Indians have smaller brains -- study reveals.

[DOggo]

Iranians and turks are west asian they are not genetically close to indians and pakistanis.They don't even have australoid ancestry.

None of the aforementioned countries have 'Australoid' ancestry, you fucking mong. Get basic genetics right before you start talking shit.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

None of the aforementioned countries have 'Australoid' ancestry, you fucking mong. Get basic genetics right before you start talking shit.

south asian hunter gatherers were australoid you retard. do these people look caucasian to you?

 

[DOggo]

south asian hunter gatherers were australoid you retard. do these people look caucasian to you?
View attachment 149731

Holy shit, you're fucking stupid. The ignore button would be beneficial in this case. Enjoy being a mong, this high IQ Paki--who mogs you--will be laughing.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

Blacks have to have smaller brains

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Holy shit, you're fucking stupid. The ignore button would be beneficial in this case. Enjoy being a mong, this high IQ Paki, who mogs you, will be laughing.

ran out of arguments,now?

 

[Deleted member 1546]

they are not,this is what average indian is like.
View attachment 149646



top 1 percent indians with highest iq and education move to western countries to be doctors and engineers.

Using low caste South Indians to represent Indians as a whole is like using gingers to represent whites.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Using low caste South Indians to represent Indians as a whole is like using gingers to represent whites.

What's wrong with gingers?

 

[DOggo]

ran out of arguments,now?

A simple wiki article would suffice in such a situation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia. No where, absolutely no where, does it mention ASI being Australoid in nature.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

What's wrong with gingers?

Well they are the ugliest out of whites like low caste South Indians are the ugliest out of south Asians

Notice there is 1.3B people so its not hard to find 10 millions people with higher iq.

High caste Indians (Brahmins) still IQ mog all ethnics except northeast Asians

 

[DOggo]

Well they are the ugliest out of whites like low caste South Indians are the ugliest out of south Asians

That hurt, my grandfather had ginger hair. South Indians are pretty cute too.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

A simple wiki article would suffice in such a situation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia. No where, absolutely no where, does it mention ASI being Australoid in nature.

what do you want to call ASI then 'caucasian'?.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

That hurt, my grandfather had ginger hair. South Indians are pretty cute too.

Pics?

what do you want to call ASI then 'caucasian'?.

If it’s actually australoid, then I will rope. That shit is disgusting. I don’t want it inside me

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Well they are the ugliest out of whites like low caste South Indians are the ugliest out of south Asians

High caste Indians (Brahmins) still IQ mog all ethnics except northeast Asians

who said I am using only south indians?street shitting is across all india.

 

[DOggo]

what do you want to call ASI then 'caucasian'?.

The ASI component is more stronger among South Indians. They aren't 'Caucasian'. I don't understand you obsession with 'Caucasian' DNA, but ANI would be considered so.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

who said I am using only south indians?street shitting is across all india.
View attachment 149737

The people in the pic are nearly black

 

[DOggo]

Pics?

If it’s actually australoid, then I will rope. That shit is disgusting. I don’t want it inside me

I'm not sending pics to some neckbeards, lmao.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

A simple wiki article would suffice in such a situation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia. No where, absolutely no where, does it mention ASI being Australoid in nature.

Similar to how arabs and europeans are both classified as caucasian then its not wrong to classify ASI as australoid because they look very similar to australian aboriginals.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

The ASI component is more stronger than among South Indians. They aren't 'Caucasian'. I don't understand you obsession with 'Caucasian' DNA, but ANI would be considered so.

Alright so what is ASI comprised of ?

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Alright so what is ASI comprised of ?

its obviously australoid just take a look at this tribal indian,if they are not caucasian what are they?

The ASI component is more stronger among South Indians. They aren't 'Caucasian'. I don't understand you obsession with 'Caucasian' DNA, but ANI would be considered so.

ANI is iran neolithic+steppe and ASI is south asian hunter gatherer which is australoid.

 

[DOggo]

Similar to how arabs and europeans are both classified as caucasian then its not wrong to classify ASI as australoid because they look very similar to australian aboriginals.

Nope, both Arabs and Europeans are Caucasians. ASI isn't Caucasian -- the most supported hypothesis puts them as Iranian ( this is pre proto-Indo-Aryan migration) pastoralists that migrated to the Indus (modern-day Pakistan).

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Nope, both Arabs and Europeans are Caucasians.

when did I say they are not?

 

[DOggo]

when did I say they are not?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia#Overview Since you have trouble reading links:

"While the ANI is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians and Europeans, the ASI is not closely related to groups outside of the subcontinent. As no "ASI" ancient DNA is available, the Onge, a possibly distantly related population native to the Andaman Islands is used as an (imperfect) proxy. But they concluded that the Onge may in fact be very different from the ASI and suggest a possible gene flow from India to the Andamanese populations.[6]

Such a pattern would be expected if there was ancient gene flow into the Andaman Islanders from a group more closely related to the ASI ancestry of some present-day Indian groups than others."

 

[Deleted member 1942]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia#Overview Since you have trouble reading links:

"While the ANI is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians and Europeans, the ASI is not closely related to groups outside of the subcontinent. As no "ASI" ancient DNA is available, the Onge, a possibly distantly related population native to the Andaman Islands is used as an (imperfect) proxy. But they concluded that the Onge may in fact be very different from the ASI and suggest a possible gene flow from India to the Andamanese populations.[6]

what's your point?.ASI is still not caucasian and the people who are closest to ASI are onge which are considered negrito.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

its obviously australoid just take a look at this tribal indian,if they are not caucasian what are they?
View attachment 149742

ANI is iran neolithic+steppe and ASI is south asian hunter gatherer which is australoid.

Well how much of it do we have? I have no australoid features. And how do you know they were the ASI people ?

 

[DOggo]

what's your point?.ASI is still not caucasian and the people who are closest to ASI are onge which are considered negrito.
View attachment 149762

OK, so I take it you didn't listen to my quote? I guess wild speculation in the midst of evidence is better.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

OK, so I take it you didn't listen to my quote? I guess wild speculation in the midst of evidence is better.

its not wild speculation just take a look at tribal indians they look 'australoid' or whatever non caucasian name you want to give them.

Well how much of it do we have? I have no australoid features. . And how do you know they were the ASI people ?

by looking at them and they were genetically closest to australoid people. how much depends on which south asian tribe are you from.

 

[DOggo]

Well how much of it do we have? I have no australoid features. And how do you know they were the ASI people ?

He's talking shit. ASI isn't Australoid.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

He's talking shit. ASI isn't Australoid.

then what it is?.why are you so ashamed of your ancestry

 

[DOggo]

then what it is?.why are you so ashamed of your ancestry

Proof has been presented which reduces your horse-shit theory to what it is; shit. Now keep barking.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Proof has been presented which reduces your horse-shit theory to what it is; shit. Now keep barking.

what proof?.you just showed that they were genetically closest to onge people which look 'negrito' 'australoid'.I guess its hard for you to accept your actual ancestry.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

its not wild speculation just take a look at tribal indians they look 'australoid' or whatever non caucasian name you want to give them.
View attachment 149763

by looking at them and they were genetically closest to australoid people. how much depends on which south asian tribe are you from.

They are dark af but they don’t have features like Australian aboriginals

How much do punjabis have ?

 

[DOggo]

what proof?.you just showed that they were genetically closest to onge people which look 'negrito' 'australoid'.I guess its hard for you to accept your actual ancestry.

Made no such claim, moron. It clearly suggests that some gene flow came from India to the Andaman Islanders.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

They are dark af but they don’t have features like Australian aboriginals

they looks closest to them but not exactly the same as abos.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

they looks closest to them but not exactly the same as abos.

How much would North Indians have ? Can’t be that much.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

How much do punjabis have ?

around 30-35.some groups around 25.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

around 30-35.some groups around 25.

ASI component isn’t fully australoid from what I remember.

 

[DOggo]

ASI component isn’t fully australoid from what I remember.

It isn't Australoid at all, curry.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

ASI component isn’t fully australoid from what I remember.

No,it is.

It isn't Australoid at all, curry.

then what it is? .I like how you people are in denial about your ancestry.

 

[DOggo]

No,it is.

then what it is? .I like how you people are in denial about your ancestry.

Narasimhan et al. (2018) conclude that ANI and ASI were formed in the 2nd millennium BCE.[69] They were preceded by a mixture of AASI (ancient ancestral south Indians, that is, hunter-gatherers), and Iranian agriculturalists who arrived in India at ca. 4700–3000 BCE, and "must have reached the Indus Valley by the 4th millennium BCE".[69] According to Narasimhan et al., this population, which probably was native to the Indus Valley Civilisation, "contributed in large proportions to both the ANI and ASI", which took shape during the 2nd millennium BCE. ANI formed out of a mixture of "Indus_Periphery-related groups" and migrants from the steppe, while ASI was formed out of "Indus_Periphery-related groups" who moved south and mixed with hunter-gatherers.[69]

 

[Deleted member 1546]

No,it is.

Then why don’t they have any australoid features showing up ?

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Narasimhan et al. (2018) conclude that ANI and ASI were formed in the 2nd millennium BCE.[69] They were preceded by a mixture of AASI (ancient ancestral south Indians, that is, hunter-gatherers), and Iranian agriculturalists who arrived in India at ca. 4700–3000 BCE, and "must have reached the Indus Valley by the 4th millennium BCE".[69] According to Narasimhan et al., this population, which probably was native to the Indus Valley Civilisation, "contributed in large proportions to both the ANI and ASI", which took shape during the 2nd millennium BCE. ANI formed out of a mixture of "Indus_Periphery-related groups" and migrants from the steppe, while ASI was formed out of "Indus_Periphery-related groups" who moved south and mixed with hunter-gatherers.[69]

and? how does it disprove what I am saying AASI were hunter gatherers australoid who mixed with iran neolithic people after it people from steppe came.

 

[DOggo]

and? how does it disprove what I am saying AASI were hunter gatherers australoid who mixed with iran neolithic people after it people from steppe came.

because your statements are without evidence, dipshit? These weren't Australoids.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Then why don’t they have any australoid features showing up ?

because you are still majority caucasian also you must still have some features in some rare cases there aren't . go take a look at mixed australian aboriginals and half whites..

because your statements are without evidence, dipshit?

what evidence do you want?.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

because you are still majority caucasian . go take a look at mixed australian aboriginals and half whites..

Yeah google Samantha harris. Her features are different from North Indians

 

[DOggo]

because you are still majority caucasian . go take a look at mixed australian aboriginals and half whites..

what evidence do you want?.

Evidence rather than " muhh black people -- so Australoids, lolz"

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Yeah google Samantha harris. Her features are different from North Indians

and? she has different admixture.indians also have iran neolithic blood.

Evidence rather than " muhh black people -- so Australoids, lolz"

Who Are The Australoid Race?

The Australoid Race refers to the a racial group spread across large parts of Asia and Oceania.

www.worldatlas.com

 

[Deleted member 1546]

and? she has different admixture.indians also have iran neolithic blood.

Yeah she has European DNA

 

[DOggo]

and? she has different admixture.indians also have iran neolithic blood.

Who Are The Australoid Race?

The Australoid Race refers to the a racial group spread across large parts of Asia and Oceania.

www.worldatlas.com

Does. Not. Mean. Shit. Fuckface. Present a study on it, or a quote from geneticist, anthropologist or whatever. Your 'source' gives nothing to substantiate its claims, not even a fucking theory.

 

[Deleted member 1942]

Does. Not. Mean. Shit. Fuckface. Present a study on it, or a quote from geneticist, anthropologist or whatever. Your 'source' gives nothing to substantiate its claims, not even a fucking theory.

that site is not fake to take revenge on you .I am not gonna bother looking for a quote from geneticist.its your ancestry go find more about it yourself.

 

[Deleted member 1546]

that site is not fake to take revenge on you .I am not gonna bother looking for a quote from geneticist.its your ancestry go find more about it yourself.

If you aren’t south asian yourself, why do you care so much