Is MMTN above average or average?

[Scandi.]

Extremely important discussion in my dc server rn, im neutral in this, don't flame me.

 

[Hexxon]

Extremely important discussion in my dc server rn, im neutral in this, don't flame me.

imo its a stupid metric and better to use percentiles and what not, realistically a mtn should be average since Mid tier Normie but people dont rate that as average so it just makes it confusing

 

[exkira]

Extremely important discussion in my dc server rn, im neutral in this, don't flame me.

Depends on how you define it.

Many people say the average person is ltn, if so then mtn is above average.

but if you are defining mtn as being the true average, it is obviously average by definition.

what we can all agree on is that an average looking person isnt seen as average by women (hypergamy)

 

[shngstaaaa107]

but if you are defining mtn as being the true average, it is obviously average by definition.

The problem with "true average" is that it will never reflect real life. Nobody outside looks like a 5/10; out of a sample of 10 people, it's incredibly likely that a large percentage will be under 5. I'd bet at your workplace or school or any general area, more people you see when walking around are 4.5 or 4.75, with large flaws, comparatively to 5s or higher.

 

[rares54]

The problem with "true average" is that it will never reflect real life. Nobody outside looks like a 5/10; out of a sample of 10 people, it's incredibly likely that a large percentage will be under 5. I'd bet at your workplace or school or any general area, more people you see when walking around are 4.5 or 4.75, with large flaws, comparatively to 5s or higher.

for some reason i only see htn+ on org , idk why

makes me think everyone is like that until i go outside

 

[exkira]

The problem with "true average" is that it will never reflect real life. Nobody outside looks like a 5/10; out of a sample of 10 people, it's incredibly likely that a large percentage will be under 5. I'd bet at your workplace or school or any general area, more people you see when walking around are 4.5 or 4.75, with large flaws, comparatively to 5s or higher.

exactly, so if the average person is ltn then mtn is above average.

However if you are defining mtn as the average of everyone around it is definitionally average, regardless if women think so.

 

[shngstaaaa107]

for some reason i only see htn+ on org , idk why

makes me think everyone is like that until i go outside

real shit but there's probably some algorithm stuff or smt behind it like htn-cl people on here getting tons of replies and it always gets boosted to the top, or you just subconsciously click on what has higher posts cus why not

 

[kktsk]

holy shit

Middle ≠ Average

Average: "An average is a number representing the central or typical value in a set of data, calculated by summing items and dividing by the total count." or the arithmetic mean.

Middle is the genuine 0.5 or 50%.



Average does not mean the middle of the graph. It means what is most normal after accounting for all terms and numbers. By simple logic, there are more ugly and normal people than there are incredibly attractive, meaning the average shifts towards the left side, or the uglier.

MMTN, the exact middle, or 50%, does not account for populations per rating, like what bell curve shows, it is simply the middle between the list that goes Subhuman, Truecel, LTN, MTN, HTN, CL, Chad.

but why the fuck do we take 2 sigma for ltn and 1 sigma for mtn and htn?

 

[kktsk]

but why the fuck do we take 2 sigma for ltn and 1 sigma for mtn and htn?

Why do we define ltn as "a lot" in the first place?

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

above average

 

[kranerman23123]

it must be my retarded grey mind but I haven't seen a sound explaination to why something called MIDDLE MIDDLE TIER NORMIE should NOT be at the dead center of the normal distribution

Literally the middle of the middle of the normal. But its not in the middle of the normal distribution bro. Make sense?

 

[Meteor21]

whats the solution

Mine

 

[Meteor21]

Literally the middle of the middle of the normal. But its not in the middle of the normal distribution bro. Make sense?

No, because distribution would still be the middle of the middle

 

[kranerman23123]

No, because distribution would still be the middle of the middle

Idk what this means but I was being sarcastic. You have 3 adjectives in MMTN to imply its in the complete middle of looks scale

 

[shngstaaaa107]

View attachment 4910016View attachment 4910019
Why do we define ltn as "a lot" in the first place?

Obviously, because it is rarer to have high/perfect symmetry, ideal facial features, bone structure, etc.