In the 60s they put JBs in the households of .org Users and explicitly encouraged sexual contact between them

[Deleted member 22918]

Short German history lesson:

Helmut Kentler - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Kentler placed neglected youth as foster children in the homes of single pedophile fathers for the ostensible purpose of resocializing them, while explicitly encouraging sexual contact between the foster fathers and their wards.

Government Funded btw, for 30+ years btw

 

[BongMog]

@JBcollector

 

[Deleted member 21735]

i wouldnt touch my itis if she was a jb

 

[Martyros]

HOLY FUCK LIFEFUEL!!!

Why the fuck wasn't I born at that time instead of the fucking 90's like a faggot.

I would be creampieing a cute aryan virgin jb teen which is the fucking DREAM OF MY LIFE!!!

 

[Deleted member 2100]

That’s really fucking disgusting ngl, can’t see how the government would provide funding for this.

 

[Deleted member 25059]

 

[Deleted member 22918]

HOLY FUCK LIFEFUEL!!!

Why the fuck wasn't I born at that time instead of the fucking 90's like a faggot.

I would be creampieing a cute aryan virgin jb teen which is the fucking DREAM OF MY LIFE!!!

U would have been raised by a fucking ugly pedo that touches u all night all day

 

[Deleted member 22918]

That’s really fucking disgusting ngl, can’t see how the government would provide funding for this.

Almost like they could be pedos themselves, huh?

 

[DefinitelyNT]

Europe moment

 

[Deleted member 2100]

Almost like they could be pedos themselves, huh?

I imagine a lot of people in high positions of power are pedos given the whole Epstein situation. In the article it says the guy who did this experiment admitted to starting a sexual relation with his 13 yo son. I wonder why that it is tho, that most people in high positions have pedo fetishes.

 

[Brus Wane]

Short German history lesson:

Helmut Kentler - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Government Funded btw, for 30+ years btw

Nigga wtf did I just read?!

Kevin Spacey & EDP got NOTHING, I MEAN NOTHING on this guy.

Bleach my eyes Jesus Christ

 

[Deleted member 29710]

Post-WW2 Germany was the most cucked nation on Earth.

Whether Kentler himself had sexual relationships with young people, such as his foster and adopted sons or his tutoring students, is still an open question,[34] although his colleague Gunter Schmidt has claimed Kentler disclosed having "sexually abused" one of his sons from the age thirteen and through adulthood until the son committed suicide in 1991.

Jesus Christ.

 

[Deleted member 22918]

I imagine a lot of people in high positions of power are pedos given the whole Epstein situation. In the article it says the guy who did this experiment admitted to starting a sexual relation with his 13 yo son. I wonder why that it is tho, that most people in high positions have pedo fetishes.

It's definitely weird

I believe in the 80s the green party here in Germany tried to make relationships between children and grown men legal, but i would have to look it up again

 

[Brus Wane]

I believe in the 80s the green party here in Germany tried to make relationships between children and grown men legal, but i would have to look it up again

Absolutely disgusting.

H*tler did nothing wrong.

Btw if it was between boys & grown faggots, I believe this is the word you might be looking for.

Pederasty - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[JBcollector]

Applying for German study visa as we speak

 

[Deleted member 22918]

Applying for German study visa as we speak

Don't worry we welcome anybody

 

[blackpilledforlife]

Fucking disgusting

 

[Deleted member 17578]

This is about male mentally ill kids being put together with pedos though.
Do you want an ugly, mentaly ill 12yo boy put in your household? Obviously not.

This situation wouldn't be as likely to happen with young girls, since young girls have female-privilege and are likely to find love/social acceptance in healthier places/situations.

I think this guy is absolutely fucked up, but he brings forward some good points:
"These people only endured these moronic boys because they were in love and infatuated with them."

Effectively he is saying these boys stood no chance, since nobody really wants to care for or bond with a mentally ill (ugly) boy. So one of the few chances these boys had to experience any love/social connection was to pair them with pedo-sexual adult men.



In the end this story just touches upon the issue of being an undesirable, unprivileged man. Or even boy in this case.
It's very hard for such a man/boy to find social acceptance in the world; no family figures, ugly looks, no talents/value, mental illness, no money, etc.

While pairing these boys with pedo-sexuals obviously has its own issues, you have to look at this issue relative to what other treatment they might've gotten during that time. What was the alternative?
Very likely to grow up abused and neglected in some sort of foster-home. How does that compare to being cared for and having sex with a pedo-sexual adult man?

Hard to tell. At least this guy did research on this idea and apparently it was a huge-success. Although obviously the deep unethical practices involved in this study are to be considered.

In the end we live in a very unideal world in which sometimes you gotta make the best of what you have. Which could very well have been endorsing pedo-sexuality in this case.

 

[Deleted member 20890]

I imagine a lot of people in high positions of power are pedos given the whole Epstein situation. In the article it says the guy who did this experiment admitted to starting a sexual relation with his 13 yo son. I wonder why that it is tho, that most people in high positions have pedo fetishes.

Faggots are pedos, that’s why

 

[Deleted member 17578]

With men, people always assume the worst. Especially when it comes to sexuality.

Similarly when I would date a 14year old girl. People would automatically assume I am abusing her, using her as a sex-slave, not giving her any freedom, etc. etc. People will automatically have these absolutely disgusting baseless assumptions of how a relationship like that would be like.

Which in relation to the black-pill, is just another clear case of the male struggle and female privilege. Of how people will tend to assume the absolute worst of you when you are male, with your wants/needs/desires as a man being extremely unimportant.

The happiness, life satisfaction obtained by a 23yo incel male from dating a virgin JB is considered entirely irrelevant and unimportant. Brutal.

 

[Deleted member 22918]

This is about male mentally ill kids being put together with pedos though.
Do you want an ugly, mentaly ill 12yo boy put in your household? Obviously not.

This situation wouldn't be as likely to happen with young girls, since young girls have female-privilege and are likely to find love/social acceptance in healthier places/situations.

I think this guy is absolutely fucked up, but he brings forward some good points:
"These people only endured these moronic boys because they were in love and infatuated with them."

Effectively he is saying these boys stood no chance, since nobody really wants to care for or bond with a mentally ill (ugly) boy. So one of the few chances these boys had to experience any love/social connection was to pair them with pedo-sexual adult men.



In the end this story just touches upon the issue of being an undesirable, unprivileged man. Or even boy in this case.
It's very hard for such a man/boy to find social acceptance in the world; no family figures, ugly looks, no talents/value, mental illness, no money, etc.

While pairing these boys with pedo-sexuals obviously has its own issues, you have to look at this issue relative to what other treatment they might've gotten during that time. What was the alternative?
Very likely to grow up abused and neglected in some sort of foster-home. How does that compare to being cared for and having sex with a pedo-sexual adult man?

Hard to tell. At least this guy did research on this idea and apparently it was a huge-success. Although obviously the deep unethical practices involved in this study are to be considered.

In the end we live in a very unideal world in which sometimes you gotta make the best of what you have. Which could very well have been endorsing pedo-sexuality in this case.

Interesting perspective

And yeah the title is kinda clickbait. I posted the same thing yesterday and got zero reaction lol

 

[Deleted member 29710]

This is about male mentally ill kids being put together with pedos though.
Do you want an ugly, mentaly ill 12yo boy put in your household? Obviously not.

This situation wouldn't be as likely to happen with young girls, since young girls have female-privilege and are likely to find love/social acceptance in healthier places/situations.

I think this guy is absolutely fucked up, but he brings forward some good points:
"These people only endured these moronic boys because they were in love and infatuated with them."

Effectively he is saying these boys stood no chance, since nobody really wants to care for or bond with a mentally ill (ugly) boy. So one of the few chances these boys had to experience any love/social connection was to pair them with pedo-sexual adult men.



In the end this story just touches upon the issue of being an undesirable, unprivileged man. Or even boy in this case.
It's very hard for such a man/boy to find social acceptance in the world; no family figures, ugly looks, no talents/value, mental illness, no money, etc.

While pairing these boys with pedo-sexuals obviously has its own issues, you have to look at this issue relative to what other treatment they might've gotten during that time. What was the alternative?
Very likely to grow up abused and neglected in some sort of foster-home. How does that compare to being cared for and having sex with a pedo-sexual adult man?

Hard to tell. At least this guy did research on this idea and apparently it was a huge-success. Although obviously the deep unethical practices involved in this study are to be considered.

In the end we live in a very unideal world in which sometimes you gotta make the best of what you have. Which could very well have been endorsing pedo-sexuality in this case.

I think it's pretty hard to call this a huge success when the guy who did it raped his foster son for years until his foster son ended up killing himself. Getting beaten is 100% better than that.

 

[Deleted member 17578]

Interesting perspective

And yeah the title is kinda clickbait. I posted the same thing yesterday and got zero reaction lol

Average brained people are too dumb to understand the complexness of this situation and will resort to their base emotions of disgust to a situation like this. Shove it away, hide it.


What if this same doctor wouldn't have intervened in this case, but did the 'standard procedure'. Probably sending them to some sort of foster home where, based on the (mental) issues these boys already had, they would likely live absolutely dreadful lives. Bullied and neglected, socially isolated. And then write a study on the consequences of that. How many of the boys end up as depressed malfunctional human beings, committing suicide, etc.

There were mostly only going to be losers here, no matter what was done or what intervention was made.
It's just how human nature, life can be sometimes: Absolutely brutal.

It's like putting 10 people on a boat with only enough food to have 5 of them survive:
A lot of nasty shit is going to happen. People WILL die from hunger or conflict, this is guaranteed. If there's women involved, it's likely they will have to accept trading their body for sex to one of the surviving men. The alternative: Death.
As a guy, you will have to kill the other men on the boat. The alternative: Death.

The brutality of life and the inevitable evil one must do. No different than this situation with the boys.

 

[Deleted member 17578]

I think it's pretty hard to call this a huge success when the guy who did it raped his foster son for years until his foster son ended up killing himself. Getting beaten is 100% better than that.

The 'huge success' didn't refer to this guy's own abusive relationship with his foster son. But to the situations with the subjects he had placed with other pedophiles. You would have to find the details of the studies and how the lives of those kids turned out.

Also just because there's some suicides in these instances, doesn't mean that it still isn't a great success.

You would have to compare them with the likely alternative of being abused and neglected in a foster-home. How many boys end up killing themselves coming from those backgrounds? Etc.

 

[Deleted member 29710]

The 'huge success' didn't refer to this guy's own abusive relationship with his foster son. But to the situations with the subjects he had placed with other pedophiles. You would have to find the details of the studies and how the lives of those kids turned out.

Also just because there's some suicides in these instances, doesn't mean that it still isn't a great success.

You would have to compare them with the likely alternative of being abused and neglected in a foster-home. How many boys end up killing themselves coming from those backgrounds? Etc.

The two boys took on different roles in their new family. Sven was the good son, docile and loving. Marco was more defiant, but at night, when Henkel came into his room asking to cuddle, or waited for him while he brushed his teeth before bed, he had to comply. “I just accepted it out of loyalty, because I didn’t know anything else,” Marco told me. “I didn’t think what was happening was good, but I thought it was normal. I thought of it a little bit like food. People have different tastes in food, the way some people have different tastes in sexuality.” If Sven’s bedroom door was open and he wasn’t there, Marco knew what was happening, but the two boys never talked about what Henkel did to them. “It was an absolutely taboo subject,” Marco said.

One night, Marco took a knife from the kitchen and slept with it under his pillow. When Henkel approached his bed and discovered the blade, he withdrew quickly, called Helmut Kentler, then handed the phone to Marco. “There’s a devil behind my wall,” Marco tried to explain. Kentler had a calming, grandfatherly presence. He assured Marco that there was no such thing as devils, and Marco agreed to surrender the knife.

Marco’s mother and brother were allowed to visit roughly once a month, but Henkel often cancelled the visits at the last minute, or cut them short, saying that they were disruptive. Afterward, Marco would sometimes urinate in his bed or lose focus in school, writing numbers and letters backward. “It was as if he wanted to say: there is no point in anything,” Henkel wrote. Kentler warned the youth-welfare office that Marco’s “educational successes are ruined by a few hours of being with his mother.” Marco’s father was not allowed to see him at all, because Henkel reported that Marco said that his dad had beaten him. Marco was so terrified of his father, Henkel said, that he suffered from “fearful fantasies when he noticed people of Arab appearance on the street.”

Marco’s teachers recommended that he see a child therapist, who was supposed to meet with him for two hours a week. But the therapist said that Henkel was holding Marco “prisoner”—Henkel always sat close by, in an adjacent room. Marco remembers that, once, after a session began without Henkel’s realizing it, he barged into the room and hit the therapist in the face. When a school psychologist referred Sven for counselling, too, Henkel would not allow him to take any psychological tests, according to records. “Not with me!” he shouted. “If you all want to make a ‘case’ out of [Sven], then do it without me.” (Sven seemed upset by the outburst, asking Henkel, “Does that mean you want to give me away?”)

Unironically seems like they'd just be better off in a regular shitty foster home.

 

[Deleted member 17578]

Unironically seems like they'd just be better off in a regular shitty foster home.

That piece was written by a woman decades later during modern times. Written to attract views, likes. I have strong reason to doubt that this text, or the article it's from, paints an accurate picture of the situation or its context.

One only has to think of how strongly pedophilia is judged nowadays to realize the kind of audience she is catering to. Not to underplay the grave ethical concerns of this entire situation and people's responsibility in any means.

 

[Deleted member 17578]

This guy seems to be very based actually.

In Kentler's view, it was not enough for parents to avoid putting obstacles in the way of their children's sexual desires; rather, parents should introduce their children to sexuality, because otherwise they "risk leaving them sexually underdeveloped, becoming sexual cripples". Parents would bear a high degree of responsibility here: "Parents must be made aware that a good relationship of trust between children and parents cannot be maintained if children are denied the satisfaction of such urgent and urgent needs as sexual ones." Early experiences of coitus are useful, because teenagers with coitus experience "demand an independent world of teenagers and more often reject the norms of adults".

One of Kentler's particular concerns was the reduction of sexual repression amongst girls: "Often the repressive education was so successful that they no longer feel any sexual pressure. A sexually open-minded boy then calls such a girl 'uptight', 'unfashionable'.

It essentially touches on the subject of inceldom and how bad it is for mental development. The last paragraph is especially interesting because it's pretty clear to all of us that nowadays it's boys that are sexually repressed, not girls. With inexperienced boys that don't take sexual lead being considered losers/virgins/etc etc etc.

And I agree with Kentler here that parents are highly responsible to introduce their children to sexual experiences during their teenage years.

Ideally not much parental intervention is needed to prevent inceldom. As is usually the case when kids come from a healthy family situation, a good male role-model, not being ugly/fat and being exposed to plenty of interaction with the opposite sex.

But ofcourse life isn't a fairytale and it isn't always perfect like that. Then I think it's important that teens are given a helping hand.

 

[Deleted member 23778]

That piece was written by a woman decades later during modern times. Written to attract views, likes. I have strong reason to doubt that this text, or the article it's from, paints an accurate picture of the situation or its context.

One only has to think of how strongly pedophilia is judged nowadays to realize the kind of audience she is catering to. Not to underplay the grave ethical concerns of this entire situation and people's responsibility in any means.

Holy shit you can't even break character to see how fucked up this guy was. To the point you even call him based. What 0 pussy does to a nigga

 

[Deleted member 23778]

This guy seems to be very based actually.



It essentially touches on the subject of inceldom and how bad it is for mental development. The last paragraph is especially interesting because it's pretty clear to all of us that nowadays it's boys that are sexually repressed, not girls. With inexperienced boys that don't take sexual lead being considered losers/virgins/etc etc etc.

And I agree with Kentler here that parents are highly responsible to introduce their children to sexual experiences during their teenage years.

Ideally not much parental intervention is needed to prevent inceldom. As is usually the case when kids come from a healthy family situation, a good male role-model, not being ugly/fat and being exposed to plenty of interaction with the opposite sex.

But ofcourse life isn't a fairytale and it isn't always perfect like that. Then I think it's important that teens are given a helping hand.

Just molest your kids to prevent inceldom theory jfl kys

 

[Deleted member 17578]

Just molest your kids to prevent inceldom theory jfl kys

Your reply to my comment indicates you are too immature to handle subjects like this. Either that or just trolling, either way gtfo and go post in some mog-battle topic instead of here.

 

[Deleted member 22918]

Bu

 

[VenatorLuparius]

White people have strayed too far from the path of their so-called god "Jesus" (Isa PBUH in Islam).

Complete degeneraçy. To all my fellow ethnics: do not reproduce with them, this malady runs in their blood.

 

[LowTrust]

girls? Based where do I sign up

 

[Deleted member 6128]

White people have strayed too far from the path of their so-called god "Jesus" (Isa PBUH in Islam).

Complete degeneraçy. To all my fellow ethnics: do not reproduce with them, this malady runs in their blood.

IT'S THE JEW, IT'S THE JEWS

 

[Deleted member 23778]

Your reply to my comment indicates you are too immature to handle subjects like this. Either that or just trolling, either way gtfo and go post in some mog-battle topic instead of here.

It is you whose brain lacks maturity, hence why you're a pedo. To the point you even wish pedophilia on those kids who had a childhood like yours. I was incel until 23 and no fucking way I would ever justify weird shit like this.

 

[Deleted member 17578]

It is you whose brain lacks maturity, hence why you're a pedo. To the point you even wish pedophilia on those kids who had a childhood like yours. I was incel until 23 and no fucking way I would ever justify weird shit like this.

 

[Deleted member 22918]

:banderas:

 

[Deleted member 46979]

This is about male mentally ill kids being put together with pedos though.
Do you want an ugly, mentaly ill 12yo boy put in your household? Obviously not.

This situation wouldn't be as likely to happen with young girls, since young girls have female-privilege and are likely to find love/social acceptance in healthier places/situations.

I think this guy is absolutely fucked up, but he brings forward some good points:
"These people only endured these moronic boys because they were in love and infatuated with them."

Effectively he is saying these boys stood no chance, since nobody really wants to care for or bond with a mentally ill (ugly) boy. So one of the few chances these boys had to experience any love/social connection was to pair them with pedo-sexual adult men.



In the end this story just touches upon the issue of being an undesirable, unprivileged man. Or even boy in this case.
It's very hard for such a man/boy to find social acceptance in the world; no family figures, ugly looks, no talents/value, mental illness, no money, etc.

While pairing these boys with pedo-sexuals obviously has its own issues, you have to look at this issue relative to what other treatment they might've gotten during that time. What was the alternative?
Very likely to grow up abused and neglected in some sort of foster-home. How does that compare to being cared for and having sex with a pedo-sexual adult man?

Hard to tell. At least this guy did research on this idea and apparently it was a huge-success. Although obviously the deep unethical practices involved in this study are to be considered.

In the end we live in a very unideal world in which sometimes you gotta make the best of what you have. Which could very well have been endorsing pedo-sexuality in this case.

keep romanticizing being fucked in the ass.

 

[Deleted member 17578]

:banderas:

almost forgot this topic existed

 

[Mr.Proper]

So one of the few chances these boys had to experience any love/social connection was to pair them with pedo-sexual adult men

But also since they were mentally deficient, they were much less likely to report some abuse, or, given the context, their reports would just be ignored alltogether, so they could be sexually abused in any possible way as some human dolls and couldn't do much about it since children are weak plus mentally ill like mentioned above.