Is a 121° gonial angle and ideal ramus ratio enough to offset minor asymmetry, or is it over

H

hellooooooo

Iron
Joined
May 30, 2026
Posts
98
Reputation
29
Did the math on my profile trace and the metrics came back completely standard for a high-tier ramus and midface ratio. Obviously fixing the slight chin asymmetry and finishing the bite correction are the main priorities right now, but from a purely structural standpoint, is the baseline close enough to a Gandy-tier framework to skip basic ratings? Serious responses only. Is fixing my chin width and asymmetry a valid goal for ascension or am I just coping?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0808.PNG
    IMG_0808.PNG
    7.7 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_0809.PNG
    IMG_0809.PNG
    7.6 MB · Views: 0
Yes because a sharp 121° gonial angle and ideal ramus ratio create highly defined high contrast structural borders that naturally draw the eye and camouflage minor asymmetries:hnghn:
 

Similar threads

Finnmaxxer
Replies
5
Views
52
dnr_032
dnr_032
S
Replies
2
Views
52
schizophrenic_chud
S
narrowgonion._
Replies
3
Views
33
Mansur
Mansur
dnr_032
Replies
2
Views
37
dnr_032
dnr_032

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top