DoctorLooksmax
IPDcel
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
- Posts
- 11,801
- Reputation
- 22,266
Can you forgive my sins looksmaxxing gods?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Normal IPD is good.
i think it always mogs you just need to have a proportional faceNormal IPD is good.
But if I did have to choose one or the other I’d rather it be too high than too low
what do you class as fine? my ES is high but so is my PFLas long as your es ratio is fine, it doesn't matter much
It looks alright.what do you class as fine? my ES is high but so is my PFL
View attachment 1740760
also I think its the negative canthal tilt making the guy on the right look bad rather than IPD
My ES is about 0.50-0.51 Depending on exactly what pic i try and measure it onIt looks alright.
Width between the canthals of the eye. generally wider is goodwhat's PFL mean
ideal is like .45. Def sub optimal but doesn't look shit to meMy ES is about 0.50-0.51 Depending on exactly what pic i try and measure it on
is this Chad narrow in both?Width between the canthals of the eye. generally wider is good
I thought ideal was 0.46-0.47, tbh probably anything in the 0.44-0.48 range is fine.ideal is like .45. Def sub optimal but doesn't look shit to me
IPD is very narrow, PFL looks okayish but probs below average
Im not sure what the ideal is exactly but it's not over if you have a bad ratio as long as other ratio's minimise the sid from iceage lookI thought ideal was 0.46-0.47, tbh probably anything in the 0.44-0.48 range is fine.
My ES is 0.51 which is subhuman on paper but I think it looks okay because I have 30.8mm PFL- average is 27.2mm