is erdafitinib cope?

[iblamesikk]

.

 

[vanetto]

.

yes

 

[vampi]

no it actually works pretty well,

its just that it is expensive and for full effect you need to have a little more then that

 

[vampi]

yes

explain why it is

 

[vanetto]

explain why it is

high phosphate, eye problems, nail issues as side effects, only for it to work for 15–20%

 

[vampi]

high phosphate, eye problems, nail issues as side effects, only for it to work for 15–20%

so you are saying it works for certain people?

that makes it anything but cope

and side effects are a commen thing for everything.

those are pretty tame for what i have seen people have before

 

[vanetto]

so you are saying it works for certain people?

that makes it anything but cope

and side effects are a commen thing for everything.

those are pretty tame for what i have seen people have before

yea it is pretty much cope if it only works for 15%
you got a pretty low chance to be one of them 15%

also, these side effects are not some easy side effects.

risking allat for a 15% chance is pretty dumb imo

 

[vampi]

yea it is pretty much cope if it only works for 15%
you got a pretty low chance to be one of them 15%

also, these side effects are not some easy side effects.

risking allat for a 15% chance is pretty dumb imo

just read trough the yellow list of it.

where did you read it only has effect on 15% of people

 

[vanetto]

just read trough the yellow list of it.

where did you read it only has effect on 15% of people

fda, balversa, TP3T

 

[vampi]

fda, balversa, TP3T

ok you are right,

but imo its still worth a try,

 

[stigmaboy]

lol @vampi imo it's kinda cope if ur banking on that stuff without doing the basics first

like water gym sleep skin hair posture that's ur lifefuel rn

don't get me wrong could be a halo effect down the line but gotta build the foundation y'know

 

[vampi]

lol @vampi imo it's kinda cope if ur banking on that stuff without doing the basics first

like water gym sleep skin hair posture that's ur lifefuel rn

don't get me wrong could be a halo effect down the line but gotta build the foundation y'know

Niggas who dont do the basics first are retatded anyway

 

[vanetto]

ok you are right,

but imo its still worth a try,

Everbody has their own opinion

 

[anthony267]

.

Yes

 

[infrainfra]

yea it is pretty much cope if it only works for 15%
you got a pretty low chance to be one of them 15%

also, these side effects are not some easy side effects.

risking allat for a 15% chance is pretty dumb imo

its in vitro. still the strongest drug on fgfr3 out there besides tyra which is 28k a year

 

[bullethill]

fda, balversa, TP3T

Low iq the 15-20% is the precent of people that have a succsessful cancer treatment because of a fghr mutation. The effect erdafitnib always lowers fghr but lowered fghr doesn’t always reduce cancer size. The effect of erdafitinib happens 100% of the time to fghr3 but 20% of the time the cancer reduced from that effect.

 

[bullethill]

yea it is pretty much cope if it only works for 15%
you got a pretty low chance to be one of them 15%

also, these side effects are not some easy side effects.

risking allat for a 15% chance is pretty dumb imo

Seriously how would you get side effects if the the effect has a 15% chance. The side effecrs are caused by the hit on fghr’s and fghr3 is the one that limits growth rate.

 

[bullethill]

ok you are right,

but imo its still worth it

He is not right the ones hes refering to are the rates cancer reduces from lowerd fghr’s caused by a mutation on fghr which indeed only 15-20% are eligible for that treatment for CANCER. But we dont need to be that because guess what we dont fking have cancer and not using it for cancer. Erda hits fghr’s regardless 100% of the time. And that causes the side effects and the fghr3 limitation causing more growth. And the sentece he said ”all the side effects for - 15-20%” is so low iq a contradicts itself if the medicine had a 15-20% effect rate you wouldnt get side effects if it didint work you and it does not have that it has a 100% rate on fghr

 

[marus]

.

yes

 

[vanetto]

He is not right the ones hes refering to are the rates cancer reduces from lowerd fghr’s caused by a mutation on fghr which indeed only 15-20% are eligible for that treatment for CANCER. But we dont need to be that because guess what we dont fking have cancer and not using it for cancer. Erda hits fghr’s regardless 100% of the time. And that causes the side effects and the fghr3 limitation causing more growth. And the sentece he said ”all the side effects for - 15-20%” is so low iq a contradicts itself if the medicine had a 15-20% effect rate you wouldnt get side effects if it didint work you and it does not have that it has a 100% rate on fghr

gotta be ragebait