Imo PSL metrics for womens’ beauty are deeply flawed

vigor

vigor

Nietzschean Vitalist
Joined
May 28, 2026
Posts
264
Reputation
244
Don’t care if I’m called a greyfag for this but:
  • Hollow cheeks on women aren’t attractive
  • Very lean women aren’t attractive
  • Angularity is not a halo for women
  • Mandibular recession is nowhere near as big of a failo on foids than in men
  • Hooded, very positively tilted “low trust” eyes are a masculine trait and “doe eyes” are just as, if not more attractive on women
  • There should be a much greater emphasis on dimorphism and soft tissue traits, youth indicators etc
  • In general for smv, body matters much more for foids than men (LTB bodycel absolutely mogs LTN gymcel even without accounting for hypergamy)
Most “stacies” look masculine and like femboys/trannies, and some very beautiful women are considered MTBs at best
 

Similar threads

Hurricane1
Replies
3
Views
30
Zenis
Zenis
Matrix88
Replies
8
Views
68
Niebvll
Niebvll
C
Replies
3
Views
45
yyk117
yyk117
youriblamegenetics
Replies
1
Views
27
chang cypionate
chang cypionate
Shrek2OnDvD
Replies
30
Views
149
ltnbrownacnecel
ltnbrownacnecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top