Is beauty objective or subjective?

[RICO]

 

[RICO]

If objective, is it quantifiable?

 

[Part-Time Chad]

Beauty is NOT in the eye of the beholder.

 

[Tusseleif]

Most if not all people find the same facial feautures attractive, just like how most people find traditional classical architectural styles the best. "Beauty is subjective" becomes cope when 90%+ of people like the same stuff

 

[RICO]

If objective, is it quantifiable?

View attachment 1495619View attachment 1495618

 

[MulattoTrenMaxxer]

Also did you post this on /pol/ just saw the same thread there

 

[WhiteGoodman]

Most if not all people find the same facial feautures attractive, just like how most people find traditional classical architectural styles the best

This but I think its like a base of attractiveness and then women have types on top of this, I.e., the shape of the eye is always the same ideal, but colour preference may vary from person to person.

 

[Deleted member 15099]

Its mostly objective

 

[Pumanator]

Hard to say. It's in some degree random since there are different preferences, like phenotype and how much dismorphism is liked. Some prefer more pretty boy and sometime high robust nt Chad. If you let 100 girls rate 100 males who is the best looking they won't point to the same male, but they won't point to 100 different or 50 different either. Prob like 10 males. Also it may differ in different culture.

 

[Nexom]

Both.

 

[Tusseleif]

View attachment 1495620

There’s an Instagram page in my country called architectural rebellion and it gained thousands of followers within days of making and large media attention. People don’t really notice what they like better before someone puts it into focus. For example, huge majority of people would find the classical styles of these buildings much better than the modernist ones. People could sense something was wrong, so when that account was made people started to realize what architectural styles have actually been lost

 

[Exsubhuman]

its like 92% objective