Jagged0
🇺🇦 سيف الإسلام
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2019
- Posts
- 15,050
- Reputation
- 25,534
Discuss
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Most people are 3-4 PSL so being a 6-6.5 PSL after surgery is enoughBoth of them are situations most people get born into, but overall Gl. In theory you can live in a tiny room in a shared house with limited bills whilst wageslaving a dead end job + become ‘rich’.
But most people can’t ascend past 3psl points with all the facial surgeries in the world.
Most people are 3-4 PSL so being a 6-6.5 PSL after surgery is enoughBoth of them are situations most people get born into, but overall Gl. In theory you can live in a tiny room in a shared house with limited bills whilst wageslaving a dead end job + become ‘rich’.
But most people can’t ascend past 3psl points with all the facial surgeries in the world.
10m+ in spendable money, 6psl+what's your definition of rich and gl
So normie to Chad? (4psl -> 6). It gets exponentially harder to improve your looks as you go up, a normie has objectively has no flaws.Most people are 3-4 PSL so being a 6-6.5 PSL after surgery is enough
people have transformed from normie/htn to 6+ psl (amnesia, salludon) with methods that cost less than that amount so I'd say rich (if rich is 10mil+)10m+ in spendable money, 6psl+
In our scale I thought it was the consensus that Normies have flaws, they just don't dominate their face.So normie to Chad? (4psl -> 6). It gets exponentially harder to improve your looks as you go up, a normie has objectively has no flaws.
Fixing flaws is a million times easier than creating halos, goodlookers are born + rarely forged.
7psl I.e 7/8 or 7/10? I don’t see how you can have inferior facial traits and be over a normie. People can compensate for their flaws with other halos I guess, but most pslers rate harshly for good reason.In our scale I thought it was the consensus that Normies have flaws, they just don't dominate their face.
It's 7+ who have no flaws, because when comparing two 7+, you're pretty much just comparing the better of two good features. Meanwhile, comparing sub 7s, and especially sub 5s, you're really just tallying up who has less bad features.
Ah, I was doing /10, I think we agree on things then7psl I.e 7/8 or 7/10? I don’t see how you can have inferior facial traits and be over a normie. People can compensate for their flaws with other halos I guess, but most pslers rate harshly for good reason.