IQ is bull shit???

[Cleetus Cornfield]

Think about it, IQ was created by academically successful white men. Surely they would make a test they know they could excel in compared to other groups.

It was then and still is used to study the intelligence of other races and social classes. All of this done to try and make the argument that the people “below them” don’t deserve funding for education, further widening the gap between the poor and the rich.

And then people like @Jason Voorhees constantly make race bait posts sharing studies where black Africans are academically below the average educated middle class European.

Ofc they are gonna be less it intelligent their shitty corrupt leaders fuck their country up so much they can’t afford any education

 

[Jason Voorhees]

The moderm IQ tests such as the WAIS and Stanford-Binet, are frequently updated with input from diverse groups of psychologists and statisticians to reduce cultural, racial, and socioeconomic biases. It is definitely not muh whyte cope. IQ tests were originally developed to identify children who needed extra help in school-not to rank people or determine racial or social superiority.


Also I never said IQ is the end it be all. It just measures specific cognitive skills like problem solving, pattern recognition, and verbal reasoning. These tests are not meant to measure a person's worth, value, or potential in life. In Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences, IQ only measure logical, visual and verbal intelligence.

@wishIwasSalludon @loyolaxavvierretard @Debetro

 

[Hurricane1]

 

[Jason Voorhees]

The moderm IQ tests such as the WAIS and Stanford-Binet, are frequently updated with input from diverse groups of psychologists and statisticians to reduce cultural, racial, and socioeconomic biases. It is definitely not muh whyte cope. IQ tests were originally developed to identify children who needed extra help in school-not to rank people or determine racial or social superiority.


Also I never said IQ is the end it be all. It just measures specific cognitive skills like problem solving, pattern recognition, and verbal reasoning. These tests are not meant to measure a person's worth, value, or potential in life. In Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences, IQ only measure logical, visual and verbal intelligence.

@wishIwasSalludon @loyolaxavvierretard @Debetro


View attachment 3705425

@HimmyButlerV2

 

[Saint Casanova]

The moderm IQ tests such as the WAIS and Stanford-Binet, are frequently updated with input from diverse groups of psychologists and statisticians to reduce cultural, racial, and socioeconomic biases. It is definitely not muh whyte cope. IQ tests were originally developed to identify children who needed extra help in school-not to rank people or determine racial or social superiority.


Also I never said IQ is the end it be all. It just measures specific cognitive skills like problem solving, pattern recognition, and verbal reasoning. These tests are not meant to measure a person's worth, value, or potential in life. In Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences, IQ only measure logical, visual and verbal intelligence.

@wishIwasSalludon @loyolaxavvierretard @Debetro


View attachment 3705425

Logical-mathematical is by far the most important one for successful barring outliers in musical or spatial

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

The moderm IQ tests such as the WAIS and Stanford-Binet, are frequently updated with input from diverse groups of psychologists and statisticians to reduce cultural, racial, and socioeconomic biases. It is definitely not muh whyte cope. IQ tests were originally developed to identify children who needed extra help in school-not to rank people or determine racial or social superiority.


Also I never said IQ is the end it be all. It just measures specific cognitive skills like problem solving, pattern recognition, and verbal reasoning. These tests are not meant to measure a person's worth, value, or potential in life. In Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences IQ only measure logical, visual and verbal intelligence the slice colored in purple

@wishIwasSalludon @loyolaxavvierretard @Debetro


View attachment 3705425

There are moderate correlations for earnings and IQ until the 90th percentile. After that connections and family socio economic status matters more. But the fact remains that a mediocore guy of any race is never going to be working in a physics department. To excel in academia you need above average IQ especially in hard sciences. To win Nobel Prize you have to be genius. The same can be said for working at top end of the finance industry.

 

[Saint Casanova]

There are moderate correlations for earnings and IQ until the 90th percentile. After that connections and family socio economic status matters more. But the fact remains that a mediocore guy of any race is never going to be working in a physics department. To excel in academia you need above average IQ especially in hard sciences. To win Nobel Prize you have to be genius. The same can be said for working at top end of the finance industry.

Depends on which area of the finance industry. You can genuinely get away with having average intelligence in a lot of finance fields in terms of your day to day tasks, and that’s the case with most white collar jobs tbh

Obviously trading, quant and other heavily analytical fields require good logical aptitude

It’s just that intelligence is skewed in finance since they select from the best schools

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Depends on which area of the finance industry. You can genuinely get away with having average intelligence in a lot of finance fields in terms of your day to day tasks, and that’s the case with most white collar jobs tbh

Obviously trading, quant and other heavily analytical fields require good logical aptitude

It’s just that intelligence is skewed in finance since they select from the best schools

Actuarial positions depend heavily on quantitative solving, and they pay well in a lot of countries. Even apart from finance if you want to make an impact in academia you need to be atleast 98-99%tile at the minimum. That would correlate to 130 IQ.

 

[RecessedCel5]

There are moderate correlations for earnings and IQ until the 90th percentile. After that connections and family socio economic status matters more. But the fact remains that a mediocore guy of any race is never going to be working in a physics department. To excel in academia you need above average IQ especially in hard sciences. To win Nobel Prize you have to be genius. The same can be said for working at top end of the finance industry.

iirc billionaires don't have the highest IQ. which you would expect if there was a strong causality between IQ and income

 

[looksmaxxed]

iq's failure, is the same as sat, or school performance, in that it's not correctly identifying libtard tendencies as a sign of retardation that need to be filtered out or remedied through special ed/reeducation, or robust enough against cheating and exploits. and that design decisions have been overtaken by jews so that it has partly become a test to promote jews in society.

in short we need better more comprehensive and impartial intelligence tests that cannot be gamed via studying or battery robot cram schools

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

iirc billionaires don't have the highest IQ.

Billionaires are a product of a lot of things going right for them

Another example is the Royal Family, did nothing of aignificance since 1950 and still have more wealth than thw combined wealth of most Indians.

But if you want to be a premium wagecuck or become a superstar in hard sciences there is no escape apart from being highly intelligent and having a work ethic

 

[looksmaxxed]

The moderm IQ tests such as the WAIS and Stanford-Binet, are frequently updated with input from diverse groups of psychologists and statisticians to reduce cultural, racial, and socioeconomic biases. It is definitely not muh whyte cope. IQ tests were originally developed to identify children who needed extra help in school-not to rank people or determine racial or social superiority.


Also I never said IQ is the end it be all. It just measures specific cognitive skills like problem solving, pattern recognition, and verbal reasoning. These tests are not meant to measure a person's worth, value, or potential in life. In Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences, IQ only measure logical, visual and verbal intelligence.

@wishIwasSalludon @loyolaxavvierretard @Debetro


View attachment 3705425

the updates are being made by jews and niggers, that's the problem.

 

[Saint Casanova]

Actuarial positions depend heavily on quantitative solving, and they pay well in a lot of countries. Even apart from finance if you want to make an impact in academia you need to be atleast 98-99%tile at the minimum. That would correlate to 130 IQ.

Yeah because actuarial sciences is basically applied probability so you’ll need to be good at maths.

Do you think academia is even worthwhile to get into if you’re so intelligent? The rewards are quite poor compared (Unless you are extremely well known) to something like becoming a leader in an industry.

What do you think about medicine and dentistry? What IQ is required ? I think you can manage with slightly above average (110) if you’re a strong worker.

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Yeah because actuarial sciences is basically applied probability so you’ll need to be good at maths.

Do you think academia is even worthwhile to get into if you’re so intelligent? The rewards are quite poor compared (Unless you are extremely well known) to something like becoming a leader in an industry.

What do you think about medicine and dentistry? What IQ is required ? I think you can manage with slightly above average (110) if you’re a strong worker.

Pharmaceutical research needs above average IQ. Same goes for medicine too. It is the same for engineering too. I dunno for dentistry tbh. Academia is worth it for people who are interested in research even though it doesnt pay well because their life goal is to study and understand about their topic more. I am talking about tenure profs btw. But yeah, monetary gain isnt much unless you join a private lab

 

[TheLightOfMyLife]

.

Do you think academia is even worthwhile to get into if you’re so intelligent?

No way that’s worth it unless it is your genuine passion and you are infinitely superior to your peers.

Terrence Tao currently makes about 500k yearly. That’s for someone who is at the absolute top of their field and equivalent to someone like Michael Jordan in rarity.

Meanwhile a random mid level software dev who graduated from a normal public school could be making 200k and working from home on his ass

 

[cute]

Think about it, IQ was created by academically successful white men. Surely they would make a test they know they could excel in compared to other groups.

 

[Saint Casanova]

Pharmaceutical research needs above average IQ. Same goes for medicine too. It is the same for engineering too. I dunno for dentistry tbh. Academia is worth it for people who are interested in research even though it doesnt pay well because their life goal is to study and understand about their topic more. I am talking about tenure profs btw. But yeah, monetary gain isnt much unless you join a private lab

Do you think an individual with average intelligence can get into those fields with a very strong work ethic or no ?

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Do you think an individual with average intelligence can get into those fields with a very strong work ethic or no ?

Very much possible.

 

[Meteor21]

Jews and asians score highest so no

 

[Cleetus Cornfield]

the updates are being made by jews and niggers, that's the problem.

What you said is proving my original theory retard.