unstable
Saintmaxxer loves all forumers
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2025
- Posts
- 3,452
- Reputation
- 4,560
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Probably orientalist cherrypickingThey seem decently developed and robust.

They don't look powerful more like malnourishedView attachment 5480273
Indian ploughers 1946
They are closer to lean since their abs are protruding.They don't look powerful more like malnourished
Why though? gangetic mesolithic hunter gatherers were taller than modern Europeans and also had robust features. I think it is due to protein, northern states have milk and coastal regions have fish.Extreme South indians and extreme North indians (haryanvi jaats punjabi jatt kashmiri) mog
I am not well aware of South Asian genetics the only thing I know is that South asians have steepe, aasi, and iranian zagro ancestey, what's gangetics meolithic hunter gathereres?Why though? gangetic mesolithic hunter gatherers were taller than modern Europeans and also had robust features. I think it is due to protein, northern states have milk and coastal regions have fish.
Mostly aasi. We even found a 6ft+ woman in sarai nahar along with tall height across different excavations average is 5'9 to 6.I am not well aware of South Asian genetics the only thing I know is that South asians have steepe, aasi, and iranian zagro ancestey, what's gangetics meolithic hunter gathereres?
So were the people with more aasi genetics taller than the people with more steepe genetics?Mostly aasi. We even found a 6ft+ woman in sarai nahar along with tall height across different excavations average is 5'9 to 6.
Possibly similar in height slightly taller, but we are only looking at samples from Gangetic regions we need more samples from other regions to form an opinion.So were the people with more aasi genetics taller than the people with more steepe genetics?