Is being a pedo the lowest t kind of sexuality?

New Poster

New Poster

Krakencel
Joined
Feb 22, 2019
Posts
11,272
Reputation
17,394
Every pedo always looks extremely low t and high e
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard, n0rthface, Deleted member 28904 and 4 others
Yes @John Doe
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 28904
What do you define as pedo? Everyone on this forum has a different definition.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ken
peter pan syndrome and bad puberty are heavily correlated with being a pedo. definitely lowest T next to being a gay bottom
 
  • +1
Reactions: rl⠀
Yes @John Doe
Teenage girls are not children, therefore any man that is attracted to them cannot be classified as a pedophile. If you disagree, I will send you a link to what the DSM-5 has to say about the issue. Children are prepubescent. Teenage girls are pubescent. Their bodies and minds are very different. You are an agecuckold and nothing more.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 26885, Ken, n0rthface and 5 others
It's the lowest, then we have everything else at second place (homosexuality, necrophilia, etc)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard and Deleted member 28904
Ig they target children cus they know they aren't powerful enough to handle a grown woman
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Skywalker
It's not a sexuality it's a mental illness and there's only one sexuality, bisexuality cuz we're all bisexual
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21716, forevermirin, Skywalker and 1 other person
lemme guess 17 is crossing the line but 18 is fine?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, Deleted member 26885, Ken and 3 others
It's the lowest, then we have everything else at second place (homosexuality, necrophilia, etc)
Necrophillia sounds high t
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: JackTheKnife and Deleted member 28896
search up the definition of pedophilia
some dudes on here said they consider 15-16 pedophilic, which is far from true
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ken, OGJBSLAYER, Deleted member 26116 and 2 others
What do you define as pedo? Everyone on this forum has a different definition.
It's a spectrum -- with sole attraction to prepubescent kids on one side and maybe being into flat neotonous asians on the other
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, n0rthface, Deleted member 2100 and 1 other person
some dudes on here said they consider 15-16 pedophilic, which is far from true
1686162901943
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 29155, Skywalker and thickdickdaddy27
Every pedo always looks extremely low t and high e
Considering pedos go for prepubescent kids that’s a given. Plus they are always ugly looking guys.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skywalker and Deleted member 28896
It's a spectrum -- with sole attraction to prepubescent kids on one side and maybe being into flat neotonous asians on the other
Would you consider attraction to 14-17 pedophelia?

I’m into thick Asians tbh
Considering pedos go for prepubescent kids that’s a given. Plus they are always ugly looking guys.
I was wondering this the other day. Maybe the reason why we see only ugly looking pedos is because the good looking ones get away with it.
 
Plus they are always ugly looking guys.
Isn't that super weird? There must be research somewhere on the topic, somebody must make a thread about it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
I was wondering this the other day. Maybe the reason why we see only ugly looking pedos is because the good looking ones get away with it.
Ian Watkins of lostprophets certainly wasn’t ugly but his face is kinda weird. He didn’t get away with it. I think good-looking men can’t be pedos because women throw themselves at them so they can easily pick many hot chicks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rl⠀
Considering pedos go for prepubescent kids that’s a given. Plus they are always ugly looking guys.
I can't tell if it's just the ugly ones are desperate enough to go for it and the better looking ones just date women, or whether it's that pedo attraction is innately linked to ugliness
 
It's also heavily positively correlated with low iq and neurodevelopmental problems in general in criminalistics and psychology, so just lol at jb obsessed weirdos thinking they are being based or superior in any way
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard, n0rthface, Deleted member 21716 and 4 others
Isn't that super weird? There must be research somewhere on the topic, somebody must make a thread about it.
It’s definitely weird. Perhaps it’s God’s way of warning us of pedos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skywalker and Deleted member 28896
I can't tell if it's just the ugly ones are desperate enough to go for it and the better looking ones just date women, or whether it's that pedo attraction is innately linked to ugliness
Ian Watkins of lostprophets certainly wasn’t ugly but his face is kinda weird. He didn’t get away with it. I think good-looking men can’t be pedos because women throw themselves at them so they can easily pick many hot chicks.
See my post.
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: n0rthface, Deleted member 29155, Skywalker and 1 other person
Would you consider attraction to 14-17 pedophelia?

I’m into thick Asians tbh

I was wondering this the other day. Maybe the reason why we see only ugly looking pedos is because the good looking ones get away with it.
It's a spectrum like I said
 
pedos= meaning attraction to PRE PUBESCENT folk, should be shot and BURIED deep beneath the prison exercise field bros :feelskek:

that being said, im out of this thread
 
  • JFL
Reactions: n0rthface
Every pedo always looks extremely low t and high e
maybe second to being a gay bottom, but then, fags are disproportionaly pedo compared to straights too
 

Similar threads

6
Replies
5
Views
70
iblameEDAR
iblameEDAR
Ponyville
Replies
4
Views
68
pony
pony
Askinov
Replies
14
Views
104
D02
D02
NW3Slayer
Replies
5
Views
87
DarkAscender
DarkAscender
T
Replies
9
Views
134
try2beme
try2beme

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top