Is being 6’3” overrated or is being 5’11-6 underrated?

Skull and frame wont change where your eyes are set, point with height from side perspective it just appears for you to look smaller and broader frame slightly compensates that problem, you aren't seen as short is sense of small or weak but just of "shorter than him" type of thing. And big skull, meh, if you just have proportional big head that's good but if it's appears that way just because it's narrow or smth like that it's worse.
For example indian PM of UK, had face of 6'2 guy with 5'6 height and that looked funny and haven't helped his case
And 181 cm isn’t short btw
It’s avarage in NL ,the most tallest men’s
 
And 181 cm isn’t short btw
It’s avarage in NL ,the most tallest men’s
It's average in a lot of countries, and that's non frauded estimate, with the rise of height boosters especially among kids, in Europe 6'0 in the streets would be literally average
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
It's average in a lot of countries, and that's non frauded estimate, with the rise of height boosters especially among kids, in Europe 6'0 in the streets would be literally average
If is avarage why don’t look way shorter than a very high height ?190
 
If is avarage why don’t look way shorter than a very high height ?190
190 isn't very high height its literally 15-20% which is taller than average, 5%ish 6'5(195+) is considered "very tall" range
 
190 isn't very high height its literally 15-20% which is taller than average, 5%ish 6'5(195+) is considered "very tall" range
IMG 3506

NBA don’t accept avarage height .
 
View attachment 4436774
NBA don’t accept avarage height .
What is your argument, nba height is ultrafrauded, only sport that frauds it more is WWE. To know true height of every 2000ish players cut of 2-3 inches of their height, and there are a lot of players, even in current nba who are average height(kyle lowry, FVV). Not talking about couple of flukes (5'4 Mougsey Bogues) but literally couple years ago Isaiah Thomas, 5'8 guard averaged 30 and placed 4 in MVP voting
 
What is your argument, nba height is ultrafrauded, only sport that frauds it more is WWE. To know true height of every 2000ish players cut of 2-3 inches of their height, and there are a lot of players, even in current nba who are average height(kyle lowry, FVV). Not talking about couple of flukes (5'4 Mougsey Bogues) but literally couple years ago Isaiah Thomas, 5'7 guard averaged 30 and placed 4 in MVP voting
IMG 3506
Ok small difference still
 
Anglefraud (kemba literally much closer to obviously close camera), difrence is eyes under the chin for kemba if they are standing toe to toe. If thats small for you, well, let it be
Alright, now can you tell me which height is best for aesthetics and health, not in a “mogging” way?


Why are the best models around 6 feet tall?
 
Idk where you get these numbers but I think healthiest height but still aesthetically good is 6'1-6'2, I would consider it the best. And idk where you are getting those numbers most of male models are exactly in the 6'1-6'3 range rarely touching 6'0
Alright, now can you tell me which height is best for aesthetics and health, not in a “mogging” way?


Why are the best models around 6 feet tall?
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
Idk where you get these numbers but I think healthiest height but still aesthetically good is 6'1-6'2, I would consider it the best. And idk where you are getting those numbers most of male models are exactly in the 6'1-6'3 range rarely touching 6'0
Models fraud too their height .
Yes 6'1 is the best I agree .
Can explain why?
 
Models fraud too their height .
Yes 6'1 is the best I agree .
Can explain why?
Yeah but an inch max, I would say 187+- is the best but for safness I'm still softmaxxing on this height
Basically big height usually is associated with different problems however is just "harder to maintain" type of thing, I'm sure medicine in 20 years will allow 6'4 ppl live absolutely fine without any risks associated with height
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
Yeah but an inch max, I would say 187+- is the best but for safness I'm still softmaxxing on this height
Basically big height usually is associated with different problems however is just "harder to maintain" type of thing, I'm sure medicine in 20 years will allow 6'4 ppl live absolutely fine without any risks associated with height
Im 21 years old ,but I had very late puberty ,I can growth more ?
 
Im 21 years old ,but I had very late puberty ,I can growth more ?
"Growth" I'm 99% sure no, but you can strech already existing growth, lurk site for a bit and see heightmaxxing for adults, if you are 5'11 rn, which I assume you are, it's possible you can make 6'0ish (not a promise, but it's a possibility)
 
"Growth" I'm 99% sure no, but you can strech already existing growth, lurk site for a bit and see heightmaxxing for adults, if you are 5'11 rn, which I assume you are, it's possible you can make 6'0ish (not a promise, but it's a possibility)
What if I have open plates ?
 
5'11-6' definitely underrated, its not actually that much of a massive difference compared to 6'3. It just looks larger from your own pov since you're looking from your eye level
 
What if I have open plates ?
I don't think you do, it would be ultrarare at such age. Go check them firstly, even if they are open they are semi open and you maximum could squinch inch of height on some kind of light course
 
5'11-6' definitely underrated, its not actually that much of a massive difference compared to 6'3. It just looks larger from your own pov since you're looking from your eye level
Why incels says that’s is a huge diff?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Miki

Similar threads

whitebitchslayer
Replies
29
Views
523
mirrormogger
mirrormogger
diabolic
Replies
2
Views
111
Romxnus753AC
Romxnus753AC
Dip3shx
Replies
26
Views
353
James47Max
James47Max
S
Replies
148
Views
3K
sub5coper11
S
PsychoDsk
Replies
17
Views
542
jester
jester

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top