Important Poll with people who flirt with females

Love bombing/Validation is the key

  • No, being as inattentive as possible will make them simp

    Votes: 2 8.3%
  • It's somewhere in the middle, combining both, leaning validation

    Votes: 17 70.8%
  • It's somewhere in the middle, leaning inattentive

    Votes: 5 20.8%

  • Total voters
    24
  • Poll closed .
Newday*V3

Newday*V3

Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Posts
1,615
Reputation
1,924
I saw a thread saying love bombing/clearly communicating that you find the woman you talk to hot, in a way that gives them sexual validation/confidence to open up to you is the key

This idea can be very conflicting in certain circumstances, since people also have the idea that woman get quickly turned off when they feel like they aren't the ones chasing and simping

This poll is to see if it's either or, or if it's somewhere in the middle

Would love to see some higher IQ input replies, thanks

Leonardo Dicaprio Whatever GIF by Jordan Belfort
 
  • +1
Reactions: DieVoGel6949 and White_Bwoi
im killing everyone
 
1743895113658
 
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: AustrianOak47, Newday*V3 and YungTrappa
It depends of the girl ''level'' for me... When it's obvious that she's into you and even simping for you then you can be natural not play any tactics tbh, NATURAL xD
When high stakes situation with possible HTB/STACY level threat I think we all make terrible mistakes due to stress & non nt and this shiet.

My most RECENT "situation" (still 3-4months ago jfl) sway me to the last most simp option = chick told me straight up that if I didn't be so charming/smiling OPEN about yeah "I like you" and instead played weird games and act "cool"/"unavailable" she wouldn't sleep with me. DEAD SERIOUS. And she was 6'1'' (for real) fogger. (but mentally insane it ended after a month lol)

I say if you're not THUGMAXXED MF, don't play distant cold psycho if you feel otherwise, "foids" can smell it in 0,0003s that's why you "MTN's" can't slay shit tbh, blackpill still applies to ALL, but cope about GAME not, ok :ogre:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Newday*V3
Can you add something so we can view results? Or a non-flirter option?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Suns9999 and Newday*V3
  • JFL
Reactions: diditeverbegin and Suns9999
I saw a thread saying love bombing/clearly communicating that you find the woman you talk to hot, in a way that gives them sexual validation/confidence to open up to you is the key

This idea can be very conflicting in certain circumstances, since people also have the idea that woman get quickly turned off when they feel like they aren't the ones chasing and simping

This poll is to see if it's either or, or if it's somewhere in the middle

Would love to see some higher IQ input replies, thanks

Leonardo Dicaprio Whatever GIF by Jordan Belfort
Looks are still the most important thing but showing her love will definitely help. There is also a difference between love and obsession.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Newday*V3
Looks are still the most important thing but showing her love will definitely help. There is also a difference between love and obsession.
yes bro looks are law but females still care about a person’s demeanour towards them to an extent, speaking from experience
 
  • +1
Reactions: DieVoGel6949
yes bro looks are law but females still care about a person’s demeanour towards them to an extent, speaking from experience
It's pretty minimal tho. Matters mostly for normies
 
This is only for people who have spoken to women before sorry
Tbh I kinda wanted this cos I dont play these games when talking to women
 
You truly have to not care, I had one girl I literally couldn't care less and I had her obsessed for like a month straight. Some time passed and literally the moment I started to care a little bit, it went downhill as fuck, if you care you can't be truly inattentive. When I didn't give a shit about her, my reply time, my humour, my confidence was naturally high as fuck and it was genuine. When I cared and tried to lay back again it wasn't the same
 
  • +1
Reactions: Newday*V3
You truly have to not care, I had one girl I literally couldn't care less and I had her obsessed for like a month straight. Some time passed and literally the moment I started to care a little bit, it went downhill as fuck, if you care you can't be truly inattentive. When I didn't give a shit about her, my reply time, my humour, my confidence was naturally high as fuck and it was genuine. When I cared and tried to lay back again it wasn't the same
I have done this too and girls usually get bored or lose confidence in themselves after a month or 2
 
I have done this too and girls usually get bored or lose confidence in themselves after a month or 2
Yup, I was really pushing it with that girl (we were just texting for like 1.5 month before I accepted her invite to come over to her house). I feel like it's about finding the right balance and also you can't be nonchalant and cool via texting and when you see each other in person you're a 180 different person- that instantly kills attraction
 
  • +1
Reactions: Newday*V3
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Newday*V3
imo if she really likes you it doesnt matter, you can literally murder her family and she will still want you
 
I saw a thread saying love bombing/clearly communicating that you find the woman you talk to hot, in a way that gives them sexual validation/confidence to open up to you is the key

This idea can be very conflicting in certain circumstances, since people also have the idea that woman get quickly turned off when they feel like they aren't the ones chasing and simping

This poll is to see if it's either or, or if it's somewhere in the middle

Would love to see some higher IQ input replies, thanks

Leonardo Dicaprio Whatever GIF by Jordan Belfort
That's how Larry Lowe cold approaches white brahs in prison

Https   advancelocal adapter image uploadss3amazonawscom imagealcom home bama media widt
"Damn baby you so fine. Gnomesayin? You need to come back 2 mah cell n let me give u sum chocolate lovin'. Gnomesayin?"


If that doesn't work he just pulls out his shank and threatens to stab white brah if he doesn't give up the bussy.

@optimisticzoomer
 
Last edited:
  • WTF
Reactions: Newday*V3
You truly have to not care, I had one girl I literally couldn't care less and I had her obsessed for like a month straight. Some time passed and literally the moment I started to care a little bit, it went downhill as fuck, if you care you can't be truly inattentive. When I didn't give a shit about her, my reply time, my humour, my confidence was naturally high as fuck and it was genuine. When I cared and tried to lay back again it wasn't the same
On the morning of November 11, 2018, twenty-five-year-old Jacob Barefield was in the prison canteen with fellow inmates from the "C Dorm." (Doc. # 74 at 22.) Barefield was wearing a yellow wristband designating him to C Dorm. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) Barefield was standing in the canteen's snack-line when another inmate, Larry Lowe, approached him. (Doc. # 74 at 22.) Lowe was wearing a teal wristband designating him to the "F Dorm" where high-risk of violence inmates are assigned. (Doc. # 74 at 22.) F Dorm residents, like Lowe, should not have been allowed in the canteen with C Dorm residents. (Doc. # 74 at 22.) But Lowe was there.
Lowe approached Barefield in the snack line, showed Barefield a knife that he held at his waist, and forced Barefield to follow him. (Doc. # 74 at 22.) No guards witnessed this abduction because no guards were in the canteen at the time, despite dozens of inmates from various housing units being present. (Doc. # 74 at 23.)
Unsupervised, Lowe forced Barefield out of the canteen and into the prison yard. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) Lowe forced Barefield through the prison yard, past many buildings, and toward the entrance of the F Dorm. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) Despite Ventress policies requiring guards to be stationed between the canteen and F Dorm, Lowe and Barefield did not pass a single guard during the walk. (Doc. # 74 at 23.)
Once at the F Dorm entryway, Lowe opened the door and forced Barefield into the dormitory. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) The door was supposed to be locked, but it was not. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) A guard was supposed to be at the door checking wristband colors and stopping non-F Dorm residents from entering, but the officer did not. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) Instead, Lowe was able to simply open the front door and force Barefield—who was not authorized to enter F Dorm—inside.
The F Dorm houses approximately 100 high-risk inmates in a single open-room environment. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) Once inside the open-bay dorm, Lowe forced Barefield to a lower bunkbed at the back of the unit. (Doc. # 74 at 23.) Sheets and blankets hung from the upper bunk to create a "tent" that covered the lower bunk and prevented anyone from seeing what happened inside. (Doc. # 74 at 23-24.) These makeshift tents are against Ventress policy. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) But Barefield was forced into one at knifepoint.
A nearby TV's volume was turned all the way up. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) Outside the tent, Lowe told another inmate that he was "going to show him how to take control of another inmate." (Doc. # 74 at 24.) Lowe then got into the tent. There, in the middle of the morning, in a violent offender's dorm that Barefield should never have been allowed to enter, in a crowded area that should have been supervised by a guard, in a makeshift tent that should have been immediately taken down, using a knife that should have been confiscated, Larry Lowe raped Jacob Barefield. (Doc. # 74 at 24.)
Lowe pulled down his pants and forced his penis into Barefield's mouth. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) When Barefield did not cooperate to Lowe's liking, Lowe pressed his knife to Barefield's side. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) Lowe forced Barefield to lie down. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) Lowe then pulled Barefield's pants down, put shaving cream in Barefield's rectum, and anally raped him. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) All the while, Lowe kept the knife pressed to Barefield's side. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) The TV drowned out any cries. (Doc. # 74 at 24.) Lowe's gangmate waited outside the tent.
 

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
61
Views
1K
True truecel
True truecel
fvolkek
Replies
22
Views
422
fvolkek
fvolkek
0hMan
Replies
61
Views
2K
iblameCopecels
iblameCopecels
got.daim
Replies
41
Views
559
disillusioned
disillusioned
BigJimsWornOutTires
Replies
24
Views
532
BigJimsWornOutTires
BigJimsWornOutTires

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top