IPD, PFL and Bigonial Width

[randomvanish]

What should be the ratios among these for a solid attractive face ?

 

[Deleted member 8583]

What should be the ratios among these for a solid attractive face ?

ratio of 10 dopamine to 1 cortisol when looking in the mirror should mean ur ratios are fine

 

[Deleted member 8165]

ipd 0.46, pfl 30+ is good , bigonial to zygomatic should be 0.9 to 1

 

[MisterMercedes]

PFL and IPD should be such that facial fifths are close to or perfectly balanced and that your horizontal proportions meet the golden ratio.

Nathalie Delon and this morphed Gandy photo (minimal morphing was required) have perfect/close to perfect horizontal proportions:

Most attractive bigonial width typically falls in the 80-90% of the face width range. This plays a role in creating the “tapering” or oval face shape that has been found to be ideal in males.

 

[randomvanish]

PFL and IPD should be such that facial fifths are close to or perfectly balanced and that your horizontal proportions meet the golden ratio.

Nathalie Delon and this morphed Gandy photo (minimal morphing was required) have perfect/close to perfect horizontal proportions:

View attachment 853072View attachment 853073

Most attractive bigonial width typically falls in the 80-90% of the face width range. This plays a role in creating the “tapering” or oval face shape that has been found to be ideal in males.


View attachment 853092View attachment 853093View attachment 853094

so i'm considering getting custom jaw&malar implant in this summer. what are the limits must be for a face when it comes to ipd/pfl to bionial width?

 

[MisterMercedes]

so i'm considering getting custom jaw&malar implant in this summer. what are the limits must be for a face when it comes to ipd/pfl to bionial width?

Not sure exactly what you’re asking, but a line drawn straight down from the lateral canthus should fall slightly inside the gonion.

Good:

Bad:

 

[Deleted member 6128]

PFL and IPD should be such that facial fifths are close to or perfectly balanced and that your horizontal proportions meet the golden ratio.

Nathalie Delon and this morphed Gandy photo (minimal morphing was required) have perfect/close to perfect horizontal proportions:

View attachment 853072View attachment 853073

Most attractive bigonial width typically falls in the 80-90% of the face width range. This plays a role in creating the “tapering” or oval face shape that has been found to be ideal in males.


View attachment 853092View attachment 853093View attachment 853094

Diamond not oval

 

[MisterMercedes]

Diamond not oval

Both can be attractive (most face shapes can be attractive) but oval has been found to be most conventionally attractive on guys.

There is some overlap between oval and diamond as well. Eriksen, for example, has characteristics of both:

So does Christian Bale:

 

[Deleted member 11221]

i could only dream