Immigrants from Asia move to the US not knowing English with $3 to their name and become rich a few decades later while African Americans don’t

It's more than shame sex when you leave the woman single and pregnant. Anyways seething bbc finna slay 2 whites 1 spic and a black this summer watch me impregnate one then leave like a crow in the night
I'm literally black but why though thats fucking stupid why would you make life more difficult for 2 other people have you not learnt anything browsing this forum
 
I'm literally black but why though thats fucking stupid why would you make life more difficult for 2 other people have you not learnt anything browsing this forum
Your not black you a nigerian foh and go eat bone
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and MakinMogReturns

Attachments

  • lksmax avi.png
    lksmax avi.png
    660.4 KB · Views: 0
daily nigger torture thread
 
Being an indian i literally hate other indians. They are most superficial and self hating race . Mofos should get their iq measured before being given an entry on any website and country. Literally they copy the whites , lic their boots that subhuman guy above has edited his pic to oblivion to hide his shit skin and shit hairstyle to hide his wierd skull shape. Even that guy devansh before , then that guy pex and the some more who arestill here. Only indian i think was somewhat good was makeithappen . Pakistanis are even 100 times better than indians here. Its just this low t genes which u can see in their peanut skull. @PrinceLuenLeoncur
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: incel194012940 and PrinceLuenLeoncur
The ones there make paper it is what it is. If you’re gonna have this mindset then be proven wrong and then backtrack that ain’t my business. Africans do well in the USA and they are “black” thus BTFOD your racist BS

African immigrants are just as dumb and talentless as the average African American. They just work harder.
I knew a Nigerian in medical school that thought fruit flies manifested abiogenetically from rotten fruit
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bug_eye_blackcel, Yuhbwoynadia and Deleted member 21661
Cuz they don't

View attachment 2217057

There aren't enough blacks from Africa in USA because to immigrate their you need a ton of money, which most Africans don't

Blacks from Africa aren't included in any of these types of list cuz not enough people in usa
household income stats are utterly irrelevant. that just shows how many kids they have
 
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile
Western born and raised africans, especially African Americans are trapped in a culture of their own making. Becoming successful by getting an education and then generating generational wealth is "gay" and smart, nerdy black men are called "urkels". If you are educationmaxxing and successmaxxing as a black dude, you better somehow be some low inhib alpha Tyrone at the same time, otherwise if you are a well meaning average black dude but not a low inhib Tyrone, you're just an urkel and gay and then are placed lower in a social status in African American society (and other western Africans like black British people).

It's much easier to just become some low inhib alpha Tyrone, by just being a hardass that puts all his energy into a being a gangbanger that gets into fights with the police, doing drugs and trying to fuck ugly black women, then spending time getting an education and actually getting a well paying job.

Remember, that biologically and subconsciously, everything that we do, is to make ourselves seem more "fit" so that we will look more attractive to females who will then want to fuck us and have our babies. Humans are animals, just like any other animal species on this planet. Western black men think that women are attracted to low inhib bad boys (which they are) and so will do what it takes to make themselves seem more "fit" to the opposite sex, even if it means they have to live a lower quality of life in other aspects of life besides fucking women.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bug_eye_blackcel and Yuhbwoynadia
Mindset is everything
No its not being a stupid nigger that is everything . Being a nigger means the iq is limited, so it limits any sort of legal success opportunities. They can only get rich through drug dealing and robbing people and other crime, professional athlete, music career . These don't' require high iq and could make big money, with the catch being only the top ones make any sort of livable income.

This doesn't apply as much to a drug dealer. Even a low tier dealer could pull in a 1000-2000 in a week , but as they lack high iq they often make basic errors and expose themselves and get caught.
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Crusile
African immigrants are just as dumb and talentless as the average African American. They just work harder.
I knew a Nigerian in medical school that thought fruit flies manifested abiogenetically from rotten fruit
Anecdotal shit as usual doesn’t mean fuck all you brainlet bitch.
 
it's all about your upbringing. asians are raised to be the best they can be academically and professionally no matter how poor they are
 
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile
"IQ" measures social class, high income blacks live in lower income neighborhoods than "poor whites" and income doesn't equal wealth or social class

African Americans are oppressed, all their negative characteristics are caused by racism
I always disagree and cage at everything you say, but i simply can't get mad with what you said because of your avi, avi halo is real
1684834565846
 
"they" dont have an IQ of anything, IQ doesn't exist in the brain. IQ measures social class and black people are of low social class. They are as capable as any other human in a racism free environment
but what about the blacks in africa? there's no racism in a full black country, and they still are outperfomed by asians when it comes to iq.
 
but what about the blacks in africa? there's no racism in a full black country, and they still are outperfomed by asians when it comes to iq.
IQ measures social class in western countries. african blacks are poor, uneducated, and werent exposed to the western cultural knowledge tested on IQ tests. Asians who score high on IQ tests were exposed to western cultural items used on IQ tests, in order to confirm their acquired knowledge when taking the IQ test.

Avg IQ in China is probably around 90, btw
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: bug_eye_blackcel and ;-;
I'm literally black but why though thats fucking stupid why would you make life more difficult for 2 other people have you not learnt anything browsing this forum
I mog very hard as long as my son hits 5 9 he will thank me
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6128
There is 1 reason(IQ MAP):
World iq map lynn 2002
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bug_eye_blackcel and AscensionMan98
Trans-Racial Adoption Studies. Race differences in IQ remain following adoption by White middle class parents. East Asians grow to average higher IQs than Whites while Blacks score lower. The Minnesota Trans-Racial Adoption Study followed children to age 17 and found race differences were even greater than at age 7: White children, 106; Mixed-Race children, 99; and Black children, 89.

Twin studies can not (and do not) prove genetic causality. It shows me an expected result, twins copy each other's behavior and IQ measures knowledge seeking behavior

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/1/1/htm
trans-racial adoption studies cant prove genetic causality

Racial Admixture Studies. Black children with lighter skin, for example, average higher IQ scores. In South Africa, the IQ of the mixed-race "Colored" population averages 85, intermediate to the African 70 and White 100.
Skin colour estimates social class, which IQ directly measures
IQ Scores of Blacks and Whites Regress toward the Averages of Their Race. Parents pass on only some exceptional genes to offspring so parents with very high IQs tend to have more average children. Black and White children with parents of IQ 115 move to different averages--Blacks toward 85 and Whites to 100.
IQ isnt genetically heritable so I would expect this? Black people copy the behavior of other black people (who have low IQs). Now the question, is black if IQ is caused by environmental factors/cultural differences (racism), or genetics?
The Gene-Environment Architecture of IQ is the Same in all Races, and Race Differences are Most Pronounced on More Heritable Abilities. Studies of Black, White, and East Asian twins, for example, show the heritability of IQ is 50% or higher in all races.
Behavioral traits are not genetically heritable, according to within family GWASs. IQ believers rely on magical secret genes which can never be discovered LOL iq believers and LOL at epic educational attainment gene architecture

1684856079825


Kf2pcAr.png
LOL

epic h2 estimates falsifies all adoption study genetic heritability estimates to be non-genetic heritability estimates
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940

Twin studies can not (and do not) prove genetic causality. It shows me an expected result, twins copy each other's behavior and IQ measures knowledge seeking behavior

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/5/1/1/htm
trans-racial adoption studies cant prove genetic causality


Skin colour estimates social class, which IQ directly measures

IQ isnt genetically heritable so I would expect this? Black people copy the behavior of other black people (who have low IQs). Now the question, is black if IQ is caused by environmental factors/cultural differences (racism), or genetics?

Behavioral traits are not genetically heritable, according to within family GWASs. IQ believers rely on magical secret genes which can never be discovered LOL iq believers and LOL at epic educational attainment gene architecture

View attachment 2218800

Kf2pcAr.png
LOL

epic h2 estimates falsifies all adoption study genetic heritability estimates to be non-genetic heritability estimates

Your first source is an anti-psychiatry/anti-science site that literally has SOCIAL JUSTICE written on its banner and is filled with non-sequiturs to try and discredit the research because the heritability of IQ is arch-heresy to liberals. Surely it isn't biased :feelskek:

"The MISTRA was largely financed (about 60% or $1.42 million, roughly $3 million in 2018 U.S. dollars) by the Pioneer Fund, an organization created in the late 1930s to support eugenics, anti-Semitism and racial segregation, and racial differences research."

IQ is heritable and polygenic. Any attempt to dispute that is just cope.


Abstract:

In the context of current concerns about replication in psychological science, we describe 10 findings from behavioral genetic research that have replicated robustly. These are “big” findings, both in terms of effect size and potential impact on psychological science, such as linearly increasing heritability of intelligence from infancy (20%) through adulthood (60%). Four of our top 10 findings involve the environment, discoveries that could have been found only with genetically sensitive research designs. We also consider reasons specific to behavioral genetics that might explain why these findings replicate.

Finding 1. All psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic influence

Finding 2. No traits are 100% heritable

Finding 3. Heritability is caused by many genes of small effect

Finding 4. Phenotypic correlations between psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic mediation

Finding 5. The heritability of intelligence increases throughout development

Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics

Finding 7. Most measures of the “environment” show significant genetic influence

Finding 8. Most associations between environmental measures and psychological traits are significantly mediated genetically

Finding 9. Most environmental effects are not shared by children growing up in the same family

Finding 10. Abnormal is normal

Behavior is influenced by genetics.
 
large proportion of old chinese people working in non intellectually demanding repetitive work environments that lowers intelligence. Young chinese IQ is probably 100/normal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and incel194012940
Your first source is an anti-psychiatry/anti-science site that literally has SOCIAL JUSTICE written on its banner and is filled with non-sequiturs to try and discredit the research because the heritability of IQ is arch-heresy to liberals. Surely it isn't biased :feelskek:

"The MISTRA was largely financed (about 60% or $1.42 million, roughly $3 million in 2018 U.S. dollars) by the Pioneer Fund, an organization created in the late 1930s to support eugenics, anti-Semitism and racial segregation, and racial differences research."

IQ is heritable and polygenic. Any attempt to dispute that is just cope.




Behavior is influenced by genetics.
Yea he debunks misleading claims of reared apart twins who werent actually reared apart. Actual GWAS anaylsis disproves their genetic heritability claims. (2015)? the within-family GWASs came out in 2020 and 2022

Mental traits arent genetically heritable https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2020/08/16/conceptual-arguments-against-heredetarianism/

Genotypic IQ is false https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/04/29/33458/

"IQ" isnt a measure of anything and g doesnt exist https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/03/01/the-myth-of-general-intelligence/
 
Yea he debunks misleading claims of reared apart twins who werent actually reared apart. Actual GWAS anaylsis disproves their genetic heritability claims. (2015)? the within-family GWASs came out in 2020 and 2022

Mental traits arent genetically heritable https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2020/08/16/conceptual-arguments-against-heredetarianism/

Genotypic IQ is false https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/04/29/33458/

"IQ" isnt a measure of anything and g doesnt exist https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/03/01/the-myth-of-general-intelligence/

Your source is a fucking blogpost. What else is there to say lmao keep living in dreamland
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bug_eye_blackcel and incel194012940
Your source is a fucking blogpost. What else is there to say lmao keep living in dreamland
just rely on quantitative data and use your preconception filled incel brain to interpret it theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile and Deleted member 29710
Your source is a fucking blogpost. What else is there to say lmao keep living in dreamland
facepalm, you believe in the false variable of g and made-up magic undetectable genes for IQ. I believe in cause and effect, theres no evidence of the existence of g, causal genetics, etc


Bouchard and colleagues never published their full-sample DZA IQ correlations, even though they published full-sample DZA correlations for personality, “special mental abilities,” and most other MISTRA-studied psychological characteristics. To this day, they have prohibited independent researchers from inspecting the closely guarded MISTRA raw data. I show in my new article that the likely reason that they did not publish, share, or make available their full-sample DZA control group IQ data was that—based on the near full-sample DZA IQ correlations that were published in 2007 and 2012—the results would have revealed their failure to find a significantly higher MZA group versus DZA group mean correlation for any of the three IQ measures they used. An “important first step” requirement in the process of determining whether genetic factors influence IQ scores is finding that the MZA correlation is higher than the corresponding DZA correlation at a statistically significant level. The researchers bypassed this required step in their 1990 Science study, most likely because the hidden results failed to confirm their pre-existing belief that IQ was (strongly) influenced by genetic factors.9 Their strong genetic biases, it seems, led them to omit, bypass, and suppress their DZA IQ correlations in order to obtain the desired results.10


example of a so-called "reared at birth twins"
“The paternal aunts decided to take one twin each and they have brought them up amicably, living next-door to one another….They are constantly in and out of each other’s houses.…They have always been closely attached to each other….When they were younger, Christopher used to follow Bertram around ‘as if he were a younger brother’” (pp. 164-165).
 
  • +1
Reactions: inceI
facepalm, you believe in the false variable of g and made-up magic undetectable genes for IQ. I believe in cause and effect, theres no evidence of the existence of g, causal genetics, etc





example of a so-called "reared at birth twins"

"The research team found that identical twins who are reared apart had the same chance of being similar as twins who were raised together."

If you ever read the study that you're copy-pasting retarded articles about you'd realize that this stuff was covered there which is why it's still a highly reputable source to this day. Continue believing the type of people that made claims like this unironically when the results of these studies have been replicated countless times over.






If you really think everyone is the same, don't worry, I have an entire list of studies to show you just how much of a fucking retard you are. Funny how when it comes to this field in particular people lose their fucking minds over the obvious reality.

 
"IQ is heritable and polygenic. Any attempt to dispute that is just cope."

What can prove IQ's genetic heritability? again, within family GWAS gives doubt to twin heritability estimates. Twin studies cannot prove genetic causality. you have nothing
 
  • +1
Reactions: inceI
"IQ is heritable and polygenic. Any attempt to dispute that is just cope."

What can prove IQ's genetic heritability? again, within family GWAS gives doubt to twin heritability estimates. Twin studies cannot prove genetic causality. you have nothing
You can start by reading over the corpus of studies I gave to you on this topic before running your mouth again, lmao.
 
"IQ is heritable and polygenic. Any attempt to dispute that is just cope."

What can prove IQ's genetic heritability? again, within family GWAS gives doubt to twin heritability estimates. Twin studies cannot prove genetic causality. you have nothing
Saying that GWAS never proved heritability is a lie.
 
"The research team found that identical twins who are reared apart had the same chance of being similar as twins who were raised together."

If you ever read the study that you're copy-pasting retarded articles about you'd realize that this stuff was covered there which is why it's still a highly reputable source to this day. Continue believing the type of people that made claims like this unironically when the results of these studies have been replicated countless times over.






If you really think everyone is the same, don't worry, I have an entire list of studies to show you just how much of a fucking retard you are. Funny how when it comes to this field in particular people lose their fucking minds over the obvious reality.


care to respond to the in-family GWAS h2 estimates of behavior? Yes genes marginally influence EA through a unknown cause. This doesnt prove genetic causality in SES/IQ/any racial differences
A
"The research team found that identical twins who are reared apart had the same chance of being similar as twins who were raised together."
Most reared apart twins were in contact with each other, read the links I posted. My position is, twins copy each others behavior(EA) which causes a shared tested IQ. There is no debunking this

ADDITIONALLY, identical twins have the shared environment of a traumatic experience of being reared apart from their ID twin
 
Last edited:
Saying that GWAS never proved heritability is a lie.
recent within-family GWAS reduced behavioral h2 to almost zero LOL why dont you read my responses
 
Emil is also a "blog poster" who posts to a blog.

4vKHXwZ.png
July 2019

wen future genomics studies (facepalm)
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940
Name a single safe country that's over 20 percent black you would want to live in from the middle east, Latin America, Caribbean, and Africa

EZxp08uUcAEnetp.jpg
Ghana and Kenya
 
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile
Emil is also a "blog poster" who posts to a blog.

4vKHXwZ.png
July 2019

wen future genomics studies (facepalm)
Like I said, you're a poor troll peddling the claims of a science denialist. And just lmao at thinking 1 cherrypicked study debunks the literal thousands contradicting it. By the way, your sperging about the G factor or whatever doesn't matter. IQ has been proven to have strong correlations with basically every relevant measure leading to success in society and is only becoming more correlated as time goes on. If you don't believe in IQ, you basically don't believe in the field of psychology as a whole. :feelskek:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: incel194012940
Like I said, you're a poor troll peddling the claims of a science denialist. And just lmao at thinking 1 cherrypicked study debunks the literal thousands contradicting it. By the way, your sperging about the G factor or whatever doesn't matter. IQ has been proven to have strong correlations with basically every relevant measure leading to success in society and is only becoming more correlated as time goes on. If you don't believe in IQ, you basically don't believe in the field of psychology as a whole. :feelskek:
What are the thousands that contradict it? Most IQ believer have fallen back on believing in magical mystery genes that cant be pinpointed and are solely relying on false twin studies heritability estimates, but not the isolated genetic heritability they need.

IQ/g is a false variable http://bactra.org/weblog/523.html
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940
@Crusile


this is a very interesting blog, will be reading though, not philosophy-educated enough for strong thoughts

my impression is that his debunkings seem legit, but his constructions are presumptive, ex not enough is known about the brain to justify his dualism
 
Other way around. Black Amercian culture is based of west English culture. Aka whites, so the blacks for Cumskinised

Blaxks play the game of life on nightmare mode so when we do well understand it took far more work for us to get there than you fuckers so 40% is still impressive considering how much harder our lives are
3687F9CD 42D0 4577 9806 5A2E3F00E933
CCF38868 DEA6 4A8E 92D0 104D21AF3AAD
 
@Crusile


this is a very interesting blog, will be reading though, not philosophy-educated enough for strong thoughts

my impression is that his debunkings seem legit, but his constructions are presumptive, ex not enough is known about the brain to justify his dualism


Nice source bro.
So when they got driven out, they had to stick together. As I noted in the linked article on the connection between Ashkenazi Jews and Southern Italians, male Jews migrated from the Levant to Rome during Greco-Roman times, which mass conversions led to 6 million Roman women who then began to practice Judaism. The genetic proximity of Ashkenazi Jews and Syrian Jews to Northern Italians, Sardinians and French populations suggest that there is non-Semitic ancestry in Ashkenazi Jews. The findings also say that any theories of Ashkenazi Jews having ancestry in Khazaria or from Slavs are incompatible with genetic studies. The close genetic similarity of Ashkenazi Jews and Southern Europeans has been noted in many studies. Any theories of Ashkenazi Jews being converts from the Khazar empire got put to rest by this paper. Anyway, that’s part of the reason for their higher average IQ, breeding with beautiful Roman women a few thousand years ago.
 
What are the thousands that contradict it? Most IQ believer have fallen back on believing in magical mystery genes that cant be pinpointed and are solely relying on false twin studies heritability estimates, but not the isolated genetic heritability they need.

IQ/g is a false variable http://bactra.org/weblog/523.html
If we do the proper genetic studies on horses, lots of them ( > 10^6) we will eventually be able to find variants that predict how large or how fast individual horses are, and ( dare I say it) we will eventually be able to tell if certain breeds of horses are genetically big or small, fast or slow. People have always wondered if Percherons are really larger than Shetland ponies – or if that’s just a stereotype. Some say that Thoroughbreds are faster than Clydesdales – wouldn’t it be nice to actually know for sure? Of course there are deep philosophical questions about what ‘ genetically different ‘ really means – and we wouldn’t really know that two breeds were different unless we also understood the mechanism of each and every common variant that boosted or reduced size or speed. Since quantitative selection boosts any variant that favors the trait under selection, and those variants work through many different biological pathways, we have some work to do. But we still won’t really know that my Prince (a Shetland) was inherently* slower than Secretariat unless we understand every one of those mechanisms. And their interactions. And their little dog, too! We also need to understand the historical reasons for any differences – what selective pressures drove those differences, how those pressures varied over space and time – or we don’t really know anything.

Admixture studies might be useful, but they’re icky.



And we need to motorize those fences at Wrigley Field.



* Maybe Prince was deprived due to my cousins shooting him with their BB guns. He caught one of them later, kneeled on her, and broke her collarbone. Depraved on account of being deprived?
 
bbc still has hundred times more smv than you
The most white states watch the least interracial porn. Go and check the pornhub statistics for yourself. This bbc cope has got to end. Most black men are a dime a dozen. There's only a few legitimate Tyrones in an major city.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29710
If we do the proper genetic studies on horses, lots of them ( > 10^6) we will eventually be able to find variants that predict how large or how fast individual horses are, and ( dare I say it) we will eventually be able to tell if certain breeds of horses are genetically big or small, fast or slow. People have always wondered if Percherons are really larger than Shetland ponies – or if that’s just a stereotype. Some say that Thoroughbreds are faster than Clydesdales – wouldn’t it be nice to actually know for sure? Of course there are deep philosophical questions about what ‘ genetically different ‘ really means – and we wouldn’t really know that two breeds were different unless we also understood the mechanism of each and every common variant that boosted or reduced size or speed. Since quantitative selection boosts any variant that favors the trait under selection, and those variants work through many different biological pathways, we have some work to do. But we still won’t really know that my Prince (a Shetland) was inherently* slower than Secretariat unless we understand every one of those mechanisms. And their interactions. And their little dog, too! We also need to understand the historical reasons for any differences – what selective pressures drove those differences, how those pressures varied over space and time – or we don’t really know anything.

Admixture studies might be useful, but they’re icky.



And we need to motorize those fences at Wrigley Field.



* Maybe Prince was deprived due to my cousins shooting him with their BB guns. He caught one of them later, kneeled on her, and broke her collarbone. Depraved on account of being deprived?
the heritability estimates for behavioral traits in animals is like .2, in properly controlled environments (unlike human h estimates) and Of course physical traits are genetically heritable ffs!

In humans, if behavioral differences dont exist in the brain or genes, how can they be selected for? they cant and arent
 
Last edited:
what if theres nothing to find? Lack of evidence is evidence for it to be true
im inclined to think so, especially combined with research in nonlocal consciousness (not in his logic).

but theres still room for argument to be debunked in the near future,

i can't consider something a strong fact until you can just laugh at someone when they say "what if advances in (currently developing technological field) show something different" for being retarded
 
Ironically proves my point, these pieces of shit are prob the reason why I struggled finding a job despite having more credentials than them. I don’t do FAANG though but still.

Joke is gooks benifit from affirmative action more than even black Americans, but the biggest beneficiaries are white girls by far but I doubt he chastised them noo let’s hate on the race that fought for equality and without which I wouldn’t even be in the USA. Fuckin gooks and that’s why we hate them
If we do the proper genetic studies on horses, lots of them ( > 10^6) we will eventually be able to find variants that predict how large or how fast individual horses are, and ( dare I say it) we will eventually be able to tell if certain breeds of horses are genetically big or small, fast or slow. People have always wondered if Percherons are really larger than Shetland ponies – or if that’s just a stereotype. Some say that Thoroughbreds are faster than Clydesdales – wouldn’t it be nice to actually know for sure? Of course there are deep philosophical questions about what ‘ genetically different ‘ really means – and we wouldn’t really know that two breeds were different unless we also understood the mechanism of each and every common variant that boosted or reduced size or speed. Since quantitative selection boosts any variant that favors the trait under selection, and those variants work through many different biological pathways, we have some work to do. But we still won’t really know that my Prince (a Shetland) was inherently* slower than Secretariat unless we understand every one of those mechanisms. And their interactions. And their little dog, too! We also need to understand the historical reasons for any differences – what selective pressures drove those differences, how those pressures varied over space and time – or we don’t really know anything.

Admixture studies might be useful, but they’re icky.



And we need to motorize those fences at Wrigley Field.



* Maybe Prince was deprived due to my cousins shooting him with their BB guns. He caught one of them later, kneeled on her, and broke her collarbone. Depraved on account of being deprived?
I’m not low IQ I can guarantee you my IQs higher than yours and I have far more credentials than you in stem your just some Gayreek living off your ancestors accomplishments when gayreece is bankrupt shithole in 2023
 
large proportion of old chinese people working in non intellectually demanding repetitive work environments that lowers intelligence. Young chinese IQ is probably 100/normal @cloUder national IQ estimates that use IQ converted standardized test scores are unreliable. Asian American outperformed whites when controlling for iq so i would expect Chinese iq to be much lower than the estimate. They don't possess enough western knowledge to score "105"
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787

Similar threads

incelhunter
Replies
29
Views
2K
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
leF
Replies
57
Views
2K
protomogger9873
protomogger9873
got.daim
Replies
64
Views
2K
wishIwasSalludon
wishIwasSalludon
got.daim
Replies
22
Views
1K
iblamejames
iblamejames

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top