Is IGF-LR3 cope, and if so, why?

asgard

asgard

Iron
Joined
Feb 8, 2026
Posts
106
Reputation
36
I hear a bunch of people saying its cope on dc, although dc isn't always reliable.
 
be the lab rat or forever rot
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: ICL and pheenon
I hear a bunch of people saying its cope on dc, although dc isn't always reliable.
Why would it be cope? It helps maintain muscle and forms muscle fibers
 
I hear a bunch of people saying its cope on dc, although dc isn't always reliable.
Yes, it simply doesn’t produce the results it should, and is overpriced, use AAS (it’s not totally cope but why would u ever choose it)
 
I think in theory it seems amazing and even have a thread called like "whats with the lr3 hate" and i go through why it seems great but it has so many haters that im proba more likely to be wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: asgard
In a study done on young adult mice, a compound responsible for increased secretion of IGF-1 in muscle fibers was administered. There was an average increase of 15% in muscle mass and a 14% increase in strength. When the study was then conducted on adult mice, there was a 27% increase in strength in the injected muscles as compared with non-injected muscles. It was also found to prevent aging of the muscles. Muscle mass and muscle fiber growth were similar to the levels found in young adults. These effects are most likely due to the ability of IGF-1 to activate satellite cells, therefore stimulating muscle rejuvenation (1).
In studies conducted where GH and IGF1 were used together, a greater increase of Lean Body Mass and fat reduction was found than by use with each compound alone (2). Researches also believe that use of testosterone would also increase IGF levels in muscle (3). In a 12 week study on subjects using IGF-1, IGF-1+GH, or GH alone subjects in this study, gained around 3kgs of lean mass, and lost around 2kgs of fat(4) .
The complete human IGF-1 Long R3 IGF-1 is 2-3 times more potent than IGF-1 due to less ability to be made inactive by IGF binding proteins (5) (6).

only studies are done on mice so probably won t do shit bro
 
Because it has worse binding affinity to bone and muscle compared to endogenously produced igf which means its less selective and grows your organs more than muscle/bone
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and asgard
Because it has worse binding affinity to bone and muscle compared to endogenously produced igf which means its less selective and grows your organs more than muscle/bone
so what isn't cope and will rise my igf1, im planning to go on an aggressive cut but obviously i dont want to suppress igf1 because of low calories
 
so what isn't cope and will rise my igf1, im planning to go on an aggressive cut but obviously i dont want to suppress igf1 because of low calories
hgh
 

Similar threads

A
Replies
12
Views
69
ameza
A
N8Ascendz
Replies
3
Views
89
ntstephn
ntstephn
linuxgod
Replies
0
Views
35
linuxgod
linuxgod
treyu12464
Replies
13
Views
61
AtrophicPyra
AtrophicPyra
K
Replies
3
Views
39
murad.89
M

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top