Is DuckDuckGo compromised? What is Legal vs Illegal when there's no face?

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

On a few occasions, I would search for nude images of women. Adult women. For writing purposes to stories and characters. And on a few occasions, through DuckDuckGo, they displayed underage models though fully dressed. From what I know. I didn't click it to find out. But regardless, why would that appear under the search term "nude woman?" And this happened a few times. Once I did a search for Jennifer Lawerence's leaked photos and children appeared on the screen in seductive poses. Well, get this, I set up a screen capture program to capture this evidence, and do those same searches...all appropriate now. No underage models are appearing. But when I wasn't using a capture program, inappropriate subjects.

So that has me wondering why is that? DuckDuckGo employs people to monitor for that sort of activity because if they don't, they can be arrested and fined. Esp with Google out there wanting them out of the picture or to sell out as they pushed Fitbit to do. Could DuckDuckGo be compromised?

Another issue I have. I've noticed a few pics on here displaying questionable bodies though no faces. I've seen the trannies, males growing tits and looking identical to underage body parts. Breast growth is breast growth. So a child under 16 developing them compared to a 20-year-old male growing them with estrogen, would look identical. Tits are tits. Same goes for development process.

So how can the public tell the difference if the face isn't revealed? This is disturbing. Pornhub and alike sites had the same problem with identifying what is and isn't underage. Hundreds of clips circulated through there that were inappropriate ages. Yet the public had no idea. This is a problem.

We need to fix this or others can take advantage of such for personal vendetta, political gain, ugh, an employee setting up another employee to get fired or lose the promotion. We live in a dirty nation. And I know from personal experience how far a person's grudge can go. I lost something special because a person of power, and color, didn't like my white privilege. It used rules, manipulated laws against me. And I have a feeling, they did this to other people without lawyers.

 

[tulasdanslos]

Big yikes. I hope this is a copypasta.

 

[Matthias8272]

It showed me "hot teen click," I'm not clicking anything since im still a noob with tor etc, maybe they want to bait people

 

[Deleted member 15099]

Big yikes. I hope this is a copypasta.

all of his posts are

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

Big yikes. I hope this is a copypasta.

I noticed that pattern months ago but assumed it was just my imagination or a glitch on Duck's part. But last week it got on my nerve. I went as far as typing into their search bar, STOP DISPLAYING THIS SHIT. Ugh. Something's wrong with that website. I believe its compromised. Now by who, is the question. I don't care if its law enforcement, federal too, since I have no interest in illegal garbage, I have no worries BUT if this is the bullshit they're doing, it's disturbing. And it's wrong on so many levels. It's like a person that doesn't do drugs and a certain group of people keeps pushing drugs in his face. That should be illegal, right? Yet it keeps happening. I don't want your drugs. Its-that-simple. So I don't know what's going on over there.

I don't want to make Google any more money. That's why I use the Duck service. Google has too much money and power now. We need to deprive them of that source. Stop feeding them. But if this is the bullshit alternative that's offered, i don't know what to do at this point.

I have a TOR browser that I don't use much. I used to use it for trolling purposes and checking for Youtube's shadow-ban patterns. But I have no interest in using it for anything other.

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

It showed me "hot teen click," I'm not clicking anything since im still a noob with tor etc, maybe they want to bait people

Yeah, well our lawmakers allow that because 18 and 19 are legal. So a porn site can display, "YOUNG TEENAGER GANGBANGED BY CONVICTED FELONS." Because the actress is 18, or 19. They can use that in any context that doesn't involve underage content, including larp. This is why we need to upper the age of consent to 20. That way, the porn industry can never again use the word, teen in their clickbaits again. But if we did that, many wealthy people and famous ones would be arrested along with studio executives INCLUDING corps like Playboy and Hustler. Those people are billionaires. Not to mention OnlyFans and porn sites.