined with the state. Private businesses served the needs of the state than vice versa.
yeah exactly, they didnt exactly fit into either, they had a unique blend - "third way" as you call it. national Bolshevism was more explicitly anti capitalist and called for worker control but combined it with nationalist elements, fascism shared the Nazi model of corporatism but lacked the intense racial policies, Naziism blended militarised nationalism with economic planning but it stopped just short of abolishing private enterprise. yeah i totally agree they have their own third position. Hitler purged Gregor's and Strasser's faction in '34 im pretty sure, may have been '35. so it was essentially solidifying a pro corporate, militarised economic policy. they could exist just under the state's goals. Schacht and Speer for example put industry at the service of the state's expansionist goals, Nazis wanted autarky to avoid dependency on foreign markets
Incel trait:researching history
 
  • +1
Reactions: StupidHedonist_INTP

Similar threads

incelincel
Discussion imagine
Replies
6
Views
29
incelincel
incelincel
incelincel
LifeFuel imagine
Replies
10
Views
42
ibo15
ibo15
A
Replies
7
Views
48
jony🇮🇳🖤
jony🇮🇳🖤
vortex878
Replies
6
Views
34
soapbubble
soapbubble
R@m@
Replies
3
Views
40
jl25
jl25

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top