Is .95 MFR bad?

[Deleted member 96813]

It's within the ideal range but on the lower and more masculine end, but is this a positive? 1:1 is obviously the most harmonious but i've heard that the lower end of the ideal range is the most masculine and therefore still great? For instance my IPD is 64mm and my pupil to lip is 67mm resulting in a 0.95 mfr

 

[swan]

its actually closer to .96, and no its not bad

 

[Deleted member 96813]

its actually closer to .96, and no its not bad

ive heard a lot of bp rotters say its optimal as long as ur fwhr is ideal but mines just under 1.9 so ig thats where my problem lies

 

[Magnum Opus]

measuring irl and comparing to ratio ranges derived from pics (obv differ from irl, try it) = certified iqcel sadly

 

[Deleted member 96813]

measuring irl and comparing to ratio ranges derived from pics (obv differ from irl, try it) = certified iqcel sadly

wym, my mfr is .95 measured in the mirror, my philtrum is about 15mm and i have a thin upper lip, im thinking of getting a subnasal lip lift to fix 2 things

1. mfr would go from .95 to .97-.98
2. thin lip with shit shape would become full with a cupid bow

would a 3mm increase in lip height resulting in a 12mm philtrum just make me look worse?