D
Deleted member 20704
Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
- Posts
- 1,484
- Reputation
- 2,379
It would seem that what separates the incel from the normie nowadays isn't so much hardcoded looks but style and NT?
Like obviously you can ascend as Chad even as vanilla as they come, but the major defining elements between the normies and the incels (not gigaugly ones but typical ones) is more akin to lack of style, fashion, NT, social status, etc. Maybe I'm coping or don't know it but......
The big difference between the normies and the incels is maybe style, clothes, NT, attitude, lifestyle, confidence, social presence, etc.?
I see lots of normie guys around my age who have girlfriends or friends or social lives or w/e and I always notice the majority either....
1. Have tattoos (body, arms, neck, legs, etc. usually);
2. Have their own 'style' (hats, bandanas, certain drip/clothing types);
3. Have jewelry like watches, rings, chains;
4. Have piercings like earrings, lip, nose, etc.
5. Have size (either tall or filled out or just 'big' looking AKA they don't look like puny rats cutting muh carbs to look like Slenderman);
6. "Act" differently or have different "swag." Incels are either more meh/laidback and out of it or more explosive, never in-between or usually never. I don't know what it is but you can 'feel' the different presence from incel/normie even if looks are similar in both.
It seems there is no "plain" normie anymore ... Any modern zoomer is fagmaxxed with all the shit AKA clothes/fashion, tats, "NT" hobbies/connections, lots of friends, their own "style" overall like how they specifically act, move, talk, words, etc. Maybe the big difference from most incels to normies isn't hard features? It's not 0.000001 MMs of chin height that draws the line between normfag & inkler?!
Obviously won't make you Chad but perhaps people over-state looks between the boundaries of incel->normie or normie->incel.
Maybe we wrongly believed incel->normie was some huge step up lookswise when it isn't?
Maybe we wrongly assumed 'niche' was some outsider thing to help when 'niche' itself is actually what sets normies apart?
Maybe the only real looks difference is average or hot, AKA there's no major border of looks between most normies & incels?
Maybe for at least 50% of incels that are passably "okay" even if not super-appealing, the difference from normies ISN'T looks?
Like obviously you can ascend as Chad even as vanilla as they come, but the major defining elements between the normies and the incels (not gigaugly ones but typical ones) is more akin to lack of style, fashion, NT, social status, etc. Maybe I'm coping or don't know it but......
The big difference between the normies and the incels is maybe style, clothes, NT, attitude, lifestyle, confidence, social presence, etc.?
I see lots of normie guys around my age who have girlfriends or friends or social lives or w/e and I always notice the majority either....
1. Have tattoos (body, arms, neck, legs, etc. usually);
2. Have their own 'style' (hats, bandanas, certain drip/clothing types);
3. Have jewelry like watches, rings, chains;
4. Have piercings like earrings, lip, nose, etc.
5. Have size (either tall or filled out or just 'big' looking AKA they don't look like puny rats cutting muh carbs to look like Slenderman);
6. "Act" differently or have different "swag." Incels are either more meh/laidback and out of it or more explosive, never in-between or usually never. I don't know what it is but you can 'feel' the different presence from incel/normie even if looks are similar in both.
It seems there is no "plain" normie anymore ... Any modern zoomer is fagmaxxed with all the shit AKA clothes/fashion, tats, "NT" hobbies/connections, lots of friends, their own "style" overall like how they specifically act, move, talk, words, etc. Maybe the big difference from most incels to normies isn't hard features? It's not 0.000001 MMs of chin height that draws the line between normfag & inkler?!
Obviously won't make you Chad but perhaps people over-state looks between the boundaries of incel->normie or normie->incel.
Maybe we wrongly believed incel->normie was some huge step up lookswise when it isn't?
Maybe we wrongly assumed 'niche' was some outsider thing to help when 'niche' itself is actually what sets normies apart?
Maybe the only real looks difference is average or hot, AKA there's no major border of looks between most normies & incels?
Maybe for at least 50% of incels that are passably "okay" even if not super-appealing, the difference from normies ISN'T looks?
Last edited: