Indian and Afghan mixing isn't race mixing in the proper concept

[reptiles]

2 reasons why.

1. They share overall genetic closeness, though the distance is quite large if you compare it with others. Even among ethnics, your more Afghan-shifted “deathnic curries” like Tamils are 2x closer to Afghans than Northern Europeans are, 4x closer than any Southeast Asian, and 8x closer than any African.



The two groups share the same root DNA. What differs is the AASI (Australoid South Indian) admixture, which holds Indians back from "mogging" as hard as Afghans. I've seen non-Euro-looking Afghans with extremely robust bone structure.

The difference lies in proportions: Afghans have around 10–15% AASI, while Indians average around 50%. This means any mixture between the two would be so genetically similar that you literally couldn't tell the difference. Because of this, I don’t count Indian-Afghan mixing as real race mixing. True race mixing would be between an Indian and a European, East Asian, or Sub-Saharan African.

2. Their phenotypes overlap due to shared Iran Neolithic and Steppe ancestry. Even though it's higher in Pashtuns, it's still present in Indians. That’s why you see phenotype overlap — something you don’t really see between most Indians and East Asians or Indians and Europeans. You do see white-passing Afghans, but you also see white-passing Indians if they are depigmented. Overall, Indian facial structure is closer to Pashtuns, while Afghan faces lean more Persian.



Because of all this, I don’t consider mixing between the average Indian and Afghan to be actual race mixing — unless it’s someone with heavy AASI like a Paniya. Don’t get me wrong, AASI types can "mog" too, but they have weaker features on average. Indians with more Afghan blood tend to mog more often. You can see this clearly in groups like Jatts and Khatris, who show more Afghan-shifted phenotypes and are genetically around 75% similar to Afghans. The average Tamil, by comparison, is around 50%.


What are your thoughts
@chaddyboi66
@Jason Voorhees

 

[reptiles]

How the fuck did you leave JFl if your banned

 

[reptiles]

@Gengar why the hell did you leave a vomit icon are you ignorant in the DNA we share the same 3 components afghans have it higher but just doing maths even the most deathnic curry if he mixes will be 75 percent Afghan which doesn't show in the face

 

[greycel]

Even if this is true, how do you determine what’s sufficient enough to be allowed for “racemixing”
I’ll personally discourage this because of the clashing cultures/traditions/religions, more than how much the genome differs

As a rule of thumb, I think it’s best if everybody stayed to their own country

 

[reptiles]

Even if this is true, how do you determine what’s sufficient enough to be allowed for “racemixing”
I’ll personally discourage this because of the clashing cultures/traditions/religions, more than how much the genome differs

As a rule of thumb, I think it’s best if everybody stayed to their own country

I base it of this all Indians are on a cline but you can clearly see a gulf between euros and Indians yet all Indians are shifted in the direction of Persians we already have the genetic base because our DNA is so similar what stops us is the AASI meanwhile we share no DNA similar to Europeans

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

I’m 100% pure Tamil Dravidian and I want Afghan wife

 

[reptiles]

I’m 100% pure Tamil Dravidian and I want Afghan wife

Saar

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Indian and Afghan populations share some genetic ancestry this is water.. Phenotypic overlaps are natural among neighboring regions, but using these overlaps to create hierarchies or make value judgments is kinda retarded @the_machinist_786

 

[reptiles]

Indian and Afghan populations share some genetic ancestry this is water.. Phenotypic overlaps are natural among neighboring regions, but using these overlaps to create hierarchies or make value judgments is kinda retarded @the_machinist_786

It's not hierarchies it's pointing out there is a connection between the 2 and there is no connection between Indians and any other race so it is fair to say in terms racial clustering on a global scale they are closer to afghans which matches my anti race mixing ideals

 

[Orthognathic]

 

[javen1384]

It's not hierarchies it's pointing out there is a connection between the 2 and there is no connection between Indians and any other race so it is fair to say in terms racial clustering on a global scale they are closer to afghans which matches my anti race mixing ideals

Indians are asian saar

 

[True truecel]

View attachment 3765952



I base it of this all Indians are on a cline but you can clearly see a gulf between euros and Indians yet all Indians are shifted in the direction of Persians we already have the genetic base because our DNA is so similar what stops us is the AASI meanwhile we share no DNA similar to Europeans

So like

This thread is all right as far as I’m considered

But there’s a very crucial distinction that I think people will never be able to grasp for the next few decades - the difference between race and ethnic groups

We’ve all heard the tales of how two Nigerian tribes are more genetically distant from each other than they are to some Indian guy from Kerala.

And since race isn’t an actual biologically based concept, it is only a social construct. It’s a good social construct though, there’s nothing inherently wrong with grouping people who look the same together

However the issue arises when we confuse genetic diversity with physical traits. Highly doubt this confusion will ever go away, people are just hardwired to think tribalistically like this

 

[garoutheincelReturn]

2 reasons why.

1. They share overall genetic closeness, though the distance is quite large if you compare it with others. Even among ethnics, your more Afghan-shifted “deathnic curries” like Tamils are 2x closer to Afghans than Northern Europeans are, 4x closer than any Southeast Asian, and 8x closer than any African.



The two groups share the same root DNA. What differs is the AASI (Australoid South Indian) admixture, which holds Indians back from "mogging" as hard as Afghans. I've seen non-Euro-looking Afghans with extremely robust bone structure.

The difference lies in proportions: Afghans have around 10–15% AASI, while Indians average around 50%. This means any mixture between the two would be so genetically similar that you literally couldn't tell the difference. Because of this, I don’t count Indian-Afghan mixing as real race mixing. True race mixing would be between an Indian and a European, East Asian, or Sub-Saharan African.

2. Their phenotypes overlap due to shared Iran Neolithic and Steppe ancestry. Even though it's higher in Pashtuns, it's still present in Indians. That’s why you see phenotype overlap — something you don’t really see between most Indians and East Asians or Indians and Europeans. You do see white-passing Afghans, but you also see white-passing Indians if they are depigmented. Overall, Indian facial structure is closer to Pashtuns, while Afghan faces lean more Persian.



Because of all this, I don’t consider mixing between the average Indian and Afghan to be actual race mixing — unless it’s someone with heavy AASI like a Paniya. Don’t get me wrong, AASI types can "mog" too, but they have weaker features on average. Indians with more Afghan blood tend to mog more often. You can see this clearly in groups like Jatts and Khatris, who show more Afghan-shifted phenotypes and are genetically around 75% similar to Afghans. The average Tamil, by comparison, is around 50%.


What are your thoughts
@chaddyboi66
@Jason Voorhees

The only afghans are pashtuns and pashtuns share insignificant amount of AASI only some do because they had indian concubines that doesn't mean we will racemix with jeets lmfao , the AASI we get isn't from dravidians from brahui/concubines