mirinnicotine
Iron
- Joined
- May 19, 2026
- Posts
- 204
- Reputation
- 160
apart from all the edgy homophobic shit im starting to genuinely think the lgtbq was invented by feds in order to subvert the masses
my theory
1. gay morality
with lgtbq being established as okay and progressive in society, it allows for another way for masses to be controlled, "being against lgtbq is not okay, your a bad person, blah blah blah" if feds created lgtbq, this would mean they created another way for them to control mass opinion and morality
2. how the feds turned people gay
studies have found that low testorone is linked to being gay, through proccesced food and bad environment you can effectively lower testorone heavily, as a result more gay people. also another bonus is that low t males are more likely to be submissive aka a slave to the government
(source:By comparison, men who were judged to have been ex clusively homosexual through out their lives had an average of about 40 per cent as much testosterone in their blood. Men who were predominantly homosexual but who had inci dental heterosexual experiences had hormone levels about 54 per cent of the heterosexual average.)
3. profit off gay people
by establishing gay people as a community and a niche, now companies are able to market to them as a specific niche. corporations leverage LGBTQ+ visibility to expand their consumer base and improve public image, leading to widespread use of homosexual imagery in advertising.
the LGBTQ+ community’s collective buying power is estimated at nearly $1 trillion in the US in 2017 (has only gone up from than)
4. gay people are way more sexually active than straight people
by turning a mass amount of people gay, and therefore hyper sexuals, you delude them in the lower vices of life and materialism (on the same level of mass entertainment) you also make them more susceptible to std, which therefore makes them dependant on the medical industry
SOURCE:Yes, multiple studies indicate that gay and bisexual men are generally more sexually active and report a higher number of sexual partners than their heterosexual counterparts.
what do yall think?
my theory
1. gay morality
with lgtbq being established as okay and progressive in society, it allows for another way for masses to be controlled, "being against lgtbq is not okay, your a bad person, blah blah blah" if feds created lgtbq, this would mean they created another way for them to control mass opinion and morality
2. how the feds turned people gay
studies have found that low testorone is linked to being gay, through proccesced food and bad environment you can effectively lower testorone heavily, as a result more gay people. also another bonus is that low t males are more likely to be submissive aka a slave to the government
(source:By comparison, men who were judged to have been ex clusively homosexual through out their lives had an average of about 40 per cent as much testosterone in their blood. Men who were predominantly homosexual but who had inci dental heterosexual experiences had hormone levels about 54 per cent of the heterosexual average.)
3. profit off gay people
by establishing gay people as a community and a niche, now companies are able to market to them as a specific niche. corporations leverage LGBTQ+ visibility to expand their consumer base and improve public image, leading to widespread use of homosexual imagery in advertising.
the LGBTQ+ community’s collective buying power is estimated at nearly $1 trillion in the US in 2017 (has only gone up from than)
4. gay people are way more sexually active than straight people
by turning a mass amount of people gay, and therefore hyper sexuals, you delude them in the lower vices of life and materialism (on the same level of mass entertainment) you also make them more susceptible to std, which therefore makes them dependant on the medical industry
SOURCE:Yes, multiple studies indicate that gay and bisexual men are generally more sexually active and report a higher number of sexual partners than their heterosexual counterparts.
what do yall think?