Is Matthew Noszka’s eye area bad?

Deleted member 3795

Deleted member 3795

Luminary
Joined
Nov 4, 2019
Posts
5,710
Reputation
9,405
F83A1B9E 8F64 431B B9F9 71F69626C339

It looks pretty similar to mine I think.
 
good undereye support, pct and little eyelid exposure. it has all the essentials
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6427, Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 3795 and 1 other person
Very good eye area
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3795
Average
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: needsolution and Deleted member 3795
PSL autists won't consider that a good eye area. His eye area is ideal imo. Looks good without looking alien because of little UEE.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6427 and Deleted member 3795
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3795
His pfl is 26mm so indeed below average but it doesnt matter. He has insane appeal irl and mogs most models.
Yeah tbh, he has a jock phenotype so insane broad IRL appeal.
I have more of a prettyboy twink look.
 
  • +1
Reactions: needsolution
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3795
mogs me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3795
He doesn't have hunter eyes. Yet again proof that lower third + a head of hair = everything. Both of which I lack.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: lookismfugee and Deleted member 3795
p good actually
He doesn't have hunter eyes. Yet again proof that lower third + a head of hair = everything. Both of which I lack.
@balding17yomanletcel
will he or did
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3795

Similar threads

M
Replies
3
Views
33
BunnyLover33
BunnyLover33
inceliusndius
Replies
3
Views
35
inceliusndius
inceliusndius
Ghost Philosophy
Replies
46
Views
115
Throw_Away
T
brotato78
Replies
4
Views
32
kly3
kly3
farfr0m_4dam
Replies
14
Views
103
kisslessvirgin
kisslessvirgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top