New Poster
Krakencel
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2019
- Posts
- 11,272
- Reputation
- 17,394
Every pedo always looks extremely low t and high e
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Teenage girls are not children, therefore any man that is attracted to them cannot be classified as a pedophile. If you disagree, I will send you a link to what the DSM-5 has to say about the issue. Children are prepubescent. Teenage girls are pubescent. Their bodies and minds are very different. You are an agecuckold and nothing more.Yes @John Doe
search up the definition of pedophilialemme guess 17 is crossing the line but 18 is fine?
Necrophillia sounds high tIt's the lowest, then we have everything else at second place (homosexuality, necrophilia, etc)
some dudes on here said they consider 15-16 pedophilic, which is far from truesearch up the definition of pedophilia
It's a spectrum -- with sole attraction to prepubescent kids on one side and maybe being into flat neotonous asians on the otherWhat do you define as pedo? Everyone on this forum has a different definition.
some dudes on here said they consider 15-16 pedophilic, which is far from true
Considering pedos go for prepubescent kids that’s a given. Plus they are always ugly looking guys.Every pedo always looks extremely low t and high e
Would you consider attraction to 14-17 pedophelia?It's a spectrum -- with sole attraction to prepubescent kids on one side and maybe being into flat neotonous asians on the other
I was wondering this the other day. Maybe the reason why we see only ugly looking pedos is because the good looking ones get away with it.Considering pedos go for prepubescent kids that’s a given. Plus they are always ugly looking guys.
Isn't that super weird? There must be research somewhere on the topic, somebody must make a thread about it.Plus they are always ugly looking guys.
Ian Watkins of lostprophets certainly wasn’t ugly but his face is kinda weird. He didn’t get away with it. I think good-looking men can’t be pedos because women throw themselves at them so they can easily pick many hot chicks.I was wondering this the other day. Maybe the reason why we see only ugly looking pedos is because the good looking ones get away with it.
I can't tell if it's just the ugly ones are desperate enough to go for it and the better looking ones just date women, or whether it's that pedo attraction is innately linked to uglinessConsidering pedos go for prepubescent kids that’s a given. Plus they are always ugly looking guys.
It’s definitely weird. Perhaps it’s God’s way of warning us of pedos.Isn't that super weird? There must be research somewhere on the topic, somebody must make a thread about it.
I can't tell if it's just the ugly ones are desperate enough to go for it and the better looking ones just date women, or whether it's that pedo attraction is innately linked to ugliness
See my post.Ian Watkins of lostprophets certainly wasn’t ugly but his face is kinda weird. He didn’t get away with it. I think good-looking men can’t be pedos because women throw themselves at them so they can easily pick many hot chicks.
This is what AI thinks pedos are:What do you define as pedo? Everyone on this forum has a different definition.
It's a spectrum like I saidWould you consider attraction to 14-17 pedophelia?
I’m into thick Asians tbh
I was wondering this the other day. Maybe the reason why we see only ugly looking pedos is because the good looking ones get away with it.
Why?pedos= meaning attraction to PRE PUBESCENT folk, should be shot and BURIED deep beneath the prison exercise field bros![]()
maybe second to being a gay bottom, but then, fags are disproportionaly pedo compared to straights tooEvery pedo always looks extremely low t and high e
This is what AI thinks pedos are:
View attachment 2247381View attachment 2247383View attachment 2247387
Even 13 is fine... 11-12 is probably crossing the line into pedo teresome dudes on here said they consider 15-16 pedophilic, which is far from true
Is this u?