thecel
morph king
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 24,034
- Reputation
- 50,706
In the incel community, genetic dead-end males support and stand up for one another like brothers, all united by the suffering of being sub-five. They utterly despise people who mistreat ugly men, and they don’t hesitate to strongly criticize the bullying of physically disadvantaged males. Their attitude toward the mistreatment and bullying of subhumans comes from the belief that shitting on someone for something they can’t control is wrong.
However, Incels.Is’s users’ views on LGBT people contradict the core values the community stands up for. See this thread:
incels.is
The members exhibited a very callous attitude toward the victim’s suffering, and some members even expressed admiration of the bully. Just because the boy was bullied for being gay rather than for being ugly. If the victim had instead been bullied for being ugly or short, the incel community would’ve shown sympathy to the victim and wished vengeance upon the bully.
Being ugly isn’t a choice, of course, but neither is having a homosexual orientation a choice. The way that the Incels.Is community reacted to the tragic outcome of the bullying (the victim committed suicide) shows that these forum members support each other out of tribalism and not out of true compassion for suffering people.
The appalling reaction of those members made my blood boil. Though that’s not the forum’s only big problem. Incels.Is’s rules always prohibited gay and trans content like Looksmax.org’s rules do. After Fat Link became admin, the rules were amended to prohibit LGBT members. IMO this new rule attempts to solve a nonexistent problem within the community and does more harm than good.
See this Incels.Is user get a permanent ban for admitting that he had some homoerotic thoughts:
incels.is
He didn’t promote faggotry or spread LGBT degeneracy. All he did is say he feels some attraction to males—attraction that he wants to get rid of. He’s actually anti-LGBT. He wants nothing to do with homosexuality. He wants to stop his gay thoughts. Despite the fact that he’s anti-gay, he got banned per the new rules.
A rule that bans LGBT people because they “can’t be incel” makes no sense. If you believe that homosexuality is bad for society, you believe that refraining from participating in homosexual activity is good. But if a bisexual man does what you believe to be the right thing, choosing to avoid homosexual activity, he still cannot join the forum. You think he should not do something, but you exclude him from your community because he still technically can do it. This is totally unfair. Straight men can have sex with men; they just don’t want to. But consider these: a gay man who believes that homosexuality is a sin doesn’t want to have sex with men, a gay man who lives in a country where homosexuality is illegal doesn’t want to have sex with men, and a “based” and conservative gay man who agrees with Incels.Is dogma doesn’t want to have sex with men. The rule is horseshit.
Stopping LGBT males from joining incel forums only increases homosexual activity, which incel forum members are opposed to. If a “based”, anti-LGBT bisexual man knows that he’ll never get accepted into the incel community, he might as well just stop being “based” and just gaymax anyway. Don’t the anti-LGBT Incels.Is members want to prevent this result from occurring?
Not only is the rule shit, the mods are more shit at enforcing it properly. The Incels.Is mods are emotional and opinionated in their rule enforcement. They should logically enforce the rules exactly according to the written rules, but they instead decide to act on emotion and disregard the actual rules.
A .is member received a 100% warning for suggesting a change to the rules:
The mod(s) banned him not for actually violating a rule but for posting something the mods didn’t like, as clearly shown by the reason “Ew” displayed in the warning banner. This emotional mod reaction is a feminine trait. Masculine mods moderate on logic; feminine mods moderate based on how they feel. Not being able to tolerate opinions one disagrees with is a mentally weak trait.
But if the mod action was actually done off of logic, the mod action sets a dangerous precedent. If it’s against the rules to say that something that’s currently disallowed should be allowed, then all proposed changes of the rules are against the rules. Then the people have no say in the rules. It’s complete and utter dogshit.
@8PSLcel @Xangsane
However, Incels.Is’s users’ views on LGBT people contradict the core values the community stands up for. See this thread:
Kids bully gay kid, cause him to rope.
View: https://youtu.be/uxI126PoPOU Nothing of value was lost here, the world should be purged of faggots. Good riddance.
incels.is
The members exhibited a very callous attitude toward the victim’s suffering, and some members even expressed admiration of the bully. Just because the boy was bullied for being gay rather than for being ugly. If the victim had instead been bullied for being ugly or short, the incel community would’ve shown sympathy to the victim and wished vengeance upon the bully.
Being ugly isn’t a choice, of course, but neither is having a homosexual orientation a choice. The way that the Incels.Is community reacted to the tragic outcome of the bullying (the victim committed suicide) shows that these forum members support each other out of tribalism and not out of true compassion for suffering people.
The appalling reaction of those members made my blood boil. Though that’s not the forum’s only big problem. Incels.Is’s rules always prohibited gay and trans content like Looksmax.org’s rules do. After Fat Link became admin, the rules were amended to prohibit LGBT members. IMO this new rule attempts to solve a nonexistent problem within the community and does more harm than good.
See this Incels.Is user get a permanent ban for admitting that he had some homoerotic thoughts:
how do i stop my gay thoughts?
not even joking or trying to be funny, im serious, i cant stop feeling like im attracted to guys jfl, its like sometimes ill feel gay and sometimes ill feel straight as fuck and want nothing to do with guys, irl i never have found a guy attractive but online it's different, all this rotting has...
incels.is
He didn’t promote faggotry or spread LGBT degeneracy. All he did is say he feels some attraction to males—attraction that he wants to get rid of. He’s actually anti-LGBT. He wants nothing to do with homosexuality. He wants to stop his gay thoughts. Despite the fact that he’s anti-gay, he got banned per the new rules.
A rule that bans LGBT people because they “can’t be incel” makes no sense. If you believe that homosexuality is bad for society, you believe that refraining from participating in homosexual activity is good. But if a bisexual man does what you believe to be the right thing, choosing to avoid homosexual activity, he still cannot join the forum. You think he should not do something, but you exclude him from your community because he still technically can do it. This is totally unfair. Straight men can have sex with men; they just don’t want to. But consider these: a gay man who believes that homosexuality is a sin doesn’t want to have sex with men, a gay man who lives in a country where homosexuality is illegal doesn’t want to have sex with men, and a “based” and conservative gay man who agrees with Incels.Is dogma doesn’t want to have sex with men. The rule is horseshit.
Stopping LGBT males from joining incel forums only increases homosexual activity, which incel forum members are opposed to. If a “based”, anti-LGBT bisexual man knows that he’ll never get accepted into the incel community, he might as well just stop being “based” and just gaymax anyway. Don’t the anti-LGBT Incels.Is members want to prevent this result from occurring?
Not only is the rule shit, the mods are more shit at enforcing it properly. The Incels.Is mods are emotional and opinionated in their rule enforcement. They should logically enforce the rules exactly according to the written rules, but they instead decide to act on emotion and disregard the actual rules.
A .is member received a 100% warning for suggesting a change to the rules:
The mod(s) banned him not for actually violating a rule but for posting something the mods didn’t like, as clearly shown by the reason “Ew” displayed in the warning banner. This emotional mod reaction is a feminine trait. Masculine mods moderate on logic; feminine mods moderate based on how they feel. Not being able to tolerate opinions one disagrees with is a mentally weak trait.
But if the mod action was actually done off of logic, the mod action sets a dangerous precedent. If it’s against the rules to say that something that’s currently disallowed should be allowed, then all proposed changes of the rules are against the rules. Then the people have no say in the rules. It’s complete and utter dogshit.
@8PSLcel @Xangsane
Last edited:
moderators ngl
