Inhibition is the endgame.

monecel

monecel

Beauty and violence
Joined
Dec 14, 2023
Posts
1,900
Reputation
1,841
Too much inhib means the masculine drives are subdued. It's been to long we've lived in a world of fake egalitarianism, of whores thinking they have any value and deserve human rights, it's time to mog. Take the initiative and stop abiding by what the average person thinks. The "average opinion" is inherently mediocre. We live in a time where it requires less to become exceptional as most people destroy themselves. Most people live in a state of constant dissonance between reality and their beliefs. They encourage hypergamy and stress importance on looks and all types of physical measures through their actions but then deny it when they focus on it in their conscious mind (this is a conscious-subconscious dissonance). People that live in this state crumble once you start asking them real questions. You ask them if being fat is good and they give non-answers or say anyone can do what they want. But then you call them fat and they get offended and emotionally insulted. There are so many occasions where this is the case and it is the modern form of seperation between the conscious mind and the subconscious.

Most people think everything they have done in their life has been of their own initiative - "I want to do this, and I did it / will do it" - but your reasons for doing things are much more deterministic. They are based in genetics, upbringing, diet, location, random events that can't be controlled etc. We have to build a system of "reason" to make life feel more in our control because if we didn't do that then there would be less internal stability. How do you cope with life if you realise that you current situation isn't something that you controlled? And on top of that most people have such little personal autonomy (whatever you define that as) and outsource all of their thinking to the 'hive-mind' to the extent where their entire life and beliefs are dictated by the highest bidder rather than any intellectual/individual processing.

The modern bluepiller is fragile because their beliefs and actions contradict themselves. If they really dived into the aspects of their cognition that build their perception of the world they would figure out that a huge amount of what they based their life upon is complete bullshit. One major part where this applies is fake egalitarianism. Basically the idea that everyone is the same and all people can achieve the same things and should be able to do the same things in a society. "If everyone is equal everyone will be happy". But in reality everyone is not equal. When a woman chooses to swipe left or right over a man on dating apps does she care about "equality"? If you ask such a question she will cope with saying things that imply personality from looks, and while physiognomy is real in a lot of cases, the reality is that women abide by their subconscious impulses (as do men but to a less overpowering degree) and will create intellectual justifications of their actions after the impulse (emotion -> create intellectual/"logical" justification later).

In reality INEQUALITY will always exist and it is not GOOD or BAD but a FACT OF LIFE. It is something that exists by natural processes. Understanding it does not mean that you necessarily have to hate everything below you, but it is the acknowledgement of an inherent order in natural systems. Humans will always be more capable and less capable at certain things and because of this equality always has to be forced.

The perspective of the looksmaxxer is faustian in the way that it is understanding this inequality and then doing everything they are capable of to improve all of their traits to be higher in this order ("Will to power"). This is why people on left political leanings are not only mentally diseased but also look like dogshit is because it's not only a physical expression of their internal dissonance, but also it is an expression of their ignorance towards equality. To value beauty you must also somewhat understand inequality, as beauty is unequal. This is why they in a way destroy themselves, as if they did not then it would not be congruent with their worldview. All things are beautiful = nothing is beautiful. If an attribute applies to everything then it is a meaningless attribute.

For this reason "looksmaxxing" and the blackpill in general are an aid against the poison of hypergamy and the lies of feminism and the consequences. Not only were people deluded en masse that some form of "equality" is possible and can be enforced, but also deluded to think that it would be a good thing. I personally thing looksmaxxing might be part of the new Gen Z cultural force that will turn the tables against hypergamy (though it will be chaotic). There is discussion about whether looksmaxxing is dysgenic, and in some ways it could be as it is a form of fixing appearances rather than underlying issues (and in reality it is good to conserve and let the best genes prosper) however in times of hypergamy, if men not only became more attractive but also personally understood (through observation and personal experience) the retardation of modern women and self-described proponents of equality then it will cause a cultural shift, and an aesthetic one.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rainman988, SennenHund, miloeatscookies and 6 others
There. Its the jewz
 
  • +1
Reactions: SennenHund, carpe diem, Coping Truecel and 1 other person
Will read later.
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic.goblin, carpe diem, Coping Truecel and 1 other person
being low inhib didnt do me any good
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rainman988, VohnnyBoy, carpe diem and 1 other person
No inhibition for your face
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Rainman988, Coping Truecel and monecel
  • +1
Reactions: SennenHund, carpe diem and Coping Truecel
Too much inhib means the masculine drives are subdued. It's been to long we've lived in a world of fake egalitarianism, of whores thinking they have any value and deserve human rights, it's time to mog. Take the initiative and stop abiding by what the average person thinks. The "average opinion" is inherently mediocre. We live in a time where it requires less to become exceptional as most people destroy themselves. Most people live in a state of constant dissonance between reality and their beliefs. They encourage hypergamy and stress importance on looks and all types of physical measures through their actions but then deny it when they focus on it in their conscious mind (this is a conscious-subconscious dissonance). People that live in this state crumble once you start asking them real questions. You ask them if being fat is good and they give non-answers or say anyone can do what they want. But then you call them fat and they get offended and emotionally insulted. There are so many occasions where this is the case and it is the modern form of seperation between the conscious mind and the subconscious.

Most people think everything they have done in their life has been of their own initiative - "I want to do this, and I did it / will do it" - but your reasons for doing things are much more deterministic. They are based in genetics, upbringing, diet, location, random events that can't be controlled etc. We have to build a system of "reason" to make life feel more in our control because if we didn't do that then there would be less internal stability. How do you cope with life if you realise that you current situation isn't something that you controlled? And on top of that most people have such little personal autonomy (whatever you define that as) and outsource all of their thinking to the 'hive-mind' to the extent where their entire life and beliefs are dictated by the highest bidder rather than any intellectual/individual processing.

The modern bluepiller is fragile because their beliefs and actions contradict themselves. If they really dived into the aspects of their cognition that build their perception of the world they would figure out that a huge amount of what they based their life upon is complete bullshit. One major part where this applies is fake egalitarianism. Basically the idea that everyone is the same and all people can achieve the same things and should be able to do the same things in a society. "If everyone is equal everyone will be happy". But in reality everyone is not equal. When a woman chooses to swipe left or right over a man on dating apps does she care about "equality"? If you ask such a question she will cope with saying things that imply personality from looks, and while physiognomy is real in a lot of cases, the reality is that women abide by their subconscious impulses (as do men but to a less overpowering degree) and will create intellectual justifications of their actions after the impulse (emotion -> create intellectual/"logical" justification later).

In reality INEQUALITY will always exist and it is not GOOD or BAD but a FACT OF LIFE. It is something that exists by natural processes. Understanding it does not mean that you necessarily have to hate everything below you, but it is the acknowledgement of an inherent order in natural systems. Humans will always be more capable and less capable at certain things and because of this equality always has to be forced.

The perspective of the looksmaxxer is faustian in the way that it is understanding this inequality and then doing everything they are capable of to improve all of their traits to be higher in this order ("Will to power"). This is why people on left political leanings are not only mentally diseased but also look like dogshit is because it's not only a physical expression of their internal dissonance, but also it is an expression of their ignorance towards equality. To value beauty you must also somewhat understand inequality, as beauty is unequal. This is why they in a way destroy themselves, as if they did not then it would not be congruent with their worldview. All things are beautiful = nothing is beautiful. If an attribute applies to everything then it is a meaningless attribute.

For this reason "looksmaxxing" and the blackpill in general are an aid against the poison of hypergamy and the lies of feminism and the consequences. Not only were people deluded en masse that some form of "equality" is possible and can be enforced, but also deluded to think that it would be a good thing. I personally thing looksmaxxing might be part of the new Gen Z cultural force that will turn the tables against hypergamy (though it will be chaotic). There is discussion about whether looksmaxxing is dysgenic, and in some ways it could be as it is a form of fixing appearances rather than underlying issues (and in reality it is good to conserve and let the best genes prosper) however in times of hypergamy, if men not only became more attractive but also personally understood (through observation and personal experience) the retardation of modern women and self-described proponents of equality then it will cause a cultural shift, and an aesthetic one.
high iq post
if everyone is super, no one will be
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rainman988, carpe diem, Coping Truecel and 1 other person
high iq post
if everyone is super, no one will be
I think in the case of facial aesthetics though, there is some level of "objectivity" to it. It's why we perceive levels of attractiveness in animals as well. For looks there will always be relativism but if all men became more attractive overnight it still would cause a large change due to inherent perception changes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: carpe diem and Coping Truecel
Too much inhib means the masculine drives are subdued. It's been to long we've lived in a world of fake egalitarianism, of whores thinking they have any value and deserve human rights, it's time to mog. Take the initiative and stop abiding by what the average person thinks. The "average opinion" is inherently mediocre. We live in a time where it requires less to become exceptional as most people destroy themselves. Most people live in a state of constant dissonance between reality and their beliefs. They encourage hypergamy and stress importance on looks and all types of physical measures through their actions but then deny it when they focus on it in their conscious mind (this is a conscious-subconscious dissonance). People that live in this state crumble once you start asking them real questions. You ask them if being fat is good and they give non-answers or say anyone can do what they want. But then you call them fat and they get offended and emotionally insulted. There are so many occasions where this is the case and it is the modern form of seperation between the conscious mind and the subconscious.

Most people think everything they have done in their life has been of their own initiative - "I want to do this, and I did it / will do it" - but your reasons for doing things are much more deterministic. They are based in genetics, upbringing, diet, location, random events that can't be controlled etc. We have to build a system of "reason" to make life feel more in our control because if we didn't do that then there would be less internal stability. How do you cope with life if you realise that you current situation isn't something that you controlled? And on top of that most people have such little personal autonomy (whatever you define that as) and outsource all of their thinking to the 'hive-mind' to the extent where their entire life and beliefs are dictated by the highest bidder rather than any intellectual/individual processing.

The modern bluepiller is fragile because their beliefs and actions contradict themselves. If they really dived into the aspects of their cognition that build their perception of the world they would figure out that a huge amount of what they based their life upon is complete bullshit. One major part where this applies is fake egalitarianism. Basically the idea that everyone is the same and all people can achieve the same things and should be able to do the same things in a society. "If everyone is equal everyone will be happy". But in reality everyone is not equal. When a woman chooses to swipe left or right over a man on dating apps does she care about "equality"? If you ask such a question she will cope with saying things that imply personality from looks, and while physiognomy is real in a lot of cases, the reality is that women abide by their subconscious impulses (as do men but to a less overpowering degree) and will create intellectual justifications of their actions after the impulse (emotion -> create intellectual/"logical" justification later).

In reality INEQUALITY will always exist and it is not GOOD or BAD but a FACT OF LIFE. It is something that exists by natural processes. Understanding it does not mean that you necessarily have to hate everything below you, but it is the acknowledgement of an inherent order in natural systems. Humans will always be more capable and less capable at certain things and because of this equality always has to be forced.

The perspective of the looksmaxxer is faustian in the way that it is understanding this inequality and then doing everything they are capable of to improve all of their traits to be higher in this order ("Will to power"). This is why people on left political leanings are not only mentally diseased but also look like dogshit is because it's not only a physical expression of their internal dissonance, but also it is an expression of their ignorance towards equality. To value beauty you must also somewhat understand inequality, as beauty is unequal. This is why they in a way destroy themselves, as if they did not then it would not be congruent with their worldview. All things are beautiful = nothing is beautiful. If an attribute applies to everything then it is a meaningless attribute.

For this reason "looksmaxxing" and the blackpill in general are an aid against the poison of hypergamy and the lies of feminism and the consequences. Not only were people deluded en masse that some form of "equality" is possible and can be enforced, but also deluded to think that it would be a good thing. I personally thing looksmaxxing might be part of the new Gen Z cultural force that will turn the tables against hypergamy (though it will be chaotic). There is discussion about whether looksmaxxing is dysgenic, and in some ways it could be as it is a form of fixing appearances rather than underlying issues (and in reality it is good to conserve and let the best genes prosper) however in times of hypergamy, if men not only became more attractive but also personally understood (through observation and personal experience) the retardation of modern women and self-described proponents of equality then it will cause a cultural shift, and an aesthetic one.
Dnr but I'll rep for effort
 
I think in the case of facial aesthetics though, there is some level of "objectivity" to it. It's why we perceive levels of attractiveness in animals as well. For looks there will always be relativism but if all men became more attractive overnight it still would cause a large change due to inherent perception changes.
true but the standards would just raise over time and we would be at point 0 all over again
 
  • +1
Reactions: carpe diem
true but the standards would just raise over time and we would be at point 0 all over again
I don't think so. Anyhow I think a shorter term shift opposing hypergamy will be good
 
  • +1
Reactions: carpe diem
the next thread might be hiding some dopamine
brb dn rd
 
I don't think so. Anyhow I think a shorter term shift opposing hypergamy will be good
hopefully we js go back to conservative nuclear families and we leave hypergamy behind as a whole
 
  • +1
Reactions: monecel and carpe diem
Amazing thread. I can tell OP is a very smart guy. I've come up with the same conclusions over the years, though I didn't understand what you mean by "turning the tables against hypergamy". I think limiting women's access to dating apps, encouraging monogamy and looksmatched couples, disempowering feminism through the laws and the government, and teaching people about the importance of looks is the best way to fight the dangerous side of lookism in this society.

And this has to be addressed because people are starting to notice it.

the next thread might be hiding some dopamine
brb dn rd
Dnr but I'll rep for effort
Your loss.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: monecel, Prøphet and oxyyy
Botb worthy
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: monecel and carpe diem
hopefully we js go back to conservative nuclear families and we leave hypergamy behind as a whole
Will take extreme measures ngl
 
hopefully we js go back to conservative nuclear families and we leave hypergamy behind as a whole
Will take extreme measures
 
  • +1
Reactions: jester
Too much inhib means the masculine drives are subdued. It's been to long we've lived in a world of fake egalitarianism, of whores thinking they have any value and deserve human rights, it's time to mog. Take the initiative and stop abiding by what the average person thinks. The "average opinion" is inherently mediocre. We live in a time where it requires less to become exceptional as most people destroy themselves. Most people live in a state of constant dissonance between reality and their beliefs. They encourage hypergamy and stress importance on looks and all types of physical measures through their actions but then deny it when they focus on it in their conscious mind (this is a conscious-subconscious dissonance). People that live in this state crumble once you start asking them real questions. You ask them if being fat is good and they give non-answers or say anyone can do what they want. But then you call them fat and they get offended and emotionally insulted. There are so many occasions where this is the case and it is the modern form of seperation between the conscious mind and the subconscious.

Most people think everything they have done in their life has been of their own initiative - "I want to do this, and I did it / will do it" - but your reasons for doing things are much more deterministic. They are based in genetics, upbringing, diet, location, random events that can't be controlled etc. We have to build a system of "reason" to make life feel more in our control because if we didn't do that then there would be less internal stability. How do you cope with life if you realise that you current situation isn't something that you controlled? And on top of that most people have such little personal autonomy (whatever you define that as) and outsource all of their thinking to the 'hive-mind' to the extent where their entire life and beliefs are dictated by the highest bidder rather than any intellectual/individual processing.

The modern bluepiller is fragile because their beliefs and actions contradict themselves. If they really dived into the aspects of their cognition that build their perception of the world they would figure out that a huge amount of what they based their life upon is complete bullshit. One major part where this applies is fake egalitarianism. Basically the idea that everyone is the same and all people can achieve the same things and should be able to do the same things in a society. "If everyone is equal everyone will be happy". But in reality everyone is not equal. When a woman chooses to swipe left or right over a man on dating apps does she care about "equality"? If you ask such a question she will cope with saying things that imply personality from looks, and while physiognomy is real in a lot of cases, the reality is that women abide by their subconscious impulses (as do men but to a less overpowering degree) and will create intellectual justifications of their actions after the impulse (emotion -> create intellectual/"logical" justification later).

In reality INEQUALITY will always exist and it is not GOOD or BAD but a FACT OF LIFE. It is something that exists by natural processes. Understanding it does not mean that you necessarily have to hate everything below you, but it is the acknowledgement of an inherent order in natural systems. Humans will always be more capable and less capable at certain things and because of this equality always has to be forced.

The perspective of the looksmaxxer is faustian in the way that it is understanding this inequality and then doing everything they are capable of to improve all of their traits to be higher in this order ("Will to power"). This is why people on left political leanings are not only mentally diseased but also look like dogshit is because it's not only a physical expression of their internal dissonance, but also it is an expression of their ignorance towards equality. To value beauty you must also somewhat understand inequality, as beauty is unequal. This is why they in a way destroy themselves, as if they did not then it would not be congruent with their worldview. All things are beautiful = nothing is beautiful. If an attribute applies to everything then it is a meaningless attribute.

For this reason "looksmaxxing" and the blackpill in general are an aid against the poison of hypergamy and the lies of feminism and the consequences. Not only were people deluded en masse that some form of "equality" is possible and can be enforced, but also deluded to think that it would be a good thing. I personally thing looksmaxxing might be part of the new Gen Z cultural force that will turn the tables against hypergamy (though it will be chaotic). There is discussion about whether looksmaxxing is dysgenic, and in some ways it could be as it is a form of fixing appearances rather than underlying issues (and in reality it is good to conserve and let the best genes prosper) however in times of hypergamy, if men not only became more attractive but also personally understood (through observation and personal experience) the retardation of modern women and self-described proponents of equality then it will cause a cultural shift, and an aesthetic one.
Dnr+water
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: monecel
dnr
 
  • +1
Reactions: monecel
Hi
 
  • Woah
Reactions: monecel
G
Too much inhib means the masculine drives are subdued. It's been to long we've lived in a world of fake egalitarianism, of whores thinking they have any value and deserve human rights, it's time to mog. Take the initiative and stop abiding by what the average person thinks. The "average opinion" is inherently mediocre. We live in a time where it requires less to become exceptional as most people destroy themselves. Most people live in a state of constant dissonance between reality and their beliefs. They encourage hypergamy and stress importance on looks and all types of physical measures through their actions but then deny it when they focus on it in their conscious mind (this is a conscious-subconscious dissonance). People that live in this state crumble once you start asking them real questions. You ask them if being fat is good and they give non-answers or say anyone can do what they want. But then you call them fat and they get offended and emotionally insulted. There are so many occasions where this is the case and it is the modern form of seperation between the conscious mind and the subconscious.

Most people think everything they have done in their life has been of their own initiative - "I want to do this, and I did it / will do it" - but your reasons for doing things are much more deterministic. They are based in genetics, upbringing, diet, location, random events that can't be controlled etc. We have to build a system of "reason" to make life feel more in our control because if we didn't do that then there would be less internal stability. How do you cope with life if you realise that you current situation isn't something that you controlled? And on top of that most people have such little personal autonomy (whatever you define that as) and outsource all of their thinking to the 'hive-mind' to the extent where their entire life and beliefs are dictated by the highest bidder rather than any intellectual/individual processing.

The modern bluepiller is fragile because their beliefs and actions contradict themselves. If they really dived into the aspects of their cognition that build their perception of the world they would figure out that a huge amount of what they based their life upon is complete bullshit. One major part where this applies is fake egalitarianism. Basically the idea that everyone is the same and all people can achieve the same things and should be able to do the same things in a society. "If everyone is equal everyone will be happy". But in reality everyone is not equal. When a woman chooses to swipe left or right over a man on dating apps does she care about "equality"? If you ask such a question she will cope with saying things that imply personality from looks, and while physiognomy is real in a lot of cases, the reality is that women abide by their subconscious impulses (as do men but to a less overpowering degree) and will create intellectual justifications of their actions after the impulse (emotion -> create intellectual/"logical" justification later).

In reality INEQUALITY will always exist and it is not GOOD or BAD but a FACT OF LIFE. It is something that exists by natural processes. Understanding it does not mean that you necessarily have to hate everything below you, but it is the acknowledgement of an inherent order in natural systems. Humans will always be more capable and less capable at certain things and because of this equality always has to be forced.

The perspective of the looksmaxxer is faustian in the way that it is understanding this inequality and then doing everything they are capable of to improve all of their traits to be higher in this order ("Will to power"). This is why people on left political leanings are not only mentally diseased but also look like dogshit is because it's not only a physical expression of their internal dissonance, but also it is an expression of their ignorance towards equality. To value beauty you must also somewhat understand inequality, as beauty is unequal. This is why they in a way destroy themselves, as if they did not then it would not be congruent with their worldview. All things are beautiful = nothing is beautiful. If an attribute applies to everything then it is a meaningless attribute.

For this reason "looksmaxxing" and the blackpill in general are an aid against the poison of hypergamy and the lies of feminism and the consequences. Not only were people deluded en masse that some form of "equality" is possible and can be enforced, but also deluded to think that it would be a good thing. I personally thing looksmaxxing might be part of the new Gen Z cultural force that will turn the tables against hypergamy (though it will be chaotic). There is discussion about whether looksmaxxing is dysgenic, and in some ways it could be as it is a form of fixing appearances rather than underlying issues (and in reality it is good to conserve and let the best genes prosper) however in times of hypergamy, if men not only became more attractive but also personally understood (through observation and personal experience) the retardation of modern women and self-described proponents of equality then it will cause a cultural shift, and an aesthetic one.
Great post. Glad this is the first post I see after a long time of not being on awhile.
 
  • +1
Reactions: monecel

Similar threads

WELOVELOOKS
Replies
9
Views
68
Algernon
Algernon
Iamsobased
Replies
2
Views
32
Iamsobased
Iamsobased
Q
Replies
5
Views
63
Zalmoxis
Zalmoxis
C
Replies
7
Views
93
clingtight
C
BruceWayneMogs
Replies
5
Views
143
ruikundumb
ruikundumb

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top