Is candy even unhealthy?

D

Deleted member 80562

Emerald
Joined
Jul 8, 2024
Posts
41,975
Reputation
102,845
Like how much worse for you is candy and sweets than like bread or oatmeal or something?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30959 and NZb6Air
You’ve been lied to by the Jews. “Eat the carbs though”. They just want you eating sugar. Why would eating sugar be better for your strength than strictly animal proteins and fats? Think logically for just a moment ever.
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616, shizuku11111 and Deleted member 80562
You’ve been lied to the Jews. “Eat the carbs though”. They just want you eating sugar. Why would eating sugar be better for your strength than strictly animal proteins and fats? Think logically for just a moment ever.
then what is the source of energy in my body
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616 and Deleted member 80562
Obviously you don’t know what the Randle Cycle is you fucking retard. “We need carbs though”. False.

I didn’t insult you, did I? If I disagree, you will call it Jewish lies
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616 and Deleted member 80562
You’ve been lied to the Jews. “Eat the carbs though”. They just want you eating sugar. Why would eating sugar be better for your strength than strictly animal proteins and fats? Think logically for just a moment ever.
lied to by*
 

Attachments

  • 1727664800983.png
    1727664800983.png
    3.9 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616 and Deleted member 80562
I didn’t insult you, did I? If I disagree, you will call it Jewish lies
I’m unassailable. If you disagree, then you are just incompetent in the field of human physiology. Everything I’m stating is a fact whether you like it or not.

I insulted you because you’re telling people misinformation that carbs are needed. False.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616 and Deleted member 80562
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616 and Deleted member 80562
@Never Get Up If you are eating enough mass to remain at homeostasis without the loss or gain of body mass, why should the Randal Cycle be relevant if your body is going to use all the carbohydrates and fats anyways for achieving homeostasis?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616 and Deleted member 80562
@Never Get Up If you are eating enough mass to remain at homeostasis without the loss or gain of body mass, why should the Randal Cycle be relevant if your body is going to use all the carbohydrates and fats anyways for achieving homeostasis?
That’s false. When you mix carbohydrates and fats, there is a cross inhibition created.

If there is more fat than carbohydrates, the carbohydrates get locked out of the cell and pushed into your blood stream. Sugar is extremely toxic to your cells. Homeostasis occurs when you only consume fat as your energy source to remain at baseline blood glucose levels.

Anytime you consume carbohydrates, you are spiking your blood glucose levels thus damaging your entire body. Basically you’re killing yourself by every bite via carbohydrate.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 70616, Deleted member 80562 and Disrupted Gene
I’m unassailable. If you disagree, then you are just incompetent in the field of human physiology. Everything I’m stating is a fact whether you like it or not.
Bros batman
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 80562

Similar threads

tyl
Replies
10
Views
169
yetlet808
yetlet808
D
Replies
14
Views
331
MaksBobi
MaksBobi
M
Replies
14
Views
172
KYS RETARD COPERS
K
juzkj
Replies
21
Views
236
juzkj
juzkj

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top