Coolcatcastle
current world record holder for highest iq negroid
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2026
- Posts
- 36
- Reputation
- 31
can't figure this out. pls dont dnr bc im gray and think about it.
if you like manly women then you're already attracted to what men look like, but if you like womanly men then you like what women look like but not repelled by the fact it's actually a man. straight men are attracted to female secondary sex characteristics so why would they be attracted to a woman that has male ones. how tf is that not gay? it seems more logical that straight men should be attracted to a man with female ones instead. so how would that even be gay to be attracted to men that look like women? only if you know it's a man, right? but then again, why would that deter your brain from perceiving it as a woman since it already looks like a woman, and the point of sexual attraction is reproduction. if we use that logic, then it's only gay to have sex with men that look like women but not be into them visually. now, let's apply the logic for women that look like men. your brain's goal is reproduction but there are no signs of reproduction in the slightest. but... if you got raped by one? then you would see the genitals which would activate your brain to like it because of the vagina. however, would you even enjoy the sex because the only sign is a vagina? probably not because there are no indicators of fertility... unless you're gay.
so the reasonable conclusion from my line of thinking would be that it's gay to have sex with men that look like women and gay to be visually attracted to women that look like men. but idk what's more gay.
if you like manly women then you're already attracted to what men look like, but if you like womanly men then you like what women look like but not repelled by the fact it's actually a man. straight men are attracted to female secondary sex characteristics so why would they be attracted to a woman that has male ones. how tf is that not gay? it seems more logical that straight men should be attracted to a man with female ones instead. so how would that even be gay to be attracted to men that look like women? only if you know it's a man, right? but then again, why would that deter your brain from perceiving it as a woman since it already looks like a woman, and the point of sexual attraction is reproduction. if we use that logic, then it's only gay to have sex with men that look like women but not be into them visually. now, let's apply the logic for women that look like men. your brain's goal is reproduction but there are no signs of reproduction in the slightest. but... if you got raped by one? then you would see the genitals which would activate your brain to like it because of the vagina. however, would you even enjoy the sex because the only sign is a vagina? probably not because there are no indicators of fertility... unless you're gay.
so the reasonable conclusion from my line of thinking would be that it's gay to have sex with men that look like women and gay to be visually attracted to women that look like men. but idk what's more gay.
