Is actual ground warfare portrayed accurately in this scene?

G

Gosick

Luminary
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Posts
6,917
Reputation
10,569






ngl watching this seems pretty questionable. It seems pretty easy to die in warfare like this. Like your entire life goes black after 1 gunshot, and your name just goes down as a casualty recorded while going through something as hellish as this. In the grand scheme of things, it makes you wonder if its worth it.
 
Is this what it will look like once I fire my AK-47 into my classroom?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Tusseleif, Lev Peshkov and Vermilioncore
As a veteran that has participated in war before, yes. We used to battle house by house like this, I still remember killing 3 enemy soldiers in this fashion like it was yesterday.
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: MusicMaxxingMidget, Lev Peshkov and Zygos4Life
As a veteran that has participated in war before, yes. We used to battle house by house like this, I still remember killing 3 enemy soldiers in this fashion like it was yesterday.
1184
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: MusicMaxxingMidget, Lev Peshkov and Alexanderr
Yes ww2, now a days it consists of precise airstrike or aritller followed by a very precise firefight where you're mainly in cover and it probably lasts a few hours or so
 
As a veteran that has participated in war before, yes. We used to battle house by house like this, I still remember killing 3 enemy soldiers in this fashion like it was yesterday.
fckk mirin.

I was looking at some statstics and it shows some strange fucking numbers in regards to casualties/losses. Like theres so much more casualties on one side compared to the other
1594685317327


I guess this pretty much means that theres alot of skill involved in warfare and its just not blindly running out and dying. Going off these stats, it seems that the German WW2 army had much better soldiers then its opponents, I assume WW2 soldiers are much more skillfull then modern day ones.


But nowadays if another war were to break out, it would just be nukes tbh. Kinda lame.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr
Yes ww2, now a days it consists of precise airstrike or aritller followed by a very precise firefight where you're mainly in cover and it probably lasts a few hours or so
damn, so I guess WW2 soldiers were much more hardcore then modern day soldiers then since they have it much easier lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lev Peshkov
damn, so I guess WW2 soldiers were much more hardcore then modern day soldiers then since they have it much easier lol.
Well tbh yes and no. For example if our modern day armies got into a battle it would mog ww2 and ww1 fighting.

As in we haven't had a world war for a lot of time and the amount of precision and hardcore rifleman skills and naval advancements the war would be very very fast paced and most likely as seen on portrayed in the ww2 movies but modern day. But since we've only been fighting towel heads with aks and goats we have ahd it very easy kek
 
looks somewhat real probably
 
It's guerilla warfare on the eastern front, so yes, realistic.
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
27
Views
408
innerlight00
innerlight00
U
Replies
10
Views
383
FoidFumbler
FoidFumbler
Thebuffdon
Replies
336
Views
4K
UWILLNEVERKNOW8
UWILLNEVERKNOW8
MyDreamIsToBe183CM
Replies
106
Views
3K
notalive
N

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top