Is eugenics the only solution?

D

Deleted member 22210

Iron
Joined
Sep 11, 2022
Posts
52
Reputation
39
Normal man can compete with these genetic gods?
20221223 232045

Images 11

Images 16

Images 3

Images 15

Images 12
 
  • +1
Reactions: elzde95, Deprived and Deleted member 21735
Gene editing>>
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 24777, Deleted member 22210, Deleted member 23017 and 1 other person
roasties, landwhales, sub 5 incels must be removed the pool
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Constantin Denis, TheDragon, elzde95 and 5 others
i suggest gl men genocie
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jigen and Deleted member 22210
Gene editing>>
There's more to phenotypical editing than changing individual genes.

Context and a broader picture are very much needed when engaging with genes or else one can end up with very undesirable results.
 
Stopping genetic diseases is practically impossible because heterozygotes prevail in the population and transmit one recessive gene (responsible for genetic diseases) and they cannot be detected until a homozygote (two recessive genes) is created, i.e. a person with a genetic disease.

If we forbid genetically ill people from reproducing, we won't stop genetic diseases anyway. Even if we could detect and stop it, there is something called balanced polymorphism [recreating recessive genes responsible for genetic diseases every few generations].

And apart from genetic diseases, we will not create an army of perfect people by manipulating genes, because the most outstanding individuals with unique skills are created as a result of mixing genes - by limiting this, we will limit the birth of people with high IQ, etc.
 
Stopping genetic diseases is practically impossible because heterozygotes prevail in the population and transmit one recessive gene (responsible for genetic diseases) and they cannot be detected until a homozygote (two recessive genes) is created, i.e. a person with a genetic disease.

If we forbid genetically ill people from reproducing, we won't stop genetic diseases anyway. Even if we could detect and stop it, there is something called balanced polymorphism [recreating recessive genes responsible for genetic diseases every few generations].

And apart from genetic diseases, we will not create an army of perfect people by manipulating genes, because the most outstanding individuals with unique skills are created as a result of mixing genes - by limiting this, we will limit the birth of people with high IQ, etc.
Shut up subhuman, these individuals who deserve to reproduce and guide the future of humanity
 
Stopping genetic diseases is practically impossible because heterozygotes prevail in the population and transmit one recessive gene (responsible for genetic diseases) and they cannot be detected until a homozygote (two recessive genes) is created, i.e. a person with a genetic disease.

If we forbid genetically ill people from reproducing, we won't stop genetic diseases anyway. Even if we could detect and stop it, there is something called balanced polymorphism [recreating recessive genes responsible for genetic diseases every few generations].

And apart from genetic diseases, we will not create an army of perfect people by manipulating genes, because the most outstanding individuals with unique skills are created as a result of mixing genes - by limiting this, we will limit the birth of people with high IQ, etc.
Eugenics is the future
 
no, just end the welfare and women will go back to men

unless you are lazy as well to support a family
 
no, just end the welfare and women will go back to men

unless you are lazy as well to support a family
Chad fucks, the beta male has the so-called. dead bed - even if he proves that the child is not his, he has to pay alimony. When women are financially dependent on men, it is the worst possible situation for inferior men. It would be much better for them to just jerk off, go to a prostitute or fuck some sex doll. In such a relationship there is no real feeling, no desire - so it's worth nothing. The man only loses on it. He tells himself otherwise to protect his sense of masculinity.

In all societies, in which women are or were oppressed by a tradcuck ruling class were low-status men oppressed even more harshly. Islam, for instance, is not right about women as it promotes literal harems and an inceldom for people whose only option is to blow themselves up to get 72 virgins in heaven. And generally speaking: the vast majority of men had been living in utmost poverty and misery before the workers' movement gained prominence. Mainly because of the workers’ movement was the ruling (and possessing) class eventually forced to share at least a LITTLE bit of their riches. Now the ruling class couldn’t simply rule alone anymore but had to fear strikes and uprisings, since all those without possessions (of factories, real estate, i.e. capital) had begun to organize under independently elected leaders. In their organizations, snitches, shills, concern trolls and the like were quickly removed.
 
Last edited:
I always said: The only hope is inceldias euthanization. Let drago hapily fuck your mother, sister, daughter
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22210
When women are financially dependent on men, it is the worst possible situation for inferior men. It would be much better for them to just jerk off, go to a prostitute or fuck some sex doll.
this would be economic downfall, society needs people like this exactly because they are literal slaves that run the economy. You can still become chad and fuck his wife, so it is benefit for you as well.

Ending welfare gives normies/subhumans a chance to get a women by working hard, now they are just jerking off and offing them from society and a good job.
 
this would be economic downfall, society needs people like this exactly because they are literal slaves that run the economy. You can still become chad and fuck his wife, so it is benefit for you as well.

Ending welfare gives normies/subhumans a chance to get a women by working hard, now they are just jerking off and offing them from society and a good job.
So why don't you go to a country where there is no welfare?
 
no, just end the welfare and women will go back to men

unless you are lazy as well to support a family
women will come back to these men every time:
Images 5
Images 4
Images 6

Not these losers here:
Images 8
Images 10

Images 13
Images 9
 
So why don't you go to a country where there is no welfare?
because I am slaying everywhere, slaying more where there is lower welfare of course, might even do full geomaxxing when i'm old
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22210
correct, but they will marry the losers and they will get sex, at least 3 times a year, maybe just 1, which will fool them to go to work and be economically productive instead of doing nothing like they are now
While these failed men go to work, real men are having sex with the wives of these idiots.
 
who are these genetic cucks? BBC mogs them all and throws a fat load of nigger kids on their feminine faces
 
  • JFL
Reactions: whitegymmax
who are these genetic cucks? BBC mogs them all and throws a fat load of nigger kids on their feminine faces
nobody cares about black people and the bbc, just retarded idiots.
 
who are these genetic cucks? BBC mogs them all and throws a fat load of nigger kids on their feminine faces
no woman would kiss the deformed faces of these niggers
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
6
Views
83
Deleted member 65658
D
humanoidsub7
Replies
0
Views
68
humanoidsub7
humanoidsub7
Alt Number 3
Replies
11
Views
179
dehydrated
dehydrated
S
Replies
3
Views
168
actualunderstander
actualunderstander
D
Replies
12
Views
113
wackedchives
wackedchives

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top