Is aggressive cutting truly safe during puberty?

0pslsub

0pslsub

True chud
Joined
Apr 30, 2026
Posts
886
Reputation
1,119
Title
@polarpop tagging u cuz I've seen u debate a lot abt ts
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: polarpop, Thief, Vrilltrum and 1 other person
the fuck do you think retard
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: niggerropemaxxer, miserycel and Azi.org
i made that mistake

make sure to stay in maintenace - surplus, even if ur fat
 
Needlessly misconstrued topic, there's nothing wrong with getting leaner, down to 11-15% during puberty, in most cases it'd probably be better for you, getting ridiculously shredded is the issue and I promise you won't accomplish that on accident, additionally you likely won't keep cals low enough to stunt any growth (no reason to eat less than 1800 cal at all)

And DNR the nigga above me, it's not as if taking 10 oreo cookies out of your maintenence is going to leave you multiple inches (shit even centimeters) shorter, maintenance is not even essential
 
  • +1
Reactions: polarpop and jcwkrz
Title
@polarpop tagging u cuz I've seen u debate a lot abt ts
Honestly no, i went on a huge calorie deficit about 1800 kcal when i was 183lbs 5'8 at 15, i did it for about 2 months and got down to 146 pounds. The muscle loss is honestly not worth it you're gonna end up being skinny fat, but facial wise honestly a big glow up. Im 16, 5'11.7 inches now (basically 6ft), i don't think it ruined my growth at all maybe just slowed it minimally then. The only things i felt were horrendous fatigue, and weakness but i started eating normally and lost more so i ended up at 140 lbs after maintaining. Im 163 lbs now, but thats because im using test and going to the gym
 
Last edited:
its safe, if your cut isint prolonged for years then theres no issue with it, only actual studies that show dieting stunting growth in teens are teens who are anorexic, which i would assume your not.

also being fat leads to higher e2 thus growth plates fusing quicker.

a 3 months aggressive cut will do more good then bad, the body will then go under catch up growth to return to height velocity once adequate nutrition is back.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief
Title
@polarpop tagging u cuz I've seen u debate a lot abt ts
It is safe in terms of life or death.

HOWEVER, it is not advised as you will be deficient in a lot of micros. You will also be restricting yourself way too much, leading to less growth and lower testosterone. Don't aggressive cut rn.

If you could mark as solution that would mean a lot (check not thumbs up)
New Solution
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dimorphiq
It is safe in terms of life or death.

HOWEVER, it is not advised as you will be deficient in a lot of micros. You will also be restricting yourself way too much, leading to less growth and lower testosterone. Don't aggressive cut rn.

If you could mark as solution that would mean a lot (check not thumbs up)
View attachment 5526925
less growth in that period of aggressive cutting, test will drop, but the aggressive cut is used to drop fat at a quick rate, a get in get out type thing, 3 months on an overweight person will not do any harm lmao.

ngas would rather stay fat then lose weight
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thief
less growth in that period of aggressive cutting, test will drop, but the aggressive cut is used to drop fat at a quick rate, a get in get out type thing, 3 months on an overweight person will not do any harm lmao.

ngas would rather stay fat then lose weight
He didn't say he is overweight.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dimorphiq, Thief and polarpop
Honestly no, i went on a huge calorie deficit about 1800 kcal when i was 183lbs 5'8 at 15, i did it for about 2 months and got down to 146 pounds. The muscle loss is honestly not worth it you're gonna end up being skinny fat, but facial wise honestly a big glow up. Im 16, 5'11.7 inches now (basically 6ft), i don't think it ruined my growth at all maybe just slowed it minimally then. The only things i felt were horrendous fatigue, and weakness but i started eating normally and lost more so i ended up at 140 lbs after maintaining. Im 163 lbs now, but thats because im using test and going to the gym
You are claiming something rather ridiculous here

Suppose at 183, 5'8 you consumed 0 calories for 8 weeks, we'll give a theoretical maintenence of 2150 sedentary (a fair extrapolation given you claim you were "horrendously fatigued" & "weak"), 2150*60=129,000, assuming a generous flat rate of 3500 calories of energy per lb of fat we end up with 37*129,500
^- Plus If you were eating 1800 cal then you'd have to have made up for 1800*60 calories just to meet that, 108,000, along with 500 calories from the aforementioned remainder, the net negative you are claiming here just to end up "skinny fat" is rather extreme
 
Aggressive cut doing the puberty is absolutely not good, don’t do this mane.

Mark this as solution by clicking the checkmark on the right side
(By any questions my DMs are open)
 

Similar threads

0pslsub
Replies
13
Views
144
Two_Tone_Toney
Two_Tone_Toney
grey10000
Replies
19
Views
167
restinbass
restinbass
pousszz
Replies
5
Views
57
Vodxi
Vodxi
MagicX
Replies
1
Views
52
Zygomatter
Zygomatter
scare7
Replies
2
Views
37
sample
sample

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top