is hypergamy really eugenic?

wishIwasSalludon

wishIwasSalludon

broken but not destroyed
Joined
Nov 9, 2023
Posts
28,285
Reputation
47,688
You may say yes but look into fisherian runaway
1752882061575




female choice often selects for genes which are DETRIMENTAL for survival

we are already seeing this happening now

the rates of single motherhood have skyrocketed because women keep letting themselves get impregnated by low iq low lifes

I dont even have to say any names but you know who Im talking about

1752882140804

1752882171833
1752882190013


1752882322737


another example which one of these men is more optimized for survival?
1752882375633



its obvious I dont even have to explicitly say it

now let me ask another question

which one of these men will women choose?

Fisherian runaway my niggas @Mainlander @imontheloose

ok this is the last time I will tag you guys today I swear
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel, Abdullahm06, superpsycho and 5 others
0
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
Maybe hypergamy will end because of this in the next 100 years
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Maybe hypergamy will end because of this in the next 100 years
Yea

I could see this sort of "fisherian runaway" caused by unchecked hypergamy to be the downfall of alot of liberal societies

we could see a return to more traditional societies where female choice is heavily regulated in a coupled centuries

perhaps even decades
 
  • +1
Reactions: superpsycho and InanimatePragmatist
Sexual selective is quite intricate. It often favours costly traits like bright peacock feathers. Female choice aligns well with symmetrical faces, clear skin, etc. for humans because of the developmental stability and I guess hormone profile to a degree. They’re effectively just good gene-signals.

Physical ruggedness mattered enormously in the Pleistocene; we just don’t survive off that now. Long-term survival and evolutionary fitness has changed its meaning over time.

Fisherian runaway can’t lead to perpetually worse genes although it can contribute at times, sure.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZASlaya and wishIwasSalludon
Sexual selective is quite intricate. It often favours costly traits like bright peacock feathers. Female choice aligns well with symmetrical faces, clear skin, etc. for humans because of the developmental stability and I guess hormone profile to a degree. They’re effectively just good gene-signals.

Physical ruggedness mattered enormously in the Pleistocene; we just don’t survive off that now. Long-term survival and evolutionary fitness has changed its meaning over time.

Fisherian runaway can’t lead to perpetually worse genes although it can contribute at times, sure.
Foids get bred by barely fertile femboys while warriors like me get nothing because of recessed infra orbitals. In nature I would have conquered their pathetic grain sludge farmer circle jerk and on my horse
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Abdullahm06, BeanCelll and wishIwasSalludon
Sentence above doesn't make sense but I'm too lazy
 
You may say yes but look into fisherian runaway
View attachment 3933071



female choice often selects for genes which are DETRIMENTAL for survival

we are already seeing this happening now

the rates of single motherhood have skyrocketed because women keep letting themselves get impregnated by low iq low lifes

I dont even have to say any names but you know who Im talking about

View attachment 3933077
View attachment 3933078View attachment 3933079

View attachment 3933091

another example which one of these men is more optimized for survival?
View attachment 3933093


its obvious I dont even have to explicitly say it

now let me ask another question

which one of these men will women choose?

Fisherian runaway my niggas @Mainlander @imontheloose

ok this is the last time I will tag you guys today I swear
I think we are stepping into a new form of forced evolution.
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Sadly rabbi goldbergstein convinced these foids killing their babies is fine so I can't even eat grapes anymore. Natural selection is dead
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Foids get bred by barely fertile femboys while warriors like me get nothing because of recessed infra orbitals. In nature I would have conquered their pathetic grain sludge farmer circle jerk and on my horse
Complaining to me won’t help. Cool story bro.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
You wish sou were salludon
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Fisherian runaway can’t lead to perpetually worse genes although it can contribute at times, sure.
Well technically what your saying is right it cant lead to perpetually worse genes

but the real meaning of this statement is alot more morbid than you think

it cant lead to perpetually worse genes because eventually it can cause the species to go extinct

take the irish elk for example

Long-term survival and evolutionary fitness has changed its meaning over time.
are women selecting for that fitness?

Are women choosing the most productive men in society? I wouldnt say so alot of female mate choice is dysgenic

I doubt this will lead to an extinction event

but I could see this leading to the downfall of societies which choose not to solve this problem and instead let hypergamy run rampant
 
dont disrepect @Iraniancel he runs this place son
I was just quoting the post for reference. Not even talking to him. Do you think he realized it was a shitpost?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
I have slept 2 times in the last 4 nights
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
I don't need sleep Im truly special
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
I don't like this I'm turning into the new rodeblur
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Abdullahm06 and wishIwasSalludon
Fisherian is irrelevant cause humans can rape
 
  • Love it
Reactions: mrdouchebag
Survival means nothing if it means no reproduction. The vessel of the genes only needs to survive till it reproduces, then it can fuck off. An enduring longlasting vessel that is optimized for survival, but can't reproduce, is essentially useless. Female choice is quite important.

Modern society is structured at such a way that survival is almost guaranteed for almost everyone. Humans have been freed from environmental pressures, they are masters of their own destiny now. Soon, AI, cybernetics and robots will make high IQ and high physical ability irrelevant. No natural born genius would be able to compete with some midwit who has an AI superchip on his brain. And nooone with high physical ability would be able to outcompete Faggotnator 3000 in strength, speed and endurance. It will all be about looks.

But ultimately, who cares? When full dive ultra realistic VR with full sensory input and output becomes available or ultrarealistic sex robots like the ones in Westerworld become available, it's so fucking over for normal mating and reproduction.
 
  • +1
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Ok time to cook this mediocre thread

Ltb gf then another ltb gf

Ltb gf

Fat sub 5 gf

Slayer for sure

But he rejected like every girl

In this vlog

another example which one of these men is more optimized for survival?
1752882375633
which one of these men will women choose?
First one would be called hagrid

And bullied or ignored by everyone

In today’s world
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Debetro, Pento, Abdullahm06 and 3 others
You may say yes but look into fisherian runaway
View attachment 3933071



female choice often selects for genes which are DETRIMENTAL for survival

we are already seeing this happening now

the rates of single motherhood have skyrocketed because women keep letting themselves get impregnated by low iq low lifes

I dont even have to say any names but you know who Im talking about

View attachment 3933077
View attachment 3933078View attachment 3933079

View attachment 3933091

another example which one of these men is more optimized for survival?
View attachment 3933093


its obvious I dont even have to explicitly say it

now let me ask another question

which one of these men will women choose?

Fisherian runaway my niggas @Mainlander @imontheloose

ok this is the last time I will tag you guys today I swear
King the great is ugly and he's videos ARE fake, you could used a better exemple like Damian Kater but ok
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: pfl and wishIwasSalludon
Ok time to cook this mediocre thread


Ltb gf then another ltb gf


Ltb gf


Fat sub 5 gf


Slayer for sure

But he rejected like every girl

In this vlog



First one would be called hagrid

And bullied or ignored by everyone

In today’s world
What a mogger
5013307 4841281 IMG 2728 5013308 4841288 IMG 2730
Compare him to this jfl
Screenshot 2025 07 18 19 02 54 606 comzhiliaoappmusically edit
This is a legit mogger, dated these gigastacys
Kate Upton Images   2025 07 18T213923420
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
King the great is ugly and he's videos ARE fake, you could used a better exemple like Damian Kater but ok
Coping final boss

Yes he’s ugly but women don’t find him ugly that’s all that matters

He is a slayer and would cuck you
 
King the great is ugly and he's videos ARE fake, you could used a better exemple like Damian Kater but ok
OP was trying to make a point about dark triad or whatever

But king is a really nice guy

His entire appeal is being a friendly giant

And he's also the only example there that gets hot girls

No idea what OP is doing
 
Coping final boss

Yes he’s ugly but women don’t find him ugly that’s all that matters

He is a slayer and would cuck you
First, most of his videos are staged. Second, seriously, bro? Is getting Miami hookers a big feat for you? Show me how many Stacys he slays. This guy isn't even a female niche; his audience is completely male. There's not a single foid in his videos.
 
dark triad or whatever
No the point is that women don’t necessarily go for the smartest or most capable men

Just what they view as genetically superior
 
Coping final boss

Yes he’s ugly but women don’t find him ugly that’s all that matters

He is a slayer and would cuck you
Also this nigga Ins't mogging shit
View attachment 3933249
He's like 6'8 his face doesn't matter

First, most of his videos are staged. Second, seriously, bro? Is getting Miami hookers a big feat for you? Show me how many Stacys he slays. This guy isn't even a female niche; his audience is completely male. There's not a single foid in his videos.
It's not a big feat and no stacies correct

But it's way better than what the other guys OP added got

No the point is that women don’t necessarily go for the smartest or most capable men

Just what they view as genetically superior
This isn't a new idea though

Isn't this literally just blackpill

Who thinks jeff bezos or mike tyson mogs brad pitt
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
Moggs nobody, stop dickriding he is facially Subhuman with height halo
Women would choose him over you

That’s all that matters

Whether he’s “facially subhuman” is cope

He is fucking women you can only dream of while you insult him on an incel forum:lul:
 
This isn't a new idea though
The point of the thread is to show that hypergamy isn’t necessarily eugenic you fucking 2025cel:lul:

Did you not read :feelsuhh:
 
Women would choose him over you

That’s all that matters

Whether he’s “facially subhuman” is cope

He is fucking women you can only dream of while you insult him on an incel forum:lul:
Stop arguing over king

Of course his face doesn't matter because 6'8

Let's talk about the topic

The point of the thread is to show that hypergamy isn’t necessarily eugenic you fucking 2025cel:lul:

Did you not read :feelsuhh:
So if it's not based on looks or genes

You're saying it's based on dark triad right

Which brings us back to before
 
  • JFL
Reactions: wishIwasSalludon
With what's perceived to be
 

Similar threads

rustcohle
Replies
3
Views
144
Primalsplit
Primalsplit
asdvek
Replies
17
Views
245
tt6567
T
optimisticzoomer
Replies
11
Views
73
optimisticzoomer
optimisticzoomer
Asiangymmax
Discussion My confession
2
Replies
52
Views
1K
willgotogandyheaven
willgotogandyheaven
The Observant One
Replies
8
Views
313
Primalsplit
Primalsplit

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top