indians are just europeans with dark skin

Indians are just europeans with darker skin


  • Total voters
    24
Manchild_v2

Manchild_v2

He/Him | Muslim | Zionist | Latinx | Black ✊🏿
Joined
Feb 5, 2025
Posts
4,941
Reputation
7,028
yes or no
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MiserableMan, Klasik616, aladdinmaxxer and 2 others
Yes
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: anxiety, aDifferentPerspect and Manchild_v2
Or maybe no
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: anxiety and Manchild_v2
Indians have light skin.
The thread should be called "Indians are just Europeans"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: aloooeJIEEES and Manchild_v2
  • +1
Reactions: heightmaxxing
Yeah, it’s pretty obvious that most of them atleast in the north have european/caucasoid features due to the indo-european admixture. The only thing that’s really holding them back is the PR-disaster their countries reputation has and the deep rooted colourism not only in the west but in India too.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: aDifferentPerspect, MiserableMan and Manchild_v2
Yeah, it’s pretty obvious that most of them atleast in the north have european/caucasoid features due to the indo-european admixture. The only thing that’s really holding them back is the PR-disaster their countries reputation has and the deep rooted colourism not only in the west but in India too.
Indians have the same features as white people
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Klasik616
Indians have the same features as white people
Screenshot 20250603 135148 Reddit

Screenshot 2025 04 26 17 31 47 654 comdiscord
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Remeliawpckhardt, soggra and SheafCohomology
Caucasoid yes but not european. Europeans have longer midface, high hairlines, straighter more slender noses, thinner lips, bigger chins, narrower faces, stronger browridge and more deep set eyes. Some Indians can have all these things also and do look like whites dipped in chocolate but European and Indian skulls have their differences despite belonging to the same Caucasoid family.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Remeliawpckhardt and MiserableMan
Caucasoid yes but not european. Europeans have longer midface, high hairlines, straighter more slender noses, thinner lips, bigger chins, narrower faces, stronger browridge and more deep set eyes. Some Indians can have all these things also and do look like whites dipped in chocolate but European and Indian skulls have their differences despite belonging to the same Caucasoid family.
No, caucasoid implies iranians, arabs and ethopians and somalis. they dont look european at all.

These people look less european than indians even if those west asians have lighter skin
 
europeans are indians with light skin :feelshah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Manchild_v2 and soggra
Yeah, it’s pretty obvious that most of them atleast in the north have european/caucasoid features due to the indo-european admixture. The only thing that’s really holding them back is the PR-disaster their countries reputation has and the deep rooted colourism not only in the west but in India too.
Dravidian the ones that dont have that aboriginal blood the ones that only have the hunter gather have skulls closer to northern euro. The North Indians often have semantic/arab skulls and have hooked noses, etc. @the_machinist_786
 
  • +1
Reactions: the_machinist_786
Indians look like the worst kind of latinos, they're only above blacks.
 
Race classifications can be weird. They're not European ok but they're Asian? Tf
 
No, caucasoid implies iranians, arabs and ethopians and somalis. they dont look european at all.

These people look less european than indians even if those west asians have lighter skin
Nigga that isnt how it works. Caucasoid is an umbrella term for everything that includes a wide range of populations from Europe West Asia, North Africa, and South Asia based on loose skeletal and genetic similarities not actual appearance.

Being "Caucasoid" doesn't mean looking Europea it just means sharing distant West Eurasian ancestry.
 
Dravidian the ones that dont have that aboriginal blood the ones that only have the hunter gather have skulls closer to northern euro. The North Indians often have semantic/arab skulls and have hooked noses, etc. @the_machinist_786
Really? From my experience it’s usually the opposite. It may be flawed but looking at famous bollywood actors i could swear alot of them look closer phenotypically to southern europeans. And the Dravidians have features closer to Austronesians more than anything. But if it’s skulls we’re talking then maybe? The same enviromental pressures are present in both groupes giving them similar skulls.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and Jason Voorhees
Caucasoid yes but not european. Europeans have longer midface, high hairlines, straighter more slender noses, thinner lips, bigger chins, narrower faces, stronger browridge and more deep set eyes. Some Indians can have all these things also and do look like whites dipped in chocolate but European and Indian skulls have their differences despite belonging to the same Caucasoid family.
Yall look the same to me lol
 
Really? From my experience it’s usually the opposite. It may be flawed but looking at famous bollywood actors i could swear alot of them look closer phenotypically to southern europeans. And the Dravidians have features closer to Austronesians more than anything. But if it’s skulls we’re talking then maybe? The same enviromental pressures are present in both groupes giving them similar skulls.
I am specifically talking about the unmixed ones. The ones that dont have the aboriginal component. And yes they can look southern european but they never resemble northern europeans and have straight up white skulls that dravidians sometimes have. Look up albino dravidians and you'll get what I am saying they look like swedes, Scottish or something
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and ihateexplaining
Nigga that isnt how it works. Caucasoid is an umbrella term for everything that includes a wide range of populations from Europe West Asia, North Africa, and South Asia based on loose skeletal and genetic similarities not actual appearance.

Being "Caucasoid" doesn't mean looking Europea it just means sharing distant West Eurasian ancestry.
Dravidians or Horn africans have zero west eurasian ancestry. Chinese people and central asians especially have much more than both groups.

hell, most kazahks have more west eurasian ancestry than northern indians but they dont look european
 
  • +1
Reactions: Abhi1234
Dravidians or Horn africans have zero west eurasian ancestry. Chinese people and central asians especially have much more than both groups.

hell, most kazahks have more west eurasian ancestry than northern indians but they dont look european
Are you baiting for replies or something this is false Dravidians have West Eurasian ancestry mainly from ancient Iranian farmer groups that mixed with the native AASI populations thousands of years ago. In some brahmin groups in the south it is even significant. Same with Horn Africans like Somalis and Ethiopians they've had gene flow from the Middle East for ages, which shows up as West Eurasian DNA in their genomes. And yeah, Kazakhs do have a lot of West Eurasian ancestry, but they also have heavy East Asian and Siberian influence, which affects how they look. Just having more West Eurasian DNA doesn't automatically make someone look European it's all about the mix and how those traits get expressed. @the_machinist_786
 
  • +1
Reactions: the_machinist_786 and 5foot4currycel
Are you baiting for replies or something this is false Dravidians a have West Eurasian ancestry mainly from ancient Iranian farmer groups that mixed with the native AASI populations thousands of years ago. It's not zero. Same with Horn Africans like Somalis and Ethiopians they've had gene flow from the Middle East for ages, which shows up as West Eurasian DNA in their genomes. And yeah, Kazakhs do have a lot of West Eurasian ancestry, but they also have heavy East Asian and Siberian influence, which affects how they look. Just having more West Eurasian DNA doesn't automatically make someone look European it's all about the mix and how those traits get expressed. @the_machinist_786
its because the european mix in indians is recent. and no, somalis have no west eurasian influence, some ethopians do though. Pure dravidians like sri lankans have no more west eurasian ancestry than a mongol for example
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Abhi1234, 5foot4currycel and Jason Voorhees

Similar threads

Saint Casanova
Replies
4
Views
62
kjpness
kjpness
Jaynoyn523
Replies
6
Views
129
Chadington
Chadington
ScientificLooksmax
Replies
9
Views
161
Debetro
Debetro
SamosaChutneyCel
Replies
4
Views
270
javen1384
J
trualive
Replies
10
Views
380
AverageCurryEnjoyer
AverageCurryEnjoyer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top