injecting ghkcu, tb500, and bpc-157 (Glow50) locally or subq in typical injection sites

[blackpilledmocha]

I'm on day 2 of Glow as of today i just injected for the second time in my abdomen but im wondering if local injections in my face may be better. My only worry is possible localized copper overload and poor diffusion. but ive heard stories of localized tb-500 curing injuries faster then subq injections. Thoughts?

 

[WhiteGoodman]

(Cope50)

 

[primalmaxer]

gay tret and bb cream mogs

 

[bignigga]

I'm on day 2 of Glow as of today i just injected for the second time in my abdomen but im wondering if local injections in my face may be better. My only worry is possible localized copper overload and poor diffusion. but ive heard stories of localized tb-500 curing injuries faster then subq injections. Thoughts?

don't inject your face dickhead

it's an injury healing stack... because of the bpc you're supposed to pin it where your injury actually is

 

[blackpilledmocha]

gay tret and bb cream mogs

im working with what i have, and funny you say gay and then mention bb cream faggot

 

[blackpilledmocha]

don't inject your face dickhead

it's an injury healing stack... because of the bpc you're supposed to pin it where your injury actually is

alr ty

 

[primalmaxer]

im working with what i have, and funny you say gay and then mention bb cream faggot

how is getting better skin to get more woman gay in any way what so ever? explain pl? making these shitty ass low iq threads hang it up bro with your cope ass peptides jfl

 

[bignigga]

alr ty

give me solution bhai

 

[bignigga]

how is getting better skin to get more woman gay in any way what so ever? explain pls

then why'd you call him gay for using glow? only to then say you use bb cream which is pretty much makeup (fag)

 

[blackpilledmocha]

how is getting better skin to get more woman gay in any way what so ever? explain pl? making these shitty ass low iq threads hang it up bro with your cope ass peptides jfl

are you dumb nigga, "im gonna call you gay for using a pep for better skin, and then say its not gay to use makeup to get better skin" use your fuckin brain retard

 

[primalmaxer]

then why'd you call him gay for using glow? only to then say you use bb cream which is pretty much makeup (fag)

because it doesnt do shit i was referring to him as gay cause i thought he was to scared to run accutane or tret like a little pussy but no hes just broke, it doesnt matter whether its makeup or not it makes you look better and thats the whole point of looksmaxing

 

[bignigga]

because it doesnt do shit i was referring to him as gay cause i thought he was to scared to run accutane or tret like a little pussy but no hes just broke, it doesnt matter whether its makeup or not it makes you look better and thats the whole point of looksmaxing

ghkcu isn't for acne you cuck tf does it have to do with accutane or tret it's a completely different thing

 

[aids]

don't inject your face dickhead

it's an injury healing stack... because of the bpc you're supposed to pin it where your injury actually is

Brainlet moron.
Stop asking for your answers to be marked as a solution if they're wrong.

Everyone uses GLOW/KLOW via subcutaneous injection for the systemic effect regardless of the BPC-157/TB-500 (TB-4 fragment) content.

 

[bignigga]

Brainlet moron.
Stop asking for your answers to be marked as a solution if they're wrong.

Everyone uses GLOW/KLOW via subcutaneous injection for the systemic effect regardless of the BPC-157/TB-500 (TB-4 fragment) content.

what?? what is your point here and how does this disprove mine?? you're supposed to inject bpc near the injury site and the other compounds are systemic either way so why would it matter? you can inject anywhere sure and you'll get most of the benefits but you won't get the main localised injury healing benefits from bpc

 

[aids]

what?? what is your point here and how does this disprove mine?? you're supposed to inject bpc near the injury site and the other are systemic either way so why would it matter? you can inject anywhere sure and you'll get most of the benefits but you won't get the main localised injury healing benefits from bpc

Because it's not BPC-157 retard, it's the GLOW blend.
Nobody uses GLOW for local injections.
BPC-157/TB-500 blends, TB-4, TB-500, or just BPC-157 standalone? Sure.

 

[blackpilledmocha]

Because it's not BPC-157 retard, it's the GLOW blend.
Nobody uses GLOW for local injections.
BPC-157/TB-500 blends, TB-4, TB-500, or just BPC-157 standalone? Sure.

i mean if all the other peps are systemic either way and u have an injury somewhere would it not just be better to inject locally to take full benefit of the tb-500? or am i missing something

 

[primalmaxer]

ghkcu isn't for acne you cuck tf does it have to do with accutane or tret it's a completely different thing

you are a absoloute brainlet what is the prupose for ghkcu other than good skin which accutane or tret paired with bb cream does extraordinarily

 

[bignigga]

Because it's not BPC-157 retard, it's the GLOW blend.
Nobody uses GLOW for local injections.
BPC-157/TB-500 blends, TB-4, TB-500, or just BPC-157 standalone? Sure.

right, bpc is in the blend

bpc = localised
tb = systemic
ghk = systemic

so say you have an injured knee, why wouldn't you pin your glow blend on your knee for the bpc to be more effective? it won't alter the effectiveness of the other compounds? i really don't understand what you're trying to argue here

 

[aids]

i mean if all the other peps are systemic either way and u have an injury somewhere would it not just be better to inject locally to take full benefit of the tb-500? or am i missing something

If you inject locally i.e., into the dermis then the effect of the peptides is local to where you've injected it.

 

[bignigga]

you are a absoloute brainlet what is the prupose for ghkcu other than good skin which accutane or tret paired with bb cream does extraordinarily

brainlet calling me brainlet go put on some more bb cream fag

 

[aids]

right, bpc is in the blend

bpc = localised
tb = systemic
ghk = systemic

so say you have an injured knee, why wouldn't you pin your glow blend on your knee for the bpc to be more effective? it won't alter the effectiveness of the other compounds? i really don't understand what you're trying to argue here

You're a dumbass JFL.
The method of delivery and how quickly the molecule itself binds to receptors in the body is what determines whether or not the effect is systemic.
If there's an abundance of the relevant receptor that the peptide ligand binds to where you inject then the peptide will not go systemic.

Further, people literally take BPC-157 capsules and you have the audacity to say that it only has effects local to the injection site

 

[aids]

brainlet calling me brainlet go put on some more bb cream fag

You are a brainlet.

 

[bignigga]

You're a dumbass JFL.
The method of delivery and how quickly the molecule itself binds to receptors in the body is what determines whether or not the effect is systemic.
If there's an abundance of the relevant receptor that the peptide ligand binds to where you inject then the peptide will not go systemic.

Further, people literally take BPC-157 capsules and you have the audacity to say that it only has effects local to the injection site

do you have any sources that actually back up your claim? and bpc157 orals are known to be complete shit if you've ever been on any bodybuilding and powerlifting forums

 

[bignigga]

You're a dumbass JFL.
The method of delivery and how quickly the molecule itself binds to receptors in the body is what determines whether or not the effect is systemic.
If there's an abundance of the relevant receptor that the peptide ligand binds to where you inject then the peptide will not go systemic.

Further, people literally take BPC-157 capsules and you have the audacity to say that it only has effects local to the injection site

also i didnt claim that the bpc only has effects local to the injection site... i said it was more effective injected near the injury site

 

[aids]

do you have any sources that actually back up your claim? and bpc157 orals are known to be complete shit if you've ever been on any bodybuilding and powerlifting forums

This is just utter larp.
People like Tony Huge use it (the capsules) everyday and stand by it for gut health.
The general consensus is that they work for what the actual use case is. You have no idea

 

[aids]

also i didnt claim that the bpc only has effects local to the injection site... i said it was more effective injected near the injury site

Stop arguing semantics with me. I don't give a fuck--you are wrong.

 

[bignigga]

This is just utter larp.
People like Tony Huge use it (the capsules) everyday and stand by it for gut health.
The general consensus is that they work for what the actual use case is. You have no idea

what the fuck are you talking about??? gut health?? no shit oral bpc works for gut health that's it's primary use. weren't we talking about injuries two seconds ago? do you know anyone that received the same results as injectable bpc when it comes to actual injuries using oral bpc? because i sure don't

 

[aids]

do you have any sources that actually back up your claim? and bpc157 orals are known to be complete shit if you've ever been on any bodybuilding and powerlifting forums

what the fuck are you talking about??? gut health?? no shit oral bpc works for gut health that's it's primary use. weren't we talking about injuries two seconds ago? do you know anyone that received the same results as injectable bpc when it comes to actual injuries using oral bpc? because i sure don't

You made no reference to use case.
The point is that:

You're a dumbass JFL.
The method of delivery and how quickly the molecule itself binds to receptors in the body is what determines whether or not the effect is systemic.
If there's an abundance of the relevant receptor that the peptide ligand binds to where you inject then the peptide will not go systemic.

Further, people literally take BPC-157 capsules and you have the audacity to say that it only has effects local to the injection site

You can argue all you want about whether or not the effect of BPC-157 is local, but the fact you can dose via oral administration implies that the effect of BPC-157 is not solely localised and my initial contention remains true.

Do you need me to map this jigsaw puzzle for you? Retard.
Again arguing semantics with me about the use case when we are talking about administration and the consequent possible localised/systemic effects.

 

[aids]

what the fuck are you talking about??? gut health?? no shit oral bpc works for gut health that's it's primary use. weren't we talking about injuries two seconds ago? do you know anyone that received the same results as injectable bpc when it comes to actual injuries using oral bpc? because i sure don't

Like, fuck me, you are such a retard, grasping at straws here and just arguing semantics with me over and over.
Shift the goal posts even further you fucking moron.
I hate speaking to absolute degenerates like you. You don't deserve to be a part of the discourse on this forum. Go fuck off.

 

[bignigga]

You made no reference to use case.
The point is that:

You can argue all you want about whether or not the effect of BPC-157 is local, but the fact you can dose via oral administration implies that the effect of BPC-157 is not solely localised and my initial contention remains true.

Do you need me to map this jigsaw puzzle for you? Retard.
Again arguing semantics with me about the use case when we are talking about administration and the consequent possible localised/systemic effects.

injuries were mentioned earlier in the post, shouldn't be hard to connect the dots retard

The method of delivery and how quickly the molecule itself binds to receptors in the body is what determines whether or not the effect is systemic.
If there's an abundance of the relevant receptor that the peptide ligand binds to where you inject then the peptide will not go systemic.

this is also false, i asked for a source earlier to back up this claim concerning bpc and you didn't give me one, just kept insulting me acting all high and mighty

actually insane

 

[aids]

injuries were mentioned earlier in the post, shouldn't be hard to connect the dots retard

I'm on day 2 of Glow as of today i just injected for the second time in my abdomen but im wondering if local injections in my face may be better. My only worry is possible localized copper overload and poor diffusion. but ive heard stories of localized tb-500 curing injuries faster then subq injections. Thoughts?

Yeah mate, clearly OP is concerned about injury recovery. Incorrect if this were even relevant anyway, JFL @ you, no more straws left to grasp at. Stop shifting the goal posts, again.
When did I say anything about specifically injury recovery? The point is you CANNOT make such a blanket statement as this:

right, bpc is in the blend

bpc = localised
tb = systemic
ghk = systemic

so say you have an injured knee, why wouldn't you pin your glow blend on your knee for the bpc to be more effective? it won't alter the effectiveness of the other compounds? i really don't understand what you're trying to argue here

The effect of BPC-157 is not local because it is purely BPC-157, it again depends on the method of administration as I've clarified.

this is also false, i asked for a source earlier to back up this claim concerning bpc and you didn't give me one, just kept insulting me acting all high and mighty

There is one piece of literature on a single person involving the administration of local injectable BPC-157.
If you are going to try and argue that I am wrong because I haven't given you clinical evidence supporting my claims, then clearly you have no idea about the peptide you're discussing given the absence of literature for it, implying that you know fucking nothing

How hard is it to discern that because oral BPC-157 will have an effect on gut health (i.e., an effect not local to where the BPC-157 was administered because it was administered orally), that you again CANNOT make such blanket statements about BPC-157 having a localised effect solely because of the fact it is BPC-157.

I'm not arguing any further with a fucking retard like you.
Now leave this forum & don't come back.

 

[bignigga]

Yeah mate, clearly OP is concerned about injury recovery. Incorrect if this were even relevant anyway, JFL @ you, no more straws left to grasp at. Stop shifting the goal posts, again.

he literally mentions injuries in that post and said "alr ty" when i told him about injecting near the injury site implying he does have an injury (connect the dots retard)

The effect of BPC-157 is not local because it is purely BPC-157, it again depends on the method of administration as I've clarified.

oh my god what did you want me to say? partially local? dickhead im so sorry

There is one piece of literature on a single person involving the administration of local injectable BPC-157.
If you are going to try and argue that I am wrong because I haven't given you clinical evidence supporting my claims, then clearly you have no idea about the peptide you're discussing given the absence of literature for it, implying that you know fucking nothing

How hard is it to discern that because oral BPC-157 will have an effect on gut health (i.e., an effect not local to where the BPC-157 was administered because it was administered orally), that you again CANNOT make such blanket statements about BPC-157 having a localised effect solely because of the fact it is BPC-157.

bpc has stronger effects when injected near the injury because local concentration is higher, not because receptors trap it there. (idk where the fuck you got that from) obviously it still spreads systemically i never claimed it didn't

I'm not arguing any further with a fucking retard like you.
Now leave this forum & don't come back.

wow not cool

 

[aids]

he literally mentions injuries in that post and said "alr ty" when i told him about injecting near the injury site implying he does have an injury (connect the dots retard)

I'm on day 2 of Glow as of today i just injected for the second time in my abdomen but im wondering if local injections in my face may be better. My only worry is possible localized copper overload and poor diffusion. but ive heard stories of localized tb-500 curing injuries faster then subq injections. Thoughts?

Great pattern recognition skills mate.
Does he have an injury in his face? Obviously not, JFL.

oh my god what did you want me to say? partially local? dickhead im so sorry

No, explain the nuance instead of giving the incorrect blanket statements that you do, fucking idiot. Imagine not being able to infer that as my point when I literally told you twice to not give blanket statements.
Do you know what a blanket statement is? Search it up you faggot.

bpc has stronger effects when injected near the injury because local concentration is higher, not because receptors trap it there. (idk where the fuck you got that from) obviously it still spreads systemically i never claimed it didn't

Pseudoscience from a pseudointellectual.
Does that mean my ass cheeks have higher testosterone than the rest of my body because that's where I inject it?

 

[bignigga]

Pseudoscience from a pseudointellectual.
Does that mean my ass cheeks have higher testosterone than the rest of my body because that's where I inject it?

thanks for confirming that you are genuinely a retard, i don't think i really have to explain this for the average person but since you're clearly quite a few sd's lower than the mean in terms of iq, i'll do it

testosterone is a systemic hormone by design... its primary effect is mediated by circulating levels, so injecting anywhere gives systemic exposure. bpc is a small peptide with local tissue effects, so while it does spread systemically, the highest concentration near the injection site gives stronger local repair effects.

local efficacy doesn’t require local trapping by receptors, it just depends on where the molecule is most concentrated initially.

you're trying too hard to sound smart man.

won't reply to any of the earlier shit because i can't be fucked with a stubborn cuck like you

 

[aids]

thanks for confirming that you are genuinely a retard, i don't think i really have to explain this for the average person but since you're clearly quite a few sd's lower than the mean in terms of iq, i'll do it

testosterone is a systemic hormone by design... its primary effect is mediated by circulating levels, so injecting anywhere gives systemic exposure. bpc is a small peptide with local tissue effects, so while it does spread systemically, the highest concentration near the injection site gives stronger local repair effects.

local efficacy doesn’t require local trapping by receptors, it just depends on where the molecule is most concentrated initially.

you're trying too hard to sound smart man.

won't reply to any of the earlier shit because i can't be fucked with a stubborn cuck like you

DNR @ your ChatGPT reliance. I don't go back and forth with faggots that just regurgitate their AI prompt responses. Further, the testosterone thing was obviously a joke, imagine being so low IQ to not be able to discern that JFLL
Don't be so blatant next time.

 

[aids]

won't reply to any of the earlier shit because i can't be fucked with a stubborn cuck like you

= "i am an idiot and cant comprehend your intellectual speakings muh lets smoke weed".

 

[bignigga]

DNR @ your ChatGPT reliance. I don't go back and forth with faggots that just regurgitate their AI prompt responses.
Don't be so blatant next time.

not ai, just started talking more like you

didn't refute anything though did you? because you can't because i'm right, even if it were ai what the fuck does it change

 

[bignigga]

= "i am an idiot and cant comprehend your intellectual speakings muh lets smoke weed".

back to insults when proven wrong come down from your pedestal fag

 

[aids]

not ai, just started talking more like you

didn't refute anything though did you? because you can't because i'm right, even if it were ai what the fuck does it change

There is nothing to refute, because it was an obvious hyperbole to be framed as a joke.
Ironic that you say I didn't refute shit when you say this:

won't reply to any of the earlier shit because i can't be fucked with a stubborn cuck like you

And don't actually address the fact you haven't considered the nuance of administration & how the effect of these peptides differs dependent on such.
You don't have a response for that because you are objectively wrong, it's not because you can't be fucked; it's because you genuinely don't have any counterargument and any bullshit you say beyond this is going to be even more AI-recited bullshit. You can lie all you want but we both know that you got that bullshit from a Google Overview and/or ChatGPT.

 

[aids]

not ai, just started talking more like you

didn't refute anything though did you? because you can't because i'm right, even if it were ai what the fuck does it change

JFL
@Orka
This is like that schneckmax retard.
"oh theyre getting their products so whats it matter"

The point is that you are relying on AI for your arguments with me and don't actually know shit, so you're reciting responses from your biased prompting and such is not objective nor actually considerate of genuine anecdotes, nor the literature (albeit little).

 

[aids]

back to insults when proven wrong come down from your pedestal fag

JFL
@Orka
This is like that schneckmax retard.
"oh theyre getting their products so whats it matter"

The point is that you are relying on AI for your arguments with me and don't actually know shit, so you're reciting responses from your biased prompting and such is not objective nor actually considerate of genuine anecdotes, nor the literature (albeit little).

To clarify my statement here for a pseudointellectual like you.
The ends do NOT justify the means in this context.

 

[bignigga]

The point is that you are relying on AI for your arguments with me and don't actually know shit, so you're reciting responses from your biased prompting and such is not objective nor actually considerate of genuine anecdotes, nor the literature (albeit little).

but you do? i mean you still haven't given me any sources for your claim so why should i believe you? why am i the one that has to refute your (false) arguments when you're the one that wanted to argue with me?

 

[aids]

but you do? i mean you still haven't given me any sources for your claim so why should i believe you? why am i the one that has to refute your (false) arguments when you're the one that wanted to argue with me?

Because there is NO FUCKING LITERATURE for BPC-157 apart from ONE STUDY IRRELEVANT TO THE CONTENTION ARGUED IN THIS DISCOURSE.

Read my fucking posts in full rather than skimming or selectively reading shit you idiot.
I am not responding further.
Go fuck yourself or better yet, get a hold of yourself and learn to accept when you are wrong.

 

[aids]

but you do? i mean you still haven't given me any sources for your claim so why should i believe you? why am i the one that has to refute your (false) arguments when you're the one that wanted to argue with me?

YOU made the claim that BPC-157 has specifically local effects, and any reasonable person can discern that is NOT true otherwise BPC-157 capsules would be redundant (but they are not), so the burden of proof that BPC-157 has specifically local effects regardless of administration is on YOU.

I fucking hate morons like you. LEAVE THE FUCKING FORUM.

 

[bignigga]

Because there is NO FUCKING LITERATURE for BPC-157 apart from ONE STUDY IRRELEVANT TO THE CONTENTION ARGUED IN THIS DISCOURSE.

Read my fucking posts in full rather than skimming or selectively reading shit you idiot.
I am not responding further.
Go fuck yourself or better yet, get a hold of yourself and learn to accept when you are wrong.

so where'd you get your earlier claim "The method of delivery and how quickly the molecule itself binds to receptors in the body is what determines whether or not the effect is systemic. If there's an abundance of the relevant receptor that the peptide ligand binds to where you inject then the peptide will not go systemic."

which i refuted anyway and when you were proven wrong you insantly cried "chatgpt buh im wrong but i cant accept that"

anyway cya

 

[aids]

so where'd you get your earlier claim "The method of delivery and how quickly the molecule itself binds to receptors in the body is what determines whether or not the effect is systemic. If there's an abundance of the relevant receptor that the peptide ligand binds to where you inject then the peptide will not go systemic."

Maybe, the fact, that ORAL BPC-157 exists, as AFOREMENTIONED LITERALLY ~5 TIMES. Holy fucking shitttttt you retard.

which i refuted anyway and when you were proven wrong you insantly cried "chatgpt buh im wrong but i cant accept that"

anyway cya

No, you did not prove me wrong. You just took my testosterone joke seriously and DNR'd the rest of my posts.
You are a pseudointellectual and I hope you are removed from the gene pool so as not to perpetuate such retarded discussion in the future. I don't want my children anywhere near yours.

 

[blackpilledmocha]

Maybe, the fact, that ORAL BPC-157 exists, as AFOREMENTIONED LITERALLY ~5 TIMES. Holy fucking shitttttt you retard.


No, you did not prove me wrong. You just took my testosterone joke seriously and DNR'd the rest of my posts.
You are a pseudointellectual and I hope you are removed from the gene pool so as not to perpetuate such retarded discussion in the future. I don't want my children anywhere near yours.

im cryin bro