Indians rape goats gtfih proof

[Panzram]

Lmao at the Indian subhumas

 

[160cmcurry]

high t

 

[Deleted member 118189]

Yes I can confirm I did yesterday

 

[Panzram]

@Numb The Pain

 

[brownmutt42]

 

[Sonneillon]

Lmao at the Indian subhumas

Bruh i read it as indians raping goatis

 

[Nikaa]

Lmao, people in some areas even fuck donkeys without hiding it

 

[Deleted member 55437]

This isn’t true

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

@Numb The Pain

But saar!! This can’t be true saar! Only paxtani muzzies fuck goats saar. We hindoos only eat cow shit.

 

[Deleted member 55437]

But saar!! This can’t be true saar! Only paxtani muzzies fuck goats saar. We hindoos only eat cow shit.

The partition was a huge mistake
Peace is possible

 

[Panzram]

But saar!! This can’t be true saar! Only paxtani muzzies fuck goats saar. We hindoos only eat cow shit.

 

[zygomancer]

I set my location on instagram to india so all I get on my reels fyp is indians doing shit jfl

 

[Altruist]

https://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak...-su-snimali-uhvaceni-su-slucajno/2637441.aspx

 

[gymceltard]

Who care. India has most CEO. India #1

 

[gymceltard]

 

[looksmaxxed]

an indian will fuck a crack on the ground or a piece of advertisement

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

The partition was a huge mistake
Peace is possible

You troll.

On a serious note, I’m glad it happened. South Asia always had independent kingdoms throughout its history. South Asians are also very diverse genetically.

You don’t need to be one nation to have regional stability, look at Western Europe and North America for example.

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

 

[Deleted member 55437]

You troll.

On a serious note, I’m glad it happened. South Asia always had independent kingdoms throughout its history. South Asians are also very diverse genetically.

You don’t need to be one nation to have regional stability, look at Western Europe and North America for example.

You could argue the British Raj kinda created the modern south Asian identity


you’re right about stability but you’re ignoring the fact Western Europe and America have very close supranational ties. The EU is basically a singular government and NAFTA - North American free trade agreement which basically is a united nation in all but name. Whereas South Asia doesn’t have this. Maybe the BRICS to a degree since Pakistan is involved heavily with it but it’s not exclusively south Asian.

Bangladesh is essentially a puppet state of India but that’s due more to size and cultural similarity-Bengalis. It’s very hard to ignore a much larger neighbour

 

[Basedman420]

me in 2 years

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

You could argue the British Raj kinda created the modern south Asian identity


you’re right about stability but you’re ignoring the fact Western Europe and America have very close supranational ties. The EU is basically a singular government and NAFTA - North American free trade agreement which basically is a united nation in all but name. Whereas South Asia doesn’t have this. Maybe the BRICS to a degree since Pakistan is involved heavily with it but it’s not exclusively south Asian.

Bangladesh is essentially a puppet state of India but that’s due more to size and cultural similarity-Bengalis. It’s very hard to ignore a much larger neighbour

You can think of the British Raj as a forced meme, basically.

 

[Deleted member 55437]

You can think of the British Raj as a forced meme, basically.

A very violent one

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

A very violent one

We give the British too much shit but in all honesty, out of all imperial forces, they were the most humane. They did not humiliate the locals, they did not rape the locals, they did not slaughter people for failing to meet quotas. Only when people rebelled against their rule would they resort to murdering, in most cases. Although exceptions exist. I recall Islamic men would get killed for refusing to participate in WW 1 against the Ottomans, for example.

 

[Deleted member 55437]

We give the British too much shit but in all honesty, out of all imperial forces, they were the most humane. They did not humiliate the locals, they did not rape the locals, they did not slaughter people for failing to meet quotas. Only when people rebelled against their rule would they resort to murdering, in most cases. Although exceptions exist. I recall Islamic men would get killed for refusing to participate in WW 1 against the Ottomans, for example.

So it was a benevolent rule mainly ?

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

So it was a benevolent rule mainly ?

Absolutely. I’m glad it was the British and not anyone else.