Is being blonde really that bad?

J

jackthenerd

Mistral
Joined
Jul 24, 2019
Posts
2,116
Reputation
2,729
Ok so lately I've seen a lot of discussions on this. People saying all that matters is having dark features, that's it. Over for blondecels. Being blonde is weak + cucky. Being blonde = subhuman, etc. I've seen this continually regurgitated and stated by @Kingkellz @Sikkunt23 and it's spreading to others too.

I used to think the same thing. After seeing some discussions, just looking around, it seems like dark features really mog everything else. So I did some reserach and searched around, and it does seem like it's somewhat true, until I came across an online dating study. It analyzed 1.8million messages from women aged 25-35 (maybe that's a critique to the study)?

These are the results:

Over


As you can clearly see, if you have black hair, you're completely finished. You're donzo. It's completely over. You're a subhuman. You literally got mogged by fucking baldcels (holy fucking lifefuel for me, @balding17yomanletcel @Mr_Norwood @Baldingman1998 @Britcel

Just doing more research in general on the topic. Coming across other studies, blog posts, articles, disuccions, polls, etc. I came to realize that brown hair just mog everything else ridiculously hard. I've never really seen black hair do well. You actually wanna look like Chico (and have that hair color), you wanna look like Bateman (it's ideal hair color by a ridiuclous amount), you don't wanna look like Burak. @Newone

I remember looking at one of the studies @Kingkellz referenced and I just couldn't buy it. The study above is more valid (since it's online dating based on response rates). The one Kingkellz references was a study done in France where a guy sat in a bar and used different color wigs. Where successrate for black hair wig was 35%, 30% for brown and 27% for blonde. But I can't help to think that it's quite hard to fake a good blonde and brown wig if you're naturally black haired (which the guy probably was). And even despite that, blonde really doesn't get mogged that hard? It's only 27% vs 30, or 35% or whatever the fuck.

What do you guys think? This is obviously supposed to be a discussion, language I'm using is just to spike emotion for shock value, getting engagement and interest.

An obvious problematic thing with the study I referenced is that they didn't control for race. Most ethnics have black hair. Most asians have black hair, most indians have black hair, most blacks have blakd hair, most hispanics have black hair? etc....But holy fucking shit, women must really hate ethnics for black hair having that low performance lmao. What the actual fuck tbh. How many of those ethnics are even in the sample to begin with? Yet it has such a huge contribution, giving black hair subhuman results and performance.

Obviously if you control for race, and only look at whites, and then look at hair color, then yeah, black hair probably doesn't do as badly and might mog.

What made me make this thread is obviously the previous discussions regarding this one site, I also randomly came across a comment where @buflek said that dark-blonde, and dirtyblonde hair mogs really hard. Is he actually right?

I think blonde hair mostly do bad if it's really blonde and really light. Ie in situations where you literally have no eyebrows and no lashes. Then it looks cucky. Being blonde is also seen as youthful, less masculine, etc. An example of this is that blonde hair in adult males really isn't that common (if you remove dirty-blonde, or dark-blonde). You're a kid, you grow up and you have blonde hair growing up, but then it darkens by the time you're an adult. It's mostly only in women it doesn't necessarily darken. This happened to me, now I'm not blonde, and I have thick eyebrows. @Copemaxxing claims he was blonde growing up as well (assuming he wasn't larping and that I' remember correctly and tagging the right guy).

Thoughts? This is the study the data was taken from btw: https://blog.pof.com/2014/01/most-desirable-singles-of-2014/
 
  • +1
Reactions: Feminineboi, Britishlooksmaxxer, hebbewem and 4 others
Depends of the location,blonde halo is very legit here in LA,many guys would kill to be blonde with blue eyes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gosick and Germania
Dn read but I was dirty blond when I was a baby. Gastondn
lol @remembering this jfl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted, jackthenerd and Deleted member 4804
over for my reddish hair I need to dye it asap
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted
thanks for balding kind stranger!
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, Deleted and jackthenerd
Agree that brown hair is the best

Everything else don't care

Colouring is important but not top 3
 
  • +1
Reactions: jackthenerd
dark blonde mogs. i mog all of my mates with darker hair and get approached quite a lot

also look at all the dirty blonde models who these faggots worship and at the same time say that its over if you are blonde (strijd, dicaprio, brad pitt, hemsworth, edlind, barret...list goes on)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted and jackthenerd
Charlie Hunnam pulls off blonde hair quite well.
 
Ok so lately I've seen a lot of discussions on this. People saying all that matters is having dark features, that's it. Over for blondecels. Being blonde is weak + cucky. Being blonde = subhuman, etc. I've seen this continually regurgitated and stated by @Kingkellz @Sikkunt23 and it's spreading to others too.

I used to think the same thing. After seeing some discussions, just looking around, it seems like dark features really mog everything else. So I did some reserach and searched around, and it does seem like it's somewhat true, until I came across an online dating study. It analyzed 1.8million messages from women aged 25-35 (maybe that's a critique to the study)?

These are the results:

View attachment 547839

As you can clearly see, if you have black hair, you're completely finished. You're donzo. It's completely over. You're a subhuman. You literally got mogged by fucking baldcels (holy fucking lifefuel for me, @balding17yomanletcel @Mr_Norwood @Baldingman1998 @Britcel

Just doing more research in general on the topic. Coming across other studies, blog posts, articles, disuccions, polls, etc. I came to realize that brown hair just mog everything else ridiculously hard. I've never really seen black hair do well. You actually wanna look like Chico (and have that hair color), you wanna look like Bateman (it's ideal hair color by a ridiuclous amount), you don't wanna look like Burak. @Newone

I remember looking at one of the studies @Kingkellz referenced and I just couldn't buy it. The study above is more valid (since it's online dating based on response rates). The one Kingkellz references was a study done in France where a guy sat in a bar and used different color wigs. Where successrate for black hair wig was 35%, 30% for brown and 27% for blonde. But I can't help to think that it's quite hard to fake a good blonde and brown wig if you're naturally black haired (which the guy probably was). And even despite that, blonde really doesn't get mogged that hard? It's only 27% vs 30, or 35% or whatever the fuck.

What do you guys think? This is obviously supposed to be a discussion, language I'm using is just to spike emotion for shock value, getting engagement and interest.

An obvious problematic thing with the study I referenced is that they didn't control for race. Most ethnics have black hair. Most asians have black hair, most indians have black hair, most blacks have blakd hair, most hispanics have black hair? etc....But holy fucking shit, women must really hate ethnics for black hair having that low performance lmao. What the actual fuck tbh. How many of those ethnics are even in the sample to begin with? Yet it has such a huge contribution, giving black hair subhuman results and performance.

Obviously if you control for race, and only look at whites, and then look at hair color, then yeah, black hair probably doesn't do as badly and might mog.

What made me make this thread is obviously the previous discussions regarding this one site, I also randomly came across a comment where @buflek said that dark-blonde, and dirtyblonde hair mogs really hard. Is he actually right?

I think blonde hair mostly do bad if it's really blonde and really light. Ie in situations where you literally have no eyebrows and no lashes. Then it looks cucky. Being blonde is also seen as youthful, less masculine, etc. An example of this is that blonde hair in adult males really isn't that common (if you remove dirty-blonde, or dark-blonde). You're a kid, you grow up and you have blonde hair growing up, but then it darkens by the time you're an adult. It's mostly only in women it doesn't necessarily darken. This happened to me, now I'm not blonde, and I have thick eyebrows. @Copemaxxing claims he was blonde growing up as well (assuming he wasn't larping and that I' remember correctly and tagging the right guy).

Thoughts? This is the study the data was taken from btw: https://blog.pof.com/2014/01/most-desirable-singles-of-2014/

Being blonde is bad especially if you have bad bones it makes you look effimate, if you have good bones it doesn't really matter. Dye your hair a darker blond.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jackthenerd, Sikkunt23 and hebbewem
Dn read but I was dirty blond when I was a baby.View attachment 547954
lol @remembering this jfl

Ok so I did tag the right guy was just guessing lol. I remember when you first posted it, really thought it was a larp tbh, maybe that's why it stuck to me and I remembered it. All I remembered was that the name was Cope something, then I guessed it was you. Lifefuel for my memory.

But yeh I was kinda same as you, except I was light blonde growing up. Then at one point in my teens I was dirty blonde, now I'm not even that. And I'm definitely not brownish brown and defniitely not black hair either. But I'm basically baldcel anyways, so it's irrelevant for me.

Agree that brown hair is the best

Everything else don't care

Colouring is important but not top 3

Yeah, brown hair actually mogs ridiculously hard by research I've done. That's what they mean when they say dark features I've noticed. I wonder if dark-blonde /dirty-blonde might be the 2nd best color though, after controlling for race, but not entirely sure. It's hard to know how much I'm under or over ratting black hair. Black hair tend to give other features that tend to do quite well, which is why it's such a hard debate.
 
@jackthenerd

Black hair can halo eyebrows for example

Black eyebrows look thick and badboyish

Blonde eyebrows are thin and hard to see and gay
 
  • +1
Reactions: LeonardoMessi and jackthenerd
14684367 1B2D 4DB6 BFE2 F13C1C20D81D
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: DharkDC, Gosick and Deleted
Blonde mogs everything, fullstop
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gosick
JFL it’s because ethnics usually have black hair. If they were a black haired blue eyed white mogger like Gaston then the statistic would be different. Keep mirin
103075F4 2520 4AEB BF3D 2892F71F882D
 
  • +1
Reactions: magnificentcel, Deleted member 10524, Deleted member 4106 and 7 others
tbh depends where u live. if everyone is blonde its meh, if everyone is dark haired its good
 
  • +1
Reactions: johncruz12345 and jackthenerd
Blonde hair with masculine other features can look amazing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
People saying all that matters is having dark features, that's it. Over for blondecels. Being blonde is weak + cucky. Being blonde = subhuman, etc. I've seen this continually regurgitated and stated by @Kingkellz @Sikkunt23 and it's spreading to others too.
When I said dark features it includes both black and dark brown hair.
If you look at my sex appeal maxxing thread (where I originally stated dark hair/features) I included ppl with both black and dark brown hair.

Also I am referring to people like gandy, bateman, morrone, etc
1595880913735
1595880941759
1595880962723

It's that Med and North Atlantid pheno. Dark hair(balck or brown), thick dark eyebrows, tan skin or dark hair(black or brown), fair skin and blue eyes. These 2 phenos and their respective coloring combos also seem to have the most success on dating apps like Tinder.

So not really for ethnics but I will say even curries or gooks look worse with blonde hair. They should stick to what they naturally have.

Girls are referring to men who "look/appear" dark triad. Therefore dark hair/features becomes of utmost importance.
1595882474439
1595882487421

There's also tons of anecdotal evidence from women claiming they like dark haired rugged looking men.

From Deliciadecus post a while ago

1595882208120


Just for see for yourself
1595882298210
1595882312852

1595882325155
1595882338148

1595882395466
1595882428565


Even on the "love Island" show or whatever its called the dark haired guy slayed waay more than the blonde dude despite the blonde having better bone structure.
1595882606558


Also sylvester stallone and dolph lundgren. Dolph literally has the bone structure and frame of a GIGACHAD yet women still gravitate towards dark haired stallone.
1595882769730


Hollywood also made Lundgren dye his hair black for that show/movie the punisher or something
1595882826133


I believe even Pitt and Dicaprio had some brown/black highlights thrown into their hair before they start filming.

Then about Hemsworth. Ive seen on various womens forums women always pick Momoa over Hemsworth. The biggest difference between them is hair coloring.

From my personal experience too the dark haired guy always outlsay the cuck blonde dudes. Again when I talk about dark haired dudes its usually Caucasian guys NOT the typical gook or dark skinned curry.

So, I sincerely beleive it's over for blondes unless you look like Hemsworth, Pitt, Lannister, or Lundgren.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LeonardoMessi, magnificentcel, Chadlitecel and 1 other person
Also sylvester stallone and dolph lundgren. Dolph literally has the bone structure and frame of a GIGACHAD yet women still gravitate towards dark haired stallone.
That one is taking it waaaaayyy to far
1595883360284
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 5'8manlet and Kingkellz
Its not bad at all tbh, a lot of girls like blonde guys.

brown is better for generic appeal but i see tons of blonde guys with girls.
 
genuinely disgusting if brown hair is at the top for real
 
Just for see for yourself
tbf with that one its just like putting pietro lips on meeks, Its not natural. Pitt with black hair doesnt look better than his natural hair color while obviously someone who usually has black hair will look worse dying it bleach blonde
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kingkellz
also look at all the dirty blonde models who these faggots worship and at the same time say that its over if you are blonde (strijd, dicaprio, brad pitt, hemsworth, edlind, barret...list goes on)
Its ironic how the same people who preach being a prettyboy claim that being blonde is a death sentence because its more feminine. It cant be that they're ethnic can it :feelshmm:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7580, DharkDC and Deleted member 1140
Everything seems reasonable but one thing. There is no way in hell being bald is more attractive than any hair colored hair. Having the hair color of literal shit is better than being bald.
 
  • +1
Reactions: johncruz12345 and Deleted
Being white in general is bad in 2020
 
  • +1
Reactions: LeonardoMessi and Deleted
When I said dark features it includes both black and dark brown hair.
If you look at my sex appeal maxxing thread (where I originally stated dark hair/features) I included ppl with both black and dark brown hair.

Also I am referring to people like gandy, bateman, morrone, etc
View attachment 547989View attachment 547992View attachment 547993
It's that Med and North Atlantid pheno. Dark hair(balck or brown), thick dark eyebrows, tan skin or dark hair(black or brown), fair skin and blue eyes. These 2 phenos and their respective coloring combos also seem to have the most success on dating apps like Tinder.

So not really for ethnics but I will say even curries or gooks look worse with blonde hair. They should stick to what they naturally have.

Girls are referring to men who "look/appear" dark triad. Therefore dark hair/features becomes of utmost importance.
View attachment 548079View attachment 548080
There's also tons of anecdotal evidence from women claiming they like dark haired rugged looking men.

From Deliciadecus post a while ago

View attachment 548057

Just for see for yourself
View attachment 548061View attachment 548063
View attachment 548066View attachment 548067
View attachment 548073View attachment 548074

Even on the "love Island" show or whatever its called the dark haired guy slayed waay more than the blonde dude despite the blonde having better bone structure.
View attachment 548084

Also sylvester stallone and dolph lundgren. Dolph literally has the bone structure and frame of a GIGACHAD yet women still gravitate towards dark haired stallone.
View attachment 548087

Hollywood also made Lundgren dye his hair black for that show/movie the punisher or something
View attachment 548088

I believe even Pitt and Dicaprio had some brown/black highlights thrown into their hair before they start filming.

Then about Hemsworth. Ive seen on various womens forums women always pick Momoa over Hemsworth. The biggest difference between them is hair coloring.

From my personal experience too the dark haired guy always outlsay the cuck blonde dudes. Again when I talk about dark haired dudes its usually Caucasian guys NOT the typical gook or dark skinned curry.

So, I sincerely beleive it's over for blondes unless you look like Hemsworth, Pitt, Lannister, or Lundgren.


Interesting. Regarding your first link, it's really only about personality type. Same exact results have been achieved when adjusting for bone structure only. I agree that some color can convey some personality though, maybe?

Second link, the studentroom thing, imo those aren't valid. People get persuaded by others opinion. It happens on this forum too. People vote, and then comment and write why or whatever the fuck. It has to be completely anonymous without any discussion. Majority guys just shitting on blondes in that thread too (not even women). It's hard for women then to go against the grain and the haystack, and say the opposite.

Third link is literally just a blonde guy justfying his failure in dating blonde women by him being blonde. It's just a blog post by a dude.

In terms of the bleaching of the hair, that it hard to make it look naturally blonde, so it tend to look really bad. Example is Zac Efron.

For the love island example, I agree 100%. That guy is simply too blonde and light. He has no eyebrows or eyelashes. Then it's a pretty significant falio. But in general, it doesn't really seem that being blonde is that big of a falio, maybe a little. With dark-blonde, dirty-blonde, maybe nothing (especially if you only compare vs black hair).

Anyways so what is your response to the other studies though? Those measure ACTIONS, and not words, or someone trying to virtue signal something. Redpillers always say, when dealing with women. Actions not words. Actions. It's the notion that you can't always take what women say completely serious and that action is a better representation. Some studies actually measure action.

Even in one of the studies you forwarded yourself, the wig study where blonde successrate was 27%, brown was 30%, black was 35%. Is it really that "over" for blondes? Again, I'm not denying it is a bit of a falio though, but it depends on how light you are, and what impact being light has on your eyebrows and eyelashes.

Generally though, from everything I've seen. It seems like brown just mogs really hard though.
 
Last edited:
Even in one of the studies you forwarded yourself, blonde successrate was 27%, brown was 30%, black was 35%. Is it really that "over" for blondes? Again, I'm not denying it is a bit of a falio though, but it depends on how light you are, and what impact being light has on your eyebrows and eyelashes.
I can't seem to find the link but iirc among Caucasians where blonde hair is prevalent the women are genetically more predisposed to having lighter hair while men darker.
I don't know how true this is but I do faintly remember reading this.

About the personality link. It's more than personality, they want guys that LOOK and PHYSICALLY APPEAR DARK TRIAD. The actual dark triad personality is just a bonus.
But it is not the love of danger that attracts them but a primitive desire to find a mate who appears mentally strong, confident and physically attractive in order to have healthier children.
Such men have facial features that display the 'Dark Triad' of personality traits - Machiavellianism, narcissism and psychopathy - said research for the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour.
"We examined whether preferences for the Dark Triad personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) in men's faces were related to reproductive success in contemporary women.

Also I don't remember if you already mentioned this study but in case you didn't here it is.
By analyzing data from over 145,000 of their male members (they have 800,000 in total), the site found that men who have brown hair average 10 dates per month, while blonde guys only have around three.

I agree that some color can convey some personality though, maybe?
Yes darker hair = "darker" broody personality. This is not to be used as a cope by gooks or dark skinned curries who also happen to have dakr hair lol. And yes there is more to appearing "dark" than just color alone such as prominent supraorbital ridges, low eyebrows, thin downward pointing lips, etc etc.
But in general, it doesn't really seem that being blonde is that big of a falio, maybe a little
From what I've seen it is a big failo. Unless extremely good looking or status maxxed (high school/college QB etc).
In terms of the bleaching of the hair, that it hard to make it look naturally blonde, so it tend to look really bad. Example is Zac Efron.
Well would you say Dolph looked bad when he dyed completely black? Yes dyeing blonde doesn't always seem to go well which is a failo in itself but what about blondes that dye black (Dolph Lundgren). I think most women would dig the dark haired version of him.
Redpillers always say, when dealing with women. Actions not words. Actions. It's the notion that you can't always take what women say completely serious and that action is a better representation. Some studies actually measure action.
About actions vs words. This wasn't a direct question about dark vs light but the girls in @Sikkunt23 experiment instinctively brought up "dark features" themselves without sikkunt coercing them about dark/light in anyway.
1595885584227

There are more I just didn't screenshot them, @Sikkunt23 can show you more if you want.
I also posted study above based on actions/results instead of words alone. Again assuming you haven't already touched on that study.
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
Reactions: Sikkunt23
I think its jsut harder to be GL with blonde features. Id also say this basically only applies to white women who are around a lot of blonde dudes. Blond Hair makes you a god to ethnics. Latinas especially love blonde dudes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5393, DharkDC and Deleted member 8064
I think its jsut harder to be GL with blonde features. Id also say this basically only applies to white women who are around a lot of blonde dudes. Blond Hair makes you a god to ethnics. Latinas especially love blonde dudes
It is harder to be GL when blonde, but when you are GL with blonde features, you are REALLY GL.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Achilles and Sikkunt23
Cope about the black hair . They just compared ANY GUY with black hair jfl ( means dark Indians , Indians , Asians lol and blacks ) they don’t have enough smv as whites they are obviously gonna do worse . Shit study . They should compare hair colour on white males/ Latinos since they have highest smv . @Kingkellz thoughts ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kingkellz
It is harder to be GL when blonde, but when you are GL with blonde features, you are REALLY GL.
true af. I legit loled at calling stalone better looking than dolph lundgren just due to hair
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8064
Blond Hair, Brown Hair mog
r6zMnM1.gif
 
Ethnic women prefer blonde hair, whereas white women prefer darker hair (In terms of white men)
 
I can't seem to find the link but iirc among Caucasians where blonde hair is prevalent the women are genetically more predisposed to having lighter hair while men darker.
I don't know how true this is but I do faintly remember reading this.
Yeh this is actually so true. This is what I was pointing to in one of my comments. Basically a lot of kids are blonde, but as they get older, men darken a lot, while a lot women stay light blonde. This is why seing a blonde adult male is kind a of "child" or "female" trait.

Mostly what I see from people, and most are dark blonde, or dirty blondes is eyebrows and eye lashes like this: https://www.menshairstylestoday.com/blonde-hairstyles-for-men/ like hemsworth, etc , despite them being dirty blonde,or dark blonde or whatever, they still have dark, black eyebrows and dark eyelashes. Another example is maybe Arvid. Look at his eyebrows, hair color, etc. Is it over for him? This is the most dirty-blonde adult males I see tbh. The super light ones aren't that common.

But even in the link I gave, some are too light and it falio them hard, and generally speaking, blonde have weaker eyebrows, so that's just objectievly true. The question is now though, can ethnic looking turks compete for instance? Do ethnic looking turks with black hair mog dirty blonde europeans? What with white looking turks with black hair? The original study in the OP puts that to question.

Also I don't remember if you already mentioned this study but in case you didn't here it is.

Nah, I haven't mentioned this one. But it seems to be a bit of a stretch. Maybe I'm coping, but 10 dates a month!!?? Most normies are on 0 dates a month. It just seems a bit unlikely but idk dude.

About actions vs words. This wasn't a direct question about dark vs light but the girls in @Sikkunt23 experiment instinctively brought up "dark features" themselves without sikkunt coercing them about dark/light in anyway.
View attachment 548215
There are more I just didn't screenshot them, @Sikkunt23 can show you more if you want.
I also posted study above based on actions/results instead of words alone. Again assuming you haven't already touched on that study.
Yeah I did see this, and women are definitely bringing it up by themselves by a lot nowadays. I'm not saying Sikkunt did this (he absoultely didn't), but sometimes when I see street interviews on youtube. Guys go out during nighttime or the day and asks women what type of guy they like. Say they show a blonde guy, then the girl says that he's not her type. Then the guy literally says "you like the tall dark and handsome" type guys right?" So the interviewer basically puts it in her mouth and consciousness. I think this also clouds judgment a bit. Women are promoted hardcore by media by saying this answer, this is what they're supposed to be attracted to. So they just go with it, because once it is in their mind, they just htink it's lowkey true. Discussion boards have the same issue, once that lines comes up, it's over. That's the context of online dating is better, completely anonymous and it's not on their conscious mind, just their subsonciousness is being tested, and their ACTIONS are being tested with whom they want to meet up with, date, fuck, etc. So it's a bit more valid.

Cope about the black hair . They just compared ANY GUY with black hair jfl ( means dark Indians , Indians , Asians lol and blacks ) they don’t have enough smv as whites they are obviously gonna do worse . Shit study . They should compare hair colour on white males/ Latinos since they have highest smv . @Kingkellz thoughts ?

Yeah, flaw of the study is that it doesn't control for race lol. It just look on hair of users as a whole. To be the most legit they should've looked on ONLY whites, and then looked at their hair color. Another flaw is that the women are 25-35 and that the study is from 2014. Another flaw again is maybe sample size. I saw some things in the study that supposedly had big impacts I'm a bit skeptical to lmao.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sikkunt23
Yeh this is actually so true. This is what I was pointing to in one of my comments. Basically a lot of kids are blonde, but as they get older, men darken a lot, while a lot women stay light blonde. This is why seing a blonde adult male is kind a of "child" or "female" trait.

Mostly what I see from people, and most are dark blonde, or dirty blondes is eyebrows and eye lashes like this: https://www.menshairstylestoday.com/blonde-hairstyles-for-men/ like hemsworth, etc , despite them being dirty blonde,or dark blonde or whatever, they still have dark, black eyebrows and dark eyelashes. Another example is maybe Arvid. Look at his eyebrows, hair color, etc. Is it over for him? This is the most dirty-blonde adult males I see tbh. The super light ones aren't that common.

But even in the link I gave, some are too light and it falio them hard, and generally speaking, blonde have weaker eyebrows, so that's just objectievly true. The question is now though, can ethnic looking turks compete for instance? Do ethnic looking turks with black hair mog dirty blonde europeans? What with white looking turks with black hair? The original study in the OP puts that to question.



Nah, I haven't mentioned this one. But it seems to be a bit of a stretch. Maybe I'm coping, but 10 dates a month!!?? Most normies are on 0 dates a month. It just seems a bit unlikely but idk dude.


Yeah I did see this, and women are definitely bringing it up by themselves by a lot nowadays. I'm not saying Sikkunt did this (he absoultely didn't), but sometimes when I see street interviews on youtube. Guys go out during nighttime or the day and asks women what type of guy they like. Say they show a blonde guy, then the girl says that he's not her type. Then the guy literally says "you like the tall dark and handsome" type guys right?" So the interviewer basically puts it in her mouth and consciousness. I think this also clouds judgment a bit. Women are promoted hardcore by media by saying this answer, this is what they're supposed to be attracted to. So they just go with it, because once it is in their mind, they just htink it's lowkey true. Discussion boards have the same issue, once that lines comes up, it's over. That's the context of online dating is better, completely anonymous and it's not on their conscious mind, just their subsonciousness is being tested, and their ACTIONS are being tested with whom they want to meet up with, date, fuck, etc. So it's a bit more valid.



Yeah, flaw of the study is that it doesn't control for race lol. It just look on hair of users as a whole. To be the most legit they should've looked on ONLY whites, and then looked at their hair color. Another flaw is that the women are 25-35 and that the study is from 2014. Another flaw again is maybe sample size. I saw some things in the study that supposedly had big impacts I'm a bit skeptical to lmao.
dark brown hair + slight tan + light eyes + cucasoid features + pink lips = ideal pheno . anything else is cope
Thoughts ? @Kingkellz @NordicIranian
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kingkellz and Deleted member 8064
dark brown hair + slight tan + light eyes + cucasoid features + pink lips = ideal pheno . anything else is cope
Thoughts ? @Kingkellz @NordicIranian
very accurate. you can have variations on this but this pheno is the baseline ultimate. sadly im missing the slith tan + light eyes everythign else is gucci.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Sikkunt23 and Deleted member 8064
dark brown hair + slight tan + light eyes + cucasoid features + pink lips = ideal pheno . anything else is cope
Thoughts ? @Kingkellz @NordicIranian
Ideal. But I'd put Black hair on fair skin with long eye lashes and thick eyebrows with white features (strong jaw and cheekbones) up there. + off-pink lips.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: johncruz12345 and Sikkunt23
Ideal. But I'd put Black hair on fair skin with long eye lashes and thick eyebrows with white features (strong jaw and cheekbones) up there. + off-pink lips.
1595887923468


Like crisick @Sikkunt23
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Sikkunt23 and aestheticallypleasin
1595888224190


1595888253051

Brown hair like this mogs tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8064
Maybe I'm coping, but 10 dates a month!!?? Most normies are on 0 dates a month. It just seems a bit unlikely but idk dude.
Yeah you're coping ngl lol
I believe they were averaging so it could be more or less.
I don't remember how they defined "date" but in the general sense 10 dates a month is doable. It comes down to scheduling/timing.

I tried it myself on hinge, basically get 2-3 of your matches to meet on separate days of the same week. Friday - Sunday is ideal.
Assuming you get enough matches you can get roughly 8-12 "dates" in a month.
 
Yeah you're coping ngl lol
I believe they were averaging so it could be more or less.
I don't remember how they defined "date" but in the general sense 10 dates a month is doable. It comes down to scheduling/timing.

I tried it myself on hinge, basically get 2-3 of your matches to meet on separate days of the same week. Friday - Sunday is ideal.
Assuming you get enough matches you can get roughly 8-12 "dates" in a month.
Idk dude, they must have been using chads tbh. Doesn't it just sound really unlikely as well? 10 dates for brown, 3 for blonde? There's no way hair color can matter that much if you look at response rate on other studies, the one I linked, use other sources, or the study in France. How well did black hair do? 5 dates? Wasn't even in the study. I think brown hair just mogs really hard in general. Around Nick Bateman is ideal imo. But again, such a stark difference in this study compared to other studies doesn't make sense to me.

Also what about people with black hair, but don't have the eyebrows to back it up? There are some people with black hair with completely lackluster eyebrows. Classic example is that Mike Majlak guy (the guy that's friend with Logan Paul). Logan unironically eyebrow mog him despite being really light blonde.

I've noticed this a lot in asians too, and some other ethnics too. Maybe some hispanics as well. They have black hair, but bad eyebrows, etc.

Do these guys reap any of the benefits for their black hair, like the giga chads with dark features, solid, thick eyebrows and brown/black hair? Or are they as subhuman as the light blondes without eyebrows?
 
Last edited:
Lifefuel for baldcels
 
  • Love it
Reactions: jackthenerd
Everything seems reasonable but one thing. There is no way in hell being bald is more attractive than any hair colored hair. Having the hair color of literal shit is better than being bald.
I’m guessing baldcels do better than ethnics that’s why
 
  • +1
Reactions: jackthenerd

Similar threads

Lingesan Periyaandi
Replies
8
Views
349
HeightPilledum
HeightPilledum
Seth Walsh
Replies
12
Views
220
RAITEIII
RAITEIII
cromagnon
Replies
35
Views
166
wishIwasSalludon
wishIwasSalludon
Gengar
Replies
2
Views
124
Rigged
Rigged
hybobu
Replies
6
Views
119
hybobu
hybobu

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top