ihateevb
6'3 nordic chad (will chase with chainsaw)
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2025
- Posts
- 532
- Reputation
- 572
Medial canthus cutting is one of the lowest-IQ interventions in looksmaxing. It tries to brute-force a structural illusion while ignoring the actual determinant of eye aesthetics: lacrimal complex development.
Cutting the medial canthus does not create depth, support, or harmony. It exposes tissue without changing the underlying orbital architecture, often resulting in redness, scarring, and an uncanny “pulled-apart” look that collapses outside of still images.
The eye area is governed by bone, ligament, and soft-tissue integration, not by how open the inner corner is. Well-developed lacrimals provide natural scleral coverage, medial depth, and seamless eye–nose transition. That’s why naturally good eye areas look effortless and surgical ones look try-hard.
You can’t carve your way to good genetics.
Cutting the medial canthus does not create depth, support, or harmony. It exposes tissue without changing the underlying orbital architecture, often resulting in redness, scarring, and an uncanny “pulled-apart” look that collapses outside of still images.
The eye area is governed by bone, ligament, and soft-tissue integration, not by how open the inner corner is. Well-developed lacrimals provide natural scleral coverage, medial depth, and seamless eye–nose transition. That’s why naturally good eye areas look effortless and surgical ones look try-hard.
You can’t carve your way to good genetics.