is 1.84-1.88 fwhr bad?

[xye]

Gandy's is 1.85 and Chico's is 1.87 I believe, and I think that if they had a more compact fwhr they would look much worse. But is it generally unideal

 

[lit]

Gandy's is 1.85 and Chico's is 1.87 I believe, and I think that if they had a more compact fwhr they would look much worse. But is it generally unideal

it's not ideal, but it's not bad either.
below 1.8 is where it can start to be cooked.

 

[xye]

it's not ideal, but it's not bad either.
below 1.8 is where it can start to be cooked.

what's ideal?

 

[lit]

what's ideal?

imo 1.88-2

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Do you have an overly long philtrum, high set eyebrows, long nose?

These are more accurate and informative ways of characterizing your face

 

[xye]

Do you have an overly long philtrum, high set eyebrows, long nose?

These are more accurate and informative ways of characterizing your face

not about me in specific, I was just asking if it detracted from the facial harmony

 

[murlikalo]

mine is 1.89, so it's ideal automatically

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

not about me in specific, I was just asking if it detracted from the facial harmony

No, because its a completely useless measurement