
protomogger9873
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2024
- Posts
- 1,206
- Reputation
- 1,319
Curious moral dilemma I was thinking of.
If you catch your girl cheating on you with another man, it’s not uncommon protocol to beat the guy. But that always made me wonder, why the guy and not the woman?
The guy has plausible deniability (girl lied, didnt mention you, etc.)
But the girl WILLINGLY and KNOWINGLY decided to cheat on you. Thus, aren’t the blame and consequences supposed to be laid unto her?
However, Kantian morality (low test pussy societal moral code) says you should never beat her because beating people is always morally wrong. On the other hand, Shariah law dictates an infidel will be stoned to death. Two different perspectives from societies and cultures around the globe.
I’d like to ask you guys and get your perspective on this topic. Is it okay to beat your girl if you catch her cheating on you?
If you catch your girl cheating on you with another man, it’s not uncommon protocol to beat the guy. But that always made me wonder, why the guy and not the woman?
The guy has plausible deniability (girl lied, didnt mention you, etc.)
But the girl WILLINGLY and KNOWINGLY decided to cheat on you. Thus, aren’t the blame and consequences supposed to be laid unto her?
However, Kantian morality (low test pussy societal moral code) says you should never beat her because beating people is always morally wrong. On the other hand, Shariah law dictates an infidel will be stoned to death. Two different perspectives from societies and cultures around the globe.
I’d like to ask you guys and get your perspective on this topic. Is it okay to beat your girl if you catch her cheating on you?