iq is just like mbti types

[mogger123]

silly little tests you do for fun that try and make sense of differences between indivduals. they dont stand up to scientific rigour and are largely untrue, however kernels of truth exist within them.

the statement "my tested iq is 130" should be taken as seriously as "im a ESTP"

 

[JackTheKnife]

How much you scored on the online mensa one (I guess you did for the sake of it)

 

[BearBoy]

Hey our avis look similar

 

[apocalypse]

rl summon thread

 

[mogger123]

How much you scored on the online mensa one (I guess you did for the sake of it)

i think i got like mid 130s

 

[mogger123]

Hey our avis look similar

you and ramirez wish they could be this cool

 

[mogger123]

rl summon thread

he's probably in looksmax account registration hell as we speak

 

[JackTheKnife]

i think i got like mid 130s

Same. As expected btw, in my head I knew you're not going to score under 130. What a coincidence, total shock. Nah you're just an intelligent guy and I assumed your'e not going to score low. It's not sucking your dick, it's just about how obvious IQ is.

Not that the online one is totally accurate or some shit, but even so. I also heard people scoring lower on the online one than the actual mensa test.

 

[mogger123]

Same. As expected btw, in my head I knew you're not going to score under 130. What a coincidence, total shock. Nah you're just an intelligent guy and I assumed your'e not going to score low. It's not sucking your dick, it's just about how obvious IQ is.

Not that the online one is totally accurate or some shit, but even so. I also heard people scoring lower on the online one than the actual mensa test.

like i said it's about as meaningful as "im type WXYX so i have a harder time with public speaking"

 

[JackTheKnife]

like i said it's about as meaningful as "im type WXYX so i have a harder time with public speaking"

You don't believe that.

 

[mogger123]

You don't believe that.

yes i do.

 

[LampPostPrime]

You don't believe that.

He doesnt . Typical contrarian .org poster #987

 

[Deleted member 26410]

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/iq-and-society/
"IQ correlates positively with family income, socioeconomic status, school and occupational performance, military training assignments, law-abidingness, healthful habits, illness, and morality."

How will you discredit IQ when it is not the #1 predictor of success?

 

[Deleted member 26410]

He doesnt . Typical contrarian .org poster #987

IQ has been established to be one of the main predictors of success. "IQ doesn't matter" is such a cope lmao.

 

[Interested]

silly little tests you do for fun that try and make sense of differences between indivduals. they dont stand up to scientific rigour and are largely untrue, however kernels of truth exist within them.

the statement "my tested iq is 130" should be taken as seriously as "im a ESTP"

Your avi halo is no more, Over

 

[Deleted member 17578]

 

[Interested]

 

[mogger123]

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/iq-and-society/
"IQ correlates positively with family income, socioeconomic status, school and occupational performance, military training assignments, law-abidingness, healthful habits, illness, and morality."

How will you discredit IQ when it is not the #1 predictor of success?

most of these are circular - test taking ability predicts test taking ability. "scientists" in shock

the rest are only weak correlations because the lowest percentiles are bad at everything. as taleb puts it "if you hit someone on the head with a hammer they arent good at anything". when the bottom percentiles are removed you are left with random noise i.e. zero correlation

 

[Deleted member 31155]

Short, fat, dumb, ethnic and ugly

 

[Deleted member 17578]

This.

Music taste more important than MBTI

 

[Interested]

This.

Music taste more important than MBTI

Don't even know what MTBI means, but I 100% agree

 

[ranierean]

"Scientific rigor" = gay race communism

 

[mogger123]

"Scientific rigor" = gay race communism

saying something doesnt make it true, buddy

 

[ranierean]

saying something doesnt make it true, buddy

Your thread lol

 

[Deleted member 21661]

It's good for trends
I don't care much about it on an individual level

 

[mogger123]

Your thread lol

1.

<em>g</em>, a Statistical Myth

2.

3.

 

[ranierean]

Replies to Taleb

Since people keep asking about this, yes, there are several lengthy replies to Nassim Taleb's anti-IQ piece from January 2019 "IQ Is Largely a Pseudoscientific Swindle". He's a loose cannon, and while this is probably not his conscious goal, the function of his criticism is just to waste knowledgeab

emilkirkegaard.dk

 

[mogger123]

Replies to Taleb

Since people keep asking about this, yes, there are several lengthy replies to Nassim Taleb's anti-IQ piece from January 2019 "IQ Is Largely a Pseudoscientific Swindle". He's a loose cannon, and while this is probably not his conscious goal, the function of his criticism is just to waste knowledgeab

emilkirkegaard.dk

>emil kirkegaard

maybe try posting a source that isnt infamous for being a racist retard

 

[ranierean]

>emil kirkegaard

maybe try posting a source that isnt infamous for being a racist retard

saying something doesnt make it true, buddy

 

[mogger123]

copying me because you cant even come up with your own response, brutal

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Ok but don't you believe that there is a thing called intelligence and also that there are characteristics and traits that are inherent to people's nature?

 

[mogger123]

Ok but don't you believe that there is a thing called intelligence and also that there are characteristics and traits that are inherent to people's nature?

of course, but iq does not measure it

 

[LampPostPrime]

>emil kirkegaard

maybe try posting a source that isnt infamous for being a racist retard

Oh god muh waysism. Yea you're just a butthurt coper low iq ethnic no wonder lmao

 

[jellyfishcel]

of course, but iq does not measure it

It reflects on intelligence close enough though

 

[mogger123]

It reflects on intelligence close enough though

Not really

 

[mogger123]

Oh god muh waysism. Yea you're just a butthurt coper low iq ethnic no wonder lmao

Racism is cringe and for the low intelligence

 

[LampPostPrime]

Racism is cringe and for the low intelligence

Keep coping lmao

 

[LampPostPrime]

It reflects on intelligence close enough though

Let him cope

 

[mogger123]

Keep coping lmao

1. Race is a social construct due to unconcordant clinal variation

2. There is more variation within ancestral populations than between them

3. There is no coherent explanation for evolutionary pressures/changes causing ancient populations to diverge intellectually in such a short span of time

4. Iq is a complete meme of a measurement that doesnt explain shit

 

[jellyfishcel]

Not really

Yes really
If you can combine an athlete's sprint time at 30m, his bench press, some agility tests, etc and aggregate it into a single score I'd be pretty confident in using it roughly as their overall athletic ability

 

[mogger123]

Yes really
If you can combine an athlete's sprint time at 30m, his bench press, some agility tests, etc and aggregate it into a single score I'd be pretty confident in using it roughly as their overall athletic ability

Read up about causal vs exploratory factor analysis

 

[jellyfishcel]

Read up about causal vs exploratory factor analysis

No I don't think I will

 

[mogger123]

No I don't think I will

It addresses exactly what you are talking about

 

[Crusile]

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/iq-and-society/
"IQ correlates positively with family income, socioeconomic status, school and occupational performance, military training assignments, law-abidingness, healthful habits, illness, and morality."

How will you discredit IQ when it is not the #1 predictor of success?

Yes correlations and the positive manifold are what IQ is. IQ test questions were selected based on increasing the positive manifold. IQ denier are aware of such correlations and still choose to deny IQ

why?
1. IQ is predictive through being a result of social class and educational attainment, not "intelligence. No, "IQ" isnt the number one predictor, grade school report card feedback/opinion is a far better predictor.. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X20300679 additionally,

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289608000603#bib16 standardized tests are predictive after removing g

After controlling for social class, IQ negative correlates with income. So-called controls for SES are not proper controls. Social class is more than SES, and how can you control for social class, if IQ is a measure of social class? People of low social class can overcome their status by studying more in school, sure, but that is an exception and i already mentioned that IQ is the result of education.

2. The job performance correlation is p-hacked: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/

3. Income correlates at .20 and wealth correlates at ....... 0.12 (lol)


more fun facts:


4. IQ cant predict mental retardation (in black people lol)

"What this means is that most black people who score below 70 on IQ tests do not have any kind of mental disability."
IQ, invented for identifying mental retardation, fails at detecting mental retardation.


5. IQ can predict current knowledge levels but cant predict learning speed. Indicating that IQ is an approximate of time spent studying/learning, not a measure of intelligence or learning capability. What is intelligence if it doesnt let you "learn faster"? WHAT EXPLAINS THE GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE IF IQ DOESNT INCREASE LEARNING SPEED?!

I accept that there are people who learn extremely fast with foto-graphic memory, but those people are cant accurately be detected by IQ scores, and as stated IQ cant predict learning speed.

THIS (5. ) IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN DEBUNKED

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104160800700012X?fr=RR-2&ref=pdf_download&rr=7d441cb5af5854af

Replies to Taleb

Since people keep asking about this, yes, there are several lengthy replies to Nassim Taleb's anti-IQ piece from January 2019 "IQ Is Largely a Pseudoscientific Swindle". He's a loose cannon, and while this is probably not his conscious goal, the function of his criticism is just to waste knowledgeab

emilkirkegaard.dk

this is the response by an IRL mathematician. lol for the record, no real mathematician has debunked talb or shalizi's "IQ is a statistical myth".

Talb is correct and has never been "debunked". I read a recent (failed) emil debunk where he selected(p-hacked) some nerdic countries that streamline occupation selection through highly g-loaded early childhood test performance, to show a "linear correlation". tldr the correlation is highly dependent on blue/white collar job salaries, proportion of blue collar jobs, the g-loading of standardized tests, and frequency and power of standardized testing in said educational system.

 

[Crusile]

Yes correlations and the positive manifold are what IQ is. IQ test questions were selected based on increasing the positive manifold. IQ denier are aware of such correlations and still choose to deny IQ

why?
1. IQ is predictive through being a result of social class and educational attainment, not "intelligence. No, "IQ" isnt the number one predictor, grade school report card feedback/opinion is a far better predictor.. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X20300679 additionally,

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289608000603#bib16 standardized tests are predictive after removing g

After controlling for social class, IQ negative correlates with income. So-called controls for SES are not proper controls. Social class is more than SES, and how can you control for social class, if IQ is a measure of social class? People of low social class can overcome their status by studying more in school, sure, but that is an exception and i already mentioned that IQ is the result of education.
View attachment 2293162

2. The job performance correlation is p-hacked: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/

3. Income correlates at .20 and wealth correlates at ....... 0.12 (lol)


more fun facts:


4. IQ cant predict mental retardation (in black people lol)

"What this means is that most black people who score below 70 on IQ tests do not have any kind of mental disability."
IQ, invented for identifying mental retardation, fails at detecting mental retardation.


5. IQ can predict current knowledge levels but cant predict learning speed. Indicating that IQ is an approximate of time spent studying/learning, not a measure of intelligence or learning capability. What is intelligence if it doesnt let you "learn faster"? WHAT EXPLAINS THE GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE IF IQ DOESNT INCREASE LEARNING SPEED?!

I accept that there are people who learn extremely fast with foto-graphic memory, but those people are cant accurately be detected by IQ scores, and as stated IQ cant predicting learning speed.

THIS (5. ) IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN DEBUNKED

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104160800700012X?fr=RR-2&ref=pdf_download&rr=7d441cb5af5854af

this is the response by an IRL mathematician. lol for the record, no real mathematician has debunked talb or shalizi's "IQ is a statistical myth".

Talb is correct and has never been "debunked". I read a recent (failed) emil debunk where he selected(p-hacked) some nerdic countries that streamline occupation selection through highly g-loaded early childhood test performance, to show a "linear correlation". tldr the correlation is highly dependent on blue/white collar job salaries, proportion of blue collar jobs, the g-loading of standardized tests, and frequency and power of standardized testing in said educational system.

@LampPostPrime @jellyfishcel

 

[LampPostPrime]

@LampPostPrime @jellyfishcel

You and your alt mogger123 lol

 

[LampPostPrime]

Tl;dr essays of crying and coping lmao

 

[mogger123]

Yes correlations and the positive manifold are what IQ is. IQ test questions were selected based on increasing the positive manifold. IQ denier are aware of such correlations and still choose to deny IQ

why?
1. IQ is predictive through being a result of social class and educational attainment, not "intelligence. No, "IQ" isnt the number one predictor, grade school report card feedback/opinion is a far better predictor.. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X20300679 additionally,

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289608000603#bib16 standardized tests are predictive after removing g

After controlling for social class, IQ negative correlates with income. So-called controls for SES are not proper controls. Social class is more than SES, and how can you control for social class, if IQ is a measure of social class? People of low social class can overcome their status by studying more in school, sure, but that is an exception and i already mentioned that IQ is the result of education.
View attachment 2293162

2. The job performance correlation is p-hacked: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/

3. Income correlates at .20 and wealth correlates at ....... 0.12 (lol)


more fun facts:


4. IQ cant predict mental retardation (in black people lol)

"What this means is that most black people who score below 70 on IQ tests do not have any kind of mental disability."
IQ, invented for identifying mental retardation, fails at detecting mental retardation.


5. IQ can predict current knowledge levels but cant predict learning speed. Indicating that IQ is an approximate of time spent studying/learning, not a measure of intelligence or learning capability. What is intelligence if it doesnt let you "learn faster"? WHAT EXPLAINS THE GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE IF IQ DOESNT INCREASE LEARNING SPEED?!

I accept that there are people who learn extremely fast with foto-graphic memory, but those people are cant accurately be detected by IQ scores, and as stated IQ cant predict learning speed.

THIS (5. ) IS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT THAT HAS NEVER BEEN DEBUNKED

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104160800700012X?fr=RR-2&ref=pdf_download&rr=7d441cb5af5854af

this is the response by an IRL mathematician. lol for the record, no real mathematician has debunked talb or shalizi's "IQ is a statistical myth".

Talb is correct and has never been "debunked". I read a recent (failed) emil debunk where he selected(p-hacked) some nerdic countries that streamline occupation selection through highly g-loaded early childhood test performance, to show a "linear correlation". tldr the correlation is highly dependent on blue/white collar job salaries, proportion of blue collar jobs, the g-loading of standardized tests, and frequency and power of standardized testing in said educational system.

I think you've nailed it with the point that social class + educational attainment somewhat predict these variables and iq has just been reverse engineered to pick up on social class/educational attainment of people

 

[Deleted member 21863]

Cope thread, no ESTP has iq of 130

 

[mogger123]

Tl;dr essays of crying and coping lmao

What a pissweak response, you have been brutally humiliated with well thought out points and don't even address a single one. Pathetic