Is Hair considered Frauding?

Mansur

Mansur

Every Cope has an End
Joined
Jul 21, 2024
Posts
1,476
Reputation
1,715
I guess it does compliment ones head shape so it def plays a huge role, however if you were to remove it, this would show your true face pretty much

You can see that sean O pry does have a very good inner face but without his hair he just looks terrible, in his case hair does play a very huge role, without it descending him by multiple points, maybe even as far as Ltn appealwise.

Girls would find him unironically creepy and weird

1000117158


Whereas if we take someone like Freddie Ljungberg, he doesnt need the hair to be a 8+

1000117160


Any thoughts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: theübermenschboy

Is Hair considered Frauding?​

 
  • +1
Reactions: Finncelchud and narceye
yes its a fraud
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
yes its a fraud
Would you go as far as beeing bald is the true look or a buzzcut since it would show your hairline and not make your upper third appear huge?
 
Would you go as far as beeing bald is the true look or a buzzcut since it would show your hairline and not make your upper third appear huge?
ask that to females notice how it woulld be over for them, hair is life with no hair you have no life - Saint Hamudi
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
ask that to females notice how it woulld be over for them, hair is life with no hair you have no life - Saint Hamudi
I tried to show the examples of O pry and Ljungberg, I guess those would be exceptions

Still fascinated how meeks managed to pull it off absolutely with 0 facial hair

no hair brows lashes literally nothing
 
I tried to show the examples of O pry and Ljungberg, I guess those would be exceptions

Still fascinated how meeks managed to pull it off absolutely with 0 facial hair

no hair brows lashes literally nothing
1 in a billion, most guys can't pull off the buzzcut look or the bald look, it looks terrible, brutal genome pill
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
Depends on what you consider a "fraud" and about what are you talking. I mean, if we talk about your whole looks - your whole body and face, then no, its not fraud. If you're talking only about face and facial attractiveness, then yes - it's fraud. This is my take
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
Depends on what you consider a "fraud" and about what are you talking. I mean, if we talk about your whole looks - your whole body and face, then no, its not fraud. If you're talking only about face and facial attractiveness, then yes - it's fraud. This is my take
Im not sure if youre referring to SMV when saying everything

What would you say on this
Would you go as far as beeing bald is the true look or a buzzcut since it would show your hairline and not make your upper third appear huge?
 
Im not sure if youre referring to SMV when saying everything

What would you say on this
Actually its hard, but hair on human is considers by others, as a part of body, thats why if you have big forehead you can grow hair, and style it on your forehead to hide your flaw. But considering short haircut, its still a fraud, because, someone with a buzzcut would be look worse being fully bald.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
Really hard threat, its all about points of views and opinions
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
Actually its hard, but hair on human is considers by others, as a part of body, thats why if you have big forehead you can grow hair, and style it on your forehead to hide your flaw. But considering short haircut, its still a fraud, because, someone with a buzzcut would be look worse being fully bald.

Really hard threat, its all about points of views and opinions
Makes sense, the only thing holding back the is hairline point, bc it determines your third distribution.
 
  • +1
Reactions: pharmaci3t
I guess it does compliment ones head shape so it def plays a huge role, however if you were to remove it, this would show your true face pretty much

You can see that sean O pry does have a very good inner face but without his hair he just looks terrible, in his case hair does play a very huge role, without it descending him by multiple points, maybe even as far as Ltn appealwise.

Girls would find him unironically creepy and weird

View attachment 5444943

Whereas if we take someone like Freddie Ljungberg, he doesnt need the hair to be a 8+

View attachment 5444944

Any thoughts?
In what universe is hair considered frauding? The sewers of New Delhi?

hair quality is a direct reflection of genetic material. It can't turn normie into Chad but it can Chad into normie.

If Freddie Ljungberg, Jason Statham, and Jeremy Meeks got haircuts that suited their faces they could probably push their attractiveness even further. It is just a matter of getting used to things.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur

Similar threads

J
Replies
3
Views
58
jyoungsantos
J
chiefzaallday
Replies
3
Views
104
Molecular67
Molecular67
Z
Replies
12
Views
63
Zruh
Z
6foot3Idc
Replies
1
Views
19
vexd
vexd
Fritter77
Replies
16
Views
146
Fritter77
Fritter77

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →