Inciting violence (especially against those in positions of authority) should be considered an integral part of free speech.

Aladin

Aladin

Kraken
Joined
Jul 20, 2022
Posts
8,004
Reputation
8,745
This includes celebrating violence after the fact and saying victims “deserved it.”

It should also include rewarding those who are imprisoned with high amenities and rewarding their families with luxury, so as to encourage further violence.
 
  • +1
Reactions: IwillRope2024 and Xtra
Bump

@john2 @MoggerGaston @Xtra @ElTruecel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xtra, ElTruecel and MoggerGaston
Let's first give truecels like us state-subsidized stacy escorts as a way to compensate for our incel suffering.

Then lets do your idea afterwards.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: john2, Manletmachine, 5'7 zoomer and 1 other person
Let's first give truecels like us state-subsidized stacy escorts as a way to compensate for our incel suffering.

Then lets do your idea afterwards.
Nope, because those escorts won’t satisfy us in the same way.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer
stop trying to de escalate from violent means
Not interested in participating in modern warfare where countries are producing millions of FPV drones per year.
And some military cucks are going to control them from their basement and kill you.



But I wish you all the best
 
Not interested in participating in modern warfare where countries are producing millions of FPV drones per year.
And some military cucks are going to control them from their basement and kill you.



But I wish you all the best

Nah you’re a cuck trying to be nice. You should be promoting violence happily. It’s not like you have anything great to live for.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Manletmachine
Nah you’re a cuck trying to be nice. You should be promoting violence happily. It’s not like you have anything great to live for.
you're in a bad mood today bhai.

hope better times coming for you
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Manletmachine
you're in a bad mood today bhai.

hope better times coming for you
Nope I’ve advocated for this before.

You just are clinging onto being a normie (you can’t btw).
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Manletmachine
Why would the authorities protect your right to incite violence against them?
 
Brabdenburg vs. Ohio
Are you trying to argue that it should be free speech?

Why would the people in power allow you to try and take them out of power by inciting violence against them?
 
Yes.

You are shifting the point. You’re diverting the topic.
I’m not. You’re talking about free speech, which is irrelevant. Yeah technically you’re right it should be free speech, but it’s not because free speech is a meme.
 
I’m not. You’re talking about free speech, which is irrelevant. Yeah technically you’re right it should be free speech, but it’s not because free speech is a meme.
You don’t know what free speech is.
 
You don’t know what free speech is.
do you actually believe in free speech as some sort of external thing that actually exists?

Are you messing with me?
 
do you actually believe in free speech as some sort of external thing that actually exists?

Are you messing with me?
Define what you think is free speech.

You’re probably someone who believes it’s just the first amendment.
 
This includes celebrating violence after the fact and saying victims “deserved it.”

It should also include rewarding those who are imprisoned with high amenities and rewarding their families with luxury, so as to encourage further violence.
For sure, too many people claim to support free speech but they don’t
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aladin

Similar threads

Subhra26
Replies
37
Views
2K
looksmaxxed
looksmaxxed
LegitUser
Replies
55
Views
4K
perpetuallytired
perpetuallytired
NT Master
Replies
4
Views
661
cromagnon
cromagnon
heightmaxxing
Replies
39
Views
3K
blurazice
blurazice

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top