Incel ideology is communism but for relationships/ mating

[Robert E Lee]

Communists believe that 20% of the people have 80% of total wealth
Incels believe that 1% chads gets 100% women
Both argue that a small group of elites control entire/ majority limited resources. For communists, its the bourgeois and for incels, they are chads

Both think of means of production / dating more than those who can actually have access to them. They write theories or use mental gymnastics to cope with their unfortunate state of affairs.

But difference is Communists believe there should be a mass uprising against bourgeois and the dictatorship of the proletariat will prevail but Incels try to looksmax and be chad

 

[Robert E Lee]

Random photo of a whore for bait

 

[Gonthar]

So, how exactly would sexual communism be implemented?

 

[jgrey080]

So, how exactly would sexual communism be implemented?

It's not how, more like do we even want to?

 

[Robert E Lee]

So, how exactly would sexual communism be implemented?

It's not how, more like do we even want to?

We cant. Communism can’t be implemented.

 

[Deleted member 76088]

So, how exactly would sexual communism be implemented?

Like in the medieval ages. Highly monogamous and shaming sex outside marriage. This ensures that every man gets a women and vice versa.

 

[Minuskul]

View attachment 4051659
Random photo of a whore for bait

Smash

 

[gunrenaissance]

Communists believe that 20% of the people have 80% of total wealth
Incels believe that 1% chads gets 100% women
Both argue that a small group of elites control entire/ majority limited resources. For communists, its the bourgeois and for incels, they are chads

Both think of means of production / dating more than those who can actually have access to them. They write theories or use mental gymnastics to cope with their unfortunate state of affairs.

But difference is Communists believe there should be a mass uprising against bourgeois and the dictatorship of the proletariat will prevail but Incels try to looksmax and be chad
View attachment 4051656View attachment 4051657

did you read the marxist-rodgerist manifesto

 

[Deleted member 76088]

I actually thought about this a few hours ago. I’m a social darwinist in favor of natural selection

 

[Gonthar]

It's not how, more like do we even want to?

Well, incels would obviously benefit from it, Chads and women won't however, but the incels would soon become the majority...

We cant. Communism can’t be implemented.

Well, it worked for some time in the Soviet Union and the Eastern European countries, back then everyone had a job, had an apartment, the state took care of everything. For the poor, lazy and unmotivated people it was great, since they got all this stuff for little effort that they would have never received in a capitalist country, but for the smart, hard-working and ambitious people it wasn't great since they would receive the exact same stuff as the others, everyone was pretty much equal.

 

[gimmedatacc]

looksmaxxing is a normie thing not an incel thing you stupid fuck. incels discuss the beta uprising not looksmaxxing. go back to tiktok

 

[1966Ford]

Marxist-Rodgerism

 

[messi1]

Yep, the good-looking people fuck each other and have beautiful babies, it's not fair
we should force Stacy to mate with subhuman

 

[Klasik616]

Communists believe that 20% of the people have 80% of total wealth
Incels believe that 1% chads gets 100% women
Both argue that a small group of elites control entire/ majority limited resources. For communists, its the bourgeois and for incels, they are chads

Both think of means of production / dating more than those who can actually have access to them. They write theories or use mental gymnastics to cope with their unfortunate state of affairs.

But difference is Communists believe there should be a mass uprising against bourgeois and the dictatorship of the proletariat will prevail but Incels try to looksmax and be chad
View attachment 4051656View attachment 4051657

This is called commonly "cultural marxism", it's actually a left wing strategy of the old master-slave relationship that explains social differences. This makes sense and could allign with the recent statistics we're seeing in Gen Z men. That means blackpill is more "scientific" than bluepill or redpill but of course leftists and trad right wingers won't agree with incels for moral reasons.

 

[theRetard]

This is called commonly "cultural marxism", it's actually a left wing strategy of the old master-slave relationship that explains social differences. This makes sense and could allign with the recent statistics we're seeing in Gen Z men. That means blackpill is more "scientific" than bluepill or redpill but of course leftists and trad right wingers won't agree with incels for moral reasons.

what are your thoughts on libertarianism?

 

[Klasik616]

what are your thoughts on libertarianism?

Lackluster in economics, it's full of economic theory. Focuses in micro economics and forgets political realism, they don't know about math either. Their system of ethics is original though... Despite that there's no unity within their members as there are right and left libertarians. They're hated by both capitalists (estatists) and communists. They don't have political future cause they're against politics, they also hate humans which explains the cope with individualism and their "anti-ethics". Right libertarians couldn't care less of how other people live. Left libertarians just don't want any goverment or private property.

 

[theRetard]

Lackluster in economics, it's full of economic theory. Focuses in micro economics and forgets political realism. It has their own system of ethics which is something I agree on. Despite that there's no unity within their members as there are right and left libertarians. They're hated by both capitalists (estatists) and communists. They don't have political future cause they're against politics, they also hate humans which explains the cope with individualism.

what is political realism?

 

[Klasik616]

what is political realism?

Anything that is related to the current state of politics within their own countries or between them. If you ignore these it's impossible to transition to a free society, is not like every country around wants to be your ally. With the world we have now it's a fantasy to think a global free market will fix any trouble. Open your markets and other countries will close theirs. Wealth is made of subjection, you need third world labour to become wealthy. At best free markets serve as a social benefit since anyone can produce or sell anything.

 

[choppedshyt]

Yep, the good-looking people fuck each other and have beautiful babies, it's not fair
we should force Stacy to mate with subhuman

Makes you realize how retarded inceldom is when you put it that way

 

[theRetard]

Anything that is related to the current state of politics within their own countries or between them. If you ignore these it's impossible to transition to a free society, is not like every country around wants to be your ally. With the world we have now it's a fantasy to think a global free market will fix any trouble. Open your markets and other countries will close theirs.

we can just nuke countries those are not allied. I hate etatist shitholes

 

[theRetard]

At best free markets serve as a social benefit since anyone can produce or sell anything.

.

 

[theRetard]

Anything that is related to the current state of politics within their own countries or between them. If you ignore these it's impossible to transition to a free society, is not like every country around wants to be your ally. With the world we have now it's a fantasy to think a global free market will fix any trouble. Open your markets and other countries will close theirs. Wealth is made of subjection, you need third world labour to become wealthy. At best free markets serve as a social benefit since anyone can produce or sell anything.

why do you think they will close their markets?

 

[theRetard]

Anything that is related to the current state of politics within their own countries or between them. If you ignore these it's impossible to transition to a free society, is not like every country around wants to be your ally. With the world we have now it's a fantasy to think a global free market will fix any trouble. Open your markets and other countries will close theirs. Wealth is made of subjection, you need third world labour to become wealthy. At best free markets serve as a social benefit since anyone can produce or sell anything.

so why do you think subjection is bad? btw many companies already use third world labor (southeast asian and chinese)

 

[Klasik616]

so why do you think subjection is bad? btw many companies already use third world labor (southeast asian and chinese)

These are easy questions, search for the answer on the web or study more to understand what economics is (no cope self help books tho).

 

[theRetard]

These are easy questions, search for the answer on the web or study more to understand what economics is (no cope self help books tho).

i think in libertarian society the wealthy works by using his reason and the poor works by using his hands. of course the poor must subject to the rich because the rich is smart and knows better how to use poor's handlabor. So subjection is not only morally right, but necessary imo

 

[Klasik616]

i think in libertarian society the wealthy works by using his reason and the poor works by using his hands. of course the poor must subject to the rich because the rich is smart and knows better how to use poor's handlabor. So subjection is not only morally right, but necessary imo

I'm talking about countries not societies. The reason a country closes markets is to prevent other countries from taking their wealth with imports and only export stuff. A country should not be subjected to another, that's basically a colony. In a company, the wealthy are not the ones who are "smart" the rich people don't have to think. The ones who think are the middle class that's why they study so much and become employees of the rich. The rich don't do much, they just buy and sell stuff. Their wealth is made with the labour of the employees both middle and low class employees, they don't have to work a 9-5. Only the CEO (which is not always the property owner) is the "mind" of the company such as Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk, and this is right. But their sons and family are not smart for being wealthy. Making money is easier for the rich and harder for the poor. Poor people buy from the rich and work from them but can't afford anything since the owners have all their money. This is not necessary because if the company didn't have an unique owner, their wages would be entirely gained from their revenues and distributed proportionally thus making everyone richer.

 

[theRetard]

I'm talking about countries not societies. The reason a country closes markets is to prevent other countries from taking their wealth with imports and only export stuff. A country should not be subjected to another, that's basically a colony. In a company, the wealthy are not the ones who are "smart" the rich people don't have to think. The ones who think are the middle class that's why they study so much and become employees of the rich. The rich don't do anything by definition, they just buy and sell stuff. Their wealth is made with the labour of the employees both middle and low class employees. Only the CEO (which is not always the property owner) is the "mind" of the company such as Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk, and this is right. But their sons and family are not smart for being wealthy. Making money is easier for the rich and harder for the poor. Poor people buy from the rich and work from them but can't afford anything since the owners have all their money. This is not necessary because if the company didn't have an unique owner, their salaries would be entirely gained from their revenues and distributed proportionally.

middle class just has more practical virtue than rich class. but rich class is more theoretical intelligent

 

[theRetard]

I'm talking about countries not societies. The reason a country closes markets is to prevent other countries from taking their wealth with imports and only export stuff. A country should not be subjected to another, that's basically a colony. In a company, the wealthy are not the ones who are "smart" the rich people don't have to think. The ones who think are the middle class that's why they study so much and become employees of the rich. The rich don't do much, they just buy and sell stuff. Their wealth is made with the labour of the employees both middle and low class employees, they don't have to work a 9-5. Only the CEO (which is not always the property owner) is the "mind" of the company such as Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk, and this is right. But their sons and family are not smart for being wealthy. Making money is easier for the rich and harder for the poor. Poor people buy from the rich and work from them but can't afford anything since the owners have all their money. This is not necessary because if the company didn't have an unique owner, their wages would be entirely gained from their revenues and distributed proportionally thus making everyone richer.

If the son of rich man turns out to be stupid, he will lose all his wealth. The rich are more theoretically intelligent, that's why they are rich

 

[Klasik616]

If the son of rich man turns out to be stupid, he will lose all his wealth. The rich are more theoretically intelligent, that's why they are rich

The owner is in the same IQ bracket as the employees who are in the high positions. But being rich ≠ being smart. I know many rich people who just live off heritage. To become rich generally needs an above average IQ. The ones who do manual labor are either: unemployed in the stuff they know, too poor and lack time to study or simply stupid to do anything else. Usually the highest IQ is the manager or an special employee such as an engineer or a doctor, sometimes the owner is the manager.

 

[theRetard]

The owner is in the same IQ bracket as the employees who are in the high positions. But being rich ≠ being smart. I know many rich people who just live off heritage. To become rich generally needs an above average IQ. The ones who do manual labor are either: unemployed in the stuff they know, too poor and lack time to study or simply stupid to do anything else. Usually the highest IQ is the manager or an special employee such as an engineer or a doctor, sometimes the owner is the manager.

iq is a lie. smart means having your reason control your emotions. dumb means emotion control the reason.
Just look at how when dumb people win a lottery with millions of dollars, they lose it in first 2 years and become poor again

 

[theRetard]

. I know many rich people who just live off heritage.

btw they are evil, we need to rob them. living off heritage of your parents is evil

 

[Klasik616]

btw they are evil, we need to rob them. living off heritage of your parents is evil

It depends on your parents. Some don't agree to share their wealth like my dad. Other parents spoil their kids.

 

[messi1]

Makes you realize how retarded inceldom is when you put it that way

Communist, incel have 1 thing in common: Jealous
Communist: Jealous of rich people
Incel: Jealous of beautiful people

 

[theRetard]

It depends on your parents. Some don't agree to share their wealth like my dad. Other parents spoil their kids.

being rich is good and highly moral but not when you just got all wealth from your parents instead of becoming rich from your reason/logos. there must be a system that prevents those bad cases.

 

[Klasik616]

being rich is good and highly moral but not when you just got all wealth from your parents instead of becoming rich from your reason/logos. there must be a system that prevents those bad cases.

Doesn't make sense. If you're born rich you don't deserve the money. If you're born poor and got rich you deserve it? What's the point of earning money and having a family then. I don't think morals has anything to do with having or not having money. I just think the way companies work is not fair, the distribution of wealth should be better. An employee makes 10k$ a month but only receives 3k$-4k$.

 

[theRetard]

I just think the way companies work is not fair, the distribution of wealth should be better. An employee makes 10k$ a month but only receives 3k$-4k$.

yeah i agree and it's what aristotle called equalized justice

 

[Changmentum]

To be fair, you don’t have to be a leftist to acknowledge inequality. In fact, it’s mostly people on the right that reject blank slatism, and acknowledge genetic differences between genders, groups, and individuals. That being said, it is completely plausible and non contradictory for a leftist person to be a blackpiller.

 

[theRetard]

To be fair, you don’t have to be a leftist to acknowledge inequality. In fact, it’s mostly people on the right that reject blank slatism, and acknowledge genetic differences between genders, groups, and individuals. That being said, it is completely plausible and non contradictory for a leftist person to be a blackpiller.

do you think inequality is bad?

 

[Changmentum]

do you think inequality is bad?

Well depends, but I agree with the left that excessive inequality and a small group of people controlling American society is a net negative because they tend to limit the voices of the masses, and implement policies that keep themselves in power, rather than what’s best for society at large.

 

[theRetard]

Well depends, but I agree with the left that excessive inequality and a small group of people controlling American society is a net negative because they tend to limit the voices of the masses, and implement policies that keep themselves in power, rather than what’s best for society at large.

i hate political inequality but i'm ok with economical, gender or any other inequality except political one

 

[TiktokUser]

Communist, incel have 1 thing in common: Jealous
Communist: Jealous of rich people
Incel: Jealous of beautiful people

This is why the modern incel shouldn’t be conflated with the blackpill. They’re emotional womanlike creatures jfl
While the blackpill in theory, represents nihilistic stoicism. There’s absolutely no reason they should reproduce. The only way eugenics can occur naturally (and remain hidden so the average normie doesn’t recognize it as eugenics) is through hypergamy and abortion.

To be fair, you don’t have to be a leftist to acknowledge inequality. In fact, it’s mostly people on the right that reject blank slatism, and acknowledge genetic differences between genders, groups, and individuals. That being said, it is completely plausible and non contradictory for a leftist person to be a blackpiller.

The thing is it’s not really inequality, it’s meritocratic belief. You shouldn’t receive special treatment or handouts for traits or qualities you don’t possess

 

[gigacumster3000]

 

[theRetard]

This is why the modern incel shouldn’t be conflated with the blackpill. They’re emotional womanlike creatures jfl
While the blackpill in theory, represents nihilistic stoicism. There’s absolutely no reason they should reproduce. The only way eugenics can occur naturally (and remain hidden so the average normie doesn’t recognize it as eugenics) is through hypergamy and abortion.

The thing is it’s not really inequality, it’s meritocratic belief. You shouldn’t receive special treatment or handouts for traits or qualities you don’t possess

is inequality bad?

 

[iblamexyz]

Communists believe that 20% of the people have 80% of total wealth
Incels believe that 1% chads gets 100% women
Both argue that a small group of elites control entire/ majority limited resources. For communists, its the bourgeois and for incels, they are chads

Both think of means of production / dating more than those who can actually have access to them. They write theories or use mental gymnastics to cope with their unfortunate state of affairs.

But difference is Communists believe there should be a mass uprising against bourgeois and the dictatorship of the proletariat will prevail but Incels try to looksmax and be chad
View attachment 4051656View attachment 4051657

High iq greycel