kenyesianism is basically just state-capitalism. socialism (as per marx' definition) would lead to communism which pragmatically has failed. im definitely opposed to americas corporate crony capitalism, i feel like the nordic model works considerably better (ive lived in scandinavia and the US), but i just feel like the EU has so many irritating beaurocratic trade rules against shit that comes from asia, which is how we get our "illegal" pharma, and reps for smv (the real shit gets outsourced to china anyways)
Lassez faire rules of the game disadvantage someone starting from zero, which most likely is you aswell. Capital multiplies faster than labor.
you have a point but im unsure of the amount of current monopolies in capitalist nations that exist purely because of state-subsidies, but yeah im generally opposed to capitalism in general
Nordic model is more regulatory than the keynesian one
yeah exactly, keynesianism is basically capitalism with post-recession fiscal expansionism for economic stimulation, it otherwise doesnt differ too much from modern capitalism in practice so it would have similar practical strengths and weaknesses
