Incels.Is Is a Shit Site with Dogshit Rules and Horseshit Moderation

didnt read, but .is is dogshit. when i first found the blackpill, i found .is and most of it is just complete horseshit pedo posting or threads on why rape should be legal, etc.. etc.. i gained 0 from browsing that site for the few months that i did. the only good part about that site is the trolls sometimes, and them and IT going back and forth. yall remmeber that nigga mentalcel1 who would just spam all caps and pepe emojis, 5'2 norwooding and obese lmao
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore, gymmaxedhorse and thecel
Behead faggots
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: thecel
In the incel community, genetic dead-end males support and stand up for one another like brothers, all united by the suffering of being sub-five. They utterly despise people who mistreat ugly men, and they don’t hesitate to strongly criticize the bullying of physically disadvantaged males. Their attitude toward the mistreatment and bullying of subhumans comes from the belief that shitting on someone for something they can’t control is wrong.

However, Incels.Is’s users’ views on LGBT people contradict the core values the community stands up for. See this thread:


The members exhibited a very callous attitude toward the victim’s suffering, and some members even expressed admiration of the bully. Just because the boy was bullied for being gay rather than for being ugly. If the victim had instead been bullied for being ugly or short, the incel community would’ve shown sympathy to the victim and wished vengeance upon the bully.

Being ugly isn’t a choice, of course, but neither is having a homosexual orientation a choice. The way that the Incels.Is community reacted to the tragic outcome of the bullying (the victim committed suicide) shows that these forum members support each other out of tribalism and not out of true compassion for suffering people.

The appalling reaction of those members made my blood boil. Though that’s not the forum’s only big problem. Incels.Is’s rules always prohibited gay and trans content like Looksmax.org’s rules do. After Fat Link became admin, the rules were amended to prohibit LGBT members. IMO this new rule attempts to solve a nonexistent problem within the community and does more harm than good.

See this Incels.Is user get a permanent ban for admitting that he had some homoerotic thoughts:


He didn’t promote faggotry or spread LGBT degeneracy. All he did is say he feels some attraction to males—attraction that he wants to get rid of. He’s actually anti-LGBT. He wants nothing to do with homosexuality. He wants to stop his gay thoughts. Despite the fact that he’s anti-gay, he got banned per the new rules.

A rule that bans LGBT people because they “can’t be incel” makes no sense. If you believe that homosexuality is bad for society, you believe that refraining from participating in homosexual activity is good. But if a bisexual man does what you believe to be the right thing, choosing to avoid homosexual activity, he still cannot join the forum. You think he should not do something, but you exclude him from your community because he still technically can do it. This is totally unfair. Straight men can have sex with men; they just don’t want to. But consider these: a gay man who believes that homosexuality is a sin doesn’t want to have sex with men, a gay man who lives in a country where homosexuality is illegal doesn’t want to have sex with men, and a “based” and conservative gay man who agrees with Incels.Is dogma doesn’t want to have sex with men. The rule is horseshit.

Stopping LGBT males from joining incel forums only increases homosexual activity, which incel forum members are opposed to. If a “based”, anti-LGBT bisexual man knows that he’ll never get accepted into the incel community, he might as well just stop being “based” and just gaymax anyway. Don’t the anti-LGBT Incels.Is members want to prevent this result from occurring?

Not only is the rule shit, the mods are more shit at enforcing it properly. The Incels.Is mods are emotional and opinionated in their rule enforcement. They should logically enforce the rules exactly according to the written rules, but they instead decide to act on emotion and disregard the actual rules.

A .is member received a 100% warning for suggesting a change to the rules:



The mod(s) banned him not for actually violating a rule but for posting something the mods didn’t like, as clearly shown by the reason “Ew” displayed in the warning banner. This emotional mod reaction is a feminine trait. Masculine mods moderate on logic; feminine mods moderate based on how they feel. Not being able to tolerate opinions one disagrees with is a mentally weak trait.

But if the mod action was actually done off of logic, the mod action sets a dangerous precedent. If it’s against the rules to say that something that’s currently disallowed should be allowed, then all proposed changes of the rules are against the rules. Then the people have no say in the rules. It’s complete and utter dogshit.



@8PSLcel @Xangsane


The idea behind incels is that it should be a safe space for ugly straight males. I think it is reasonable to get rid of everyone who does not belong to that group. Also when you sign up there you know what kind of people are there and you'd expect them not to treat you fairly all the time. I must agree though that the rules on that site are sometimes taken too seriously. It feels like you have to subscribe EXACTLY to the owner's worldview in order to survive on that site which of course is BS. On the other hand it ensures that the community does not develop into the wrong direction. A German incel site I know turned into a place where normie roasties make fun of losers who are too cucked to even realize it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore, Deleted member 16275 and thecel
closet gay complaining about not being allowed to be gay on an incel forum LOL
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore, thecel, Deleted member 20679 and 2 others
everyone on that forum is so hateful and strange. imo they are not good representatives of inceldom.
 
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel
byeah no shit. Your looks determine your personality. Ofc a forum full of ugly people would have an ugly culture.

Looksmax is full of chadlites so our culture is based.
Did you just call me a chadlite?
Blushing GIF
 
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel and Deleted member 17791
neither is having a homosexual orientation a choice.
This is debatable.

Even if it wasn’t though, it wouldn’t matter, as being openly gay is a choice. You can’t hide being ugly, but you can hide being gay.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
In the incel community, genetic dead-end males support and stand up for one another like brothers, all united by the suffering of being sub-five. They utterly despise people who mistreat ugly men, and they don’t hesitate to strongly criticize the bullying of physically disadvantaged males. Their attitude toward the mistreatment and bullying of subhumans comes from the belief that shitting on someone for something they can’t control is wrong.

However, Incels.Is’s users’ views on LGBT people contradict the core values the community stands up for. See this thread:


The members exhibited a very callous attitude toward the victim’s suffering, and some members even expressed admiration of the bully. Just because the boy was bullied for being gay rather than for being ugly. If the victim had instead been bullied for being ugly or short, the incel community would’ve shown sympathy to the victim and wished vengeance upon the bully.

Being ugly isn’t a choice, of course, but neither is having a homosexual orientation a choice. The way that the Incels.Is community reacted to the tragic outcome of the bullying (the victim committed suicide) shows that these forum members support each other out of tribalism and not out of true compassion for suffering people.

The appalling reaction of those members made my blood boil. Though that’s not the forum’s only big problem. Incels.Is’s rules always prohibited gay and trans content like Looksmax.org’s rules do. After Fat Link became admin, the rules were amended to prohibit LGBT members. IMO this new rule attempts to solve a nonexistent problem within the community and does more harm than good.

See this Incels.Is user get a permanent ban for admitting that he had some homoerotic thoughts:


He didn’t promote faggotry or spread LGBT degeneracy. All he did is say he feels some attraction to males—attraction that he wants to get rid of. He’s actually anti-LGBT. He wants nothing to do with homosexuality. He wants to stop his gay thoughts. Despite the fact that he’s anti-gay, he got banned per the new rules.

A rule that bans LGBT people because they “can’t be incel” makes no sense. If you believe that homosexuality is bad for society, you believe that refraining from participating in homosexual activity is good. But if a bisexual man does what you believe to be the right thing, choosing to avoid homosexual activity, he still cannot join the forum. You think he should not do something, but you exclude him from your community because he still technically can do it. This is totally unfair. Straight men can have sex with men; they just don’t want to. But consider these: a gay man who believes that homosexuality is a sin doesn’t want to have sex with men, a gay man who lives in a country where homosexuality is illegal doesn’t want to have sex with men, and a “based” and conservative gay man who agrees with Incels.Is dogma doesn’t want to have sex with men. The rule is horseshit.

Stopping LGBT males from joining incel forums only increases homosexual activity, which incel forum members are opposed to. If a “based”, anti-LGBT bisexual man knows that he’ll never get accepted into the incel community, he might as well just stop being “based” and just gaymax anyway. Don’t the anti-LGBT Incels.Is members want to prevent this result from occurring?

Not only is the rule shit, the mods are more shit at enforcing it properly. The Incels.Is mods are emotional and opinionated in their rule enforcement. They should logically enforce the rules exactly according to the written rules, but they instead decide to act on emotion and disregard the actual rules.

A .is member received a 100% warning for suggesting a change to the rules:



The mod(s) banned him not for actually violating a rule but for posting something the mods didn’t like, as clearly shown by the reason “Ew” displayed in the warning banner. This emotional mod reaction is a feminine trait. Masculine mods moderate on logic; feminine mods moderate based on how they feel. Not being able to tolerate opinions one disagrees with is a mentally weak trait.

But if the mod action was actually done off of logic, the mod action sets a dangerous precedent. If it’s against the rules to say that something that’s currently disallowed should be allowed, then all proposed changes of the rules are against the rules. Then the people have no say in the rules. It’s complete and utter dogshit.



@8PSLcel @Xangsane
Cope they are bazed
Fuck LGBTROONS and faggotz
 
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel
In the incel community, genetic dead-end males support and stand up for one another like brothers, all united by the suffering of being sub-five. They utterly despise people who mistreat ugly men, and they don’t hesitate to strongly criticize the bullying of physically disadvantaged males. Their attitude toward the mistreatment and bullying of subhumans comes from the belief that shitting on someone for something they can’t control is wrong.

However, Incels.Is’s users’ views on LGBT people contradict the core values the community stands up for. See this thread:


The members exhibited a very callous attitude toward the victim’s suffering, and some members even expressed admiration of the bully. Just because the boy was bullied for being gay rather than for being ugly. If the victim had instead been bullied for being ugly or short, the incel community would’ve shown sympathy to the victim and wished vengeance upon the bully.

Being ugly isn’t a choice, of course, but neither is having a homosexual orientation a choice. The way that the Incels.Is community reacted to the tragic outcome of the bullying (the victim committed suicide) shows that these forum members support each other out of tribalism and not out of true compassion for suffering people.

The appalling reaction of those members made my blood boil. Though that’s not the forum’s only big problem. Incels.Is’s rules always prohibited gay and trans content like Looksmax.org’s rules do. After Fat Link became admin, the rules were amended to prohibit LGBT members. IMO this new rule attempts to solve a nonexistent problem within the community and does more harm than good.

See this Incels.Is user get a permanent ban for admitting that he had some homoerotic thoughts:


He didn’t promote faggotry or spread LGBT degeneracy. All he did is say he feels some attraction to males—attraction that he wants to get rid of. He’s actually anti-LGBT. He wants nothing to do with homosexuality. He wants to stop his gay thoughts. Despite the fact that he’s anti-gay, he got banned per the new rules.

A rule that bans LGBT people because they “can’t be incel” makes no sense. If you believe that homosexuality is bad for society, you believe that refraining from participating in homosexual activity is good. But if a bisexual man does what you believe to be the right thing, choosing to avoid homosexual activity, he still cannot join the forum. You think he should not do something, but you exclude him from your community because he still technically can do it. This is totally unfair. Straight men can have sex with men; they just don’t want to. But consider these: a gay man who believes that homosexuality is a sin doesn’t want to have sex with men, a gay man who lives in a country where homosexuality is illegal doesn’t want to have sex with men, and a “based” and conservative gay man who agrees with Incels.Is dogma doesn’t want to have sex with men. The rule is horseshit.

Stopping LGBT males from joining incel forums only increases homosexual activity, which incel forum members are opposed to. If a “based”, anti-LGBT bisexual man knows that he’ll never get accepted into the incel community, he might as well just stop being “based” and just gaymax anyway. Don’t the anti-LGBT Incels.Is members want to prevent this result from occurring?

Not only is the rule shit, the mods are more shit at enforcing it properly. The Incels.Is mods are emotional and opinionated in their rule enforcement. They should logically enforce the rules exactly according to the written rules, but they instead decide to act on emotion and disregard the actual rules.

A .is member received a 100% warning for suggesting a change to the rules:



The mod(s) banned him not for actually violating a rule but for posting something the mods didn’t like, as clearly shown by the reason “Ew” displayed in the warning banner. This emotional mod reaction is a feminine trait. Masculine mods moderate on logic; feminine mods moderate based on how they feel. Not being able to tolerate opinions one disagrees with is a mentally weak trait.

But if the mod action was actually done off of logic, the mod action sets a dangerous precedent. If it’s against the rules to say that something that’s currently disallowed should be allowed, then all proposed changes of the rules are against the rules. Then the people have no say in the rules. It’s complete and utter dogshit.



@8PSLcel @Xangsane
Cringe shit, can't believe u buy into the whole genetic gay thing. It's a choice.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
Fuck those who make fun of us for improving and maxxing out our lives may they go to hell
 
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel
This is debatable.

Even if it wasn’t though, it wouldn’t matter, as being openly gay is a choice. You can’t hide being ugly, but you can hide being gay.

You can hide being ugly on forums.
 
Cringe shit, can't believe u buy into the whole genetic gay thing. It's a choice.

Cringe at the copers here who think everything is either genetic or voluntary. Some things are neither!
 
it's also just boring, it's just people whining and complaining or people saying "ok GrAYcel"

at least this forum has entertaining jesters.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Deleted member 16369
You can hide being ugly on forums.
You are such a fucking pussy who is evasive. The comparison refers to real life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
You are such a fucking pussy who is evasive. The comparison refers to real life.

Your comparison is irrelevant to Incels.is then.
 
never been there thankfully
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: thecel
Cringe shit, can't believe u buy into the whole genetic gay thing. It's a choice.

What about the environmental gay thing?
 
In the incel community, genetic dead-end males support and stand up for one another like brothers, all united by the suffering of being sub-five. They utterly despise people who mistreat ugly men, and they don’t hesitate to strongly criticize the bullying of physically disadvantaged males. Their attitude toward the mistreatment and bullying of subhumans comes from the belief that shitting on someone for something they can’t control is wrong.

However, Incels.Is’s users’ views on LGBT people contradict the core values the community stands up for. See this thread:


The members exhibited a very callous attitude toward the victim’s suffering, and some members even expressed admiration of the bully. Just because the boy was bullied for being gay rather than for being ugly. If the victim had instead been bullied for being ugly or short, the incel community would’ve shown sympathy to the victim and wished vengeance upon the bully.

Being ugly isn’t a choice, of course, but neither is having a homosexual orientation a choice. The way that the Incels.Is community reacted to the tragic outcome of the bullying (the victim committed suicide) shows that these forum members support each other out of tribalism and not out of true compassion for suffering people.

The appalling reaction of those members made my blood boil. Though that’s not the forum’s only big problem. Incels.Is’s rules always prohibited gay and trans content like Looksmax.org’s rules do. After Fat Link became admin, the rules were amended to prohibit LGBT members. IMO this new rule attempts to solve a nonexistent problem within the community and does more harm than good.

See this Incels.Is user get a permanent ban for admitting that he had some homoerotic thoughts:


He didn’t promote faggotry or spread LGBT degeneracy. All he did is say he feels some attraction to males—attraction that he wants to get rid of. He’s actually anti-LGBT. He wants nothing to do with homosexuality. He wants to stop his gay thoughts. Despite the fact that he’s anti-gay, he got banned per the new rules.

A rule that bans LGBT people because they “can’t be incel” makes no sense. If you believe that homosexuality is bad for society, you believe that refraining from participating in homosexual activity is good. But if a bisexual man does what you believe to be the right thing, choosing to avoid homosexual activity, he still cannot join the forum. You think he should not do something, but you exclude him from your community because he still technically can do it. This is totally unfair. Straight men can have sex with men; they just don’t want to. But consider these: a gay man who believes that homosexuality is a sin doesn’t want to have sex with men, a gay man who lives in a country where homosexuality is illegal doesn’t want to have sex with men, and a “based” and conservative gay man who agrees with Incels.Is dogma doesn’t want to have sex with men. The rule is horseshit.

Stopping LGBT males from joining incel forums only increases homosexual activity, which incel forum members are opposed to. If a “based”, anti-LGBT bisexual man knows that he’ll never get accepted into the incel community, he might as well just stop being “based” and just gaymax anyway. Don’t the anti-LGBT Incels.Is members want to prevent this result from occurring?

Not only is the rule shit, the mods are more shit at enforcing it properly. The Incels.Is mods are emotional and opinionated in their rule enforcement. They should logically enforce the rules exactly according to the written rules, but they instead decide to act on emotion and disregard the actual rules.

A .is member received a 100% warning for suggesting a change to the rules:



The mod(s) banned him not for actually violating a rule but for posting something the mods didn’t like, as clearly shown by the reason “Ew” displayed in the warning banner. This emotional mod reaction is a feminine trait. Masculine mods moderate on logic; feminine mods moderate based on how they feel. Not being able to tolerate opinions one disagrees with is a mentally weak trait.

But if the mod action was actually done off of logic, the mod action sets a dangerous precedent. If it’s against the rules to say that something that’s currently disallowed should be allowed, then all proposed changes of the rules are against the rules. Then the people have no say in the rules. It’s complete and utter dogshit.



@8PSLcel @Xangsane
High iq
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
You get banned there if you ever so much as hold a girl's hand when you were 5.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ItsOver999 and thecel
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19499
What about the environmental gay thing?
Obviously that’s the biggest factor. People get all sorts of weird messed up fetishes. If people can develop a feisty for shit idk why they can’t develop one for being a faggot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

Spidermanne2returns
Replies
16
Views
3K
Flawless_fliy
Flawless_fliy
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
21
Views
4K
wannabe_mogger
W
Nazi Germany
Replies
32
Views
1K
(In)CelibatePsycho2
I
Acion
Replies
18
Views
2K
Pikabro
Pikabro

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top