Is a human's life more valuable than an ant's life?

If a amethysts purpose is to be pretty and my purpose is to be moral (as a random example). Is equality determined by being as beautiful as the amethyst or as moral in the same proportion as the amethyst is beautiful?
Are you talking about subjective value or objective value?

Value can ever be only subjective, in the grand scale of things (universal), nothing really is valueable

So since you are human, and humans are social animals, and modt of human interactions are determined by beauty and power

That is why we value other humans (species), beautiful things over ugly things (blackpill), stronger things from weaker ones (bear is more valueable than an ant)

If you are talking about objective value, it is wrong, since only objective value would be if god existed or exists and his existence is only thing of true value since nothing will exist wothout him

But since value is subjective (your cat might have more value to you than 500 prisoners and you would rather let them die than the cat), that means you must look at it from our biological standppint, which is societal - therefore our species are the most important
 

Similar threads

Jan Pol
Replies
15
Views
184
tomm1453
tomm1453
Suimaxxer
Replies
23
Views
146
Suimaxxer
Suimaxxer
HarrierDuBois
Replies
32
Views
463
Saint Casanova
S

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top