is openly talking about you being on org low inhib?

[danilioqqq]

low inhib or high retard

 

[danilioqqq]

ig it depends on how you look

 

[xela2008]

retarded

 

[Tobaccosmoker]

always gatekeep normies

 

[danilioqqq]

always gatekeep normies

they'd never do anything with it anyways

 

[otterhaspants]

Both

 

[xela2008]

they'd never do anything with it anyways

You're actually retarded lmao.

 

[danilioqqq]

You're actually retarded lmao.

who said Im actually doing it

 

[danilioqqq]

Both

makes sense

 

[xela2008]

who said Im actually doing it

Not saying you've done it but you don't know the consequences

 

[hypernormie]

It's retarded because people shouldn't know you are a sperg that autistically overanalyzes your looks. The point of looking good is to increase your status, openly admitting to being a giga sperg is low status af.

It's like PUA's who tell women their job is to be a PUA. Pure retardation.

Sometimes people pull it off, like many PUA's or our resident Clav but it's not because they are doing something good, it's that they are succeeding in spite of this handicap they have placed on themselves by admitting to their abnormal behavior. And generally you should avoid intentionally handicapping yourself.

 

[danilioqqq]

It's retarded because people shouldn't know you are a sperg that autistically overanalyzes your looks. The point of looking good is to increase your status, openly admitting to being a giga sperg is low status af.

It's like PUA's who tell women their job is to be a PUA. Pure retardation.

Sometimes people pull it off, like many PUA's or our resident Clav but it's not because they are doing something good, it's that they are succeeding in spite of this handicap they have placed on themselves by admitting to their abnormal behavior. And generally you should avoid intentionally handicapping yourself.

I haven't talked about being on org but did sometimes approach the fact of being "interested in facial aesthetics" it never had any negative effects so far. Actually the opposite, they seemed interested tho I do try to not "rate" or anything of that nature IRL. Giving compliments and backing it up with "science" also works great in my experience

 

[svarddre]

I’ve never brought up org but I talked to my old foid coworkers abt bp. Never would date any of them so I didn’t really care at all

 

[arbiter891]

It's retarded because people shouldn't know you are a sperg that autistically overanalyzes your looks. The point of looking good is to increase your status, openly admitting to being a giga sperg is low status af.

It's like PUA's who tell women their job is to be a PUA. Pure retardation.

Sometimes people pull it off, like many PUA's or our resident Clav but it's not because they are doing something good, it's that they are succeeding in spite of this handicap they have placed on themselves by admitting to their abnormal behavior. And generally you should avoid intentionally handicapping yourself.

​

from the 48 laws of power:​

​

Law 3: Conceal Your Intentions.​

Law 30: Make Your Accomplishments Seem Effortless.​

Law 38: Think As You Like But Behave Like Others.​

talking about this stuff is spergy asf. Even if others know the importance of looks they'll act like they don't as well and if u talk to them about it in public in front of others they'll probably throw you under the bus. Always move in silence in private and virtue signal like a normie in public. You gain literally nothing telling people about this stuff, they'll either think you're weird and autistic or you're just giving your enemy the upper hand with new knowledge.

 

[hypernormie]

I haven't talked about being on org but did sometimes approach the fact of being "interested in facial aesthetics" it never had any negative effects so far. Actually the opposite, they seemed interested tho I do try to not "rate" or anything of that nature IRL. Giving compliments and backing it up with "science" also works great in my experience

Well yeah when you frame it that way you are doing it in a socially intelligent way.

This is far different than outright stating you are an org user. Still you cannot actually reveal how deeply you understand these things without using massive amounts of social lubricant and finesse. You are playing with fire.

I sperg out about a ton of obscure topics with women but I do it in a socially intelligent way that completely avoids bringing attention to how deeply I actually care about said topics.

Usually this involves a lot of qualifiers and deflecting/diminishing statements

For example one of my main methods for bringing up counter arguments in discussions with women is by preempting a reference to an extremely obscure study with:

"I came across this article today that said..." or "what a coincidence, I recently stumbled on this article about [insert direct scientific refutation of her point]. I can't remember what exactly it was saying but I can try and find it." (Followed by a feigned attempt at failing to find the article that I have bookmarked in a folder titled "USEFUL STUDIES FOR PROVING FOIDS WRONG." only to miraculously find it a few minutes later while browsing my phone during a different conversational topic.)

If a person is interested in these more obscure topics I usually play a bit back and display slightly less interest than they show until I know how receptive they are to a serious conversation about the topic. It is a mistake to jump into conversations about these things with just anybody. I also usually avoid having these conversations with women I haven't yet slept with. This does a few things. It increases her receptivity to my ideas because I have displayed value by sleeping with her. It reduces her desire to create conflict because she is now invested in the relationship. It completely obliterates her ability to levy the default female refutations of labeling anyone who expresses these ideas as an "incel" or "misogynist" or any such default label she is accustomed to using. She can't call me an incel because I just fucked her and she won't call me a misogynist because I am being nice to her.

I have gotten women and normies to agree with many extremely chuddy beliefs by doing this but it's not something you should be messing around with if you don't have the social intelligence to pull it off.

 

[hypernormie]

​

from the 48 laws of power:​

​

Law 3: Conceal Your Intentions.​

Law 30: Make Your Accomplishments Seem Effortless.​

Law 38: Think As You Like But Behave Like Others.​

talking about this stuff is spergy asf. Even if others know the importance of looks they'll act like they don't as well and if u talk to them about it in public in front of others they'll probably throw you under the bus. Always move in silence in private and virtue signal like a normie in public. You gain literally nothing telling people about this stuff, they'll either think you're weird and autistic or you're just giving your enemy the upper hand with new knowledge.

I will add to this, you should always gauge if the conversation about these topics with the person is useful towards your ends before engage in it.

Even when I bring up these topics with women or normies, it is never done out of a desire to simply indulge my interest. It is always being done for a purpose. Either I am trying to win an argument (purely antagonistic domination towards a social opponent, never for the spergy purpose of proving a point, being right, or a desire for "truth") or set a frame that is favorable to me, or I am trying to convince someone of something that benefits me for them to believe. I do not, and you should not simply treat irl people like .org users, who you can openly converse with about these topics due to shared interest. It is highly unlikely anyone you meet IRL is like this and it is more likely they will treat such topics negatively. With these topics, you should take precautions to discern what the purpose of the conversation is before you engage.

 

[danilioqqq]

Well yeah when you frame it that way you are doing it in a socially intelligent way.

This is far different than outright stating you are an org user. Still you cannot actually reveal how deeply you understand these things without using massive amounts of social lubricant and finesse. You are playing with fire.

I sperg out about a ton of obscure topics with women but I do it in a socially intelligent way that completely avoids bringing attention to how deeply I actually care about said topics.

Usually this involves a lot of qualifiers and deflecting/diminishing statements
View attachment 3988465

For example one of my main methods for bringing up counter arguments in discussions with women is by preempting a reference to an extremely obscure study with:

"I came across this article today that said..." or "what a coincidence, I recently stumbled on this article about [insert direct scientific refutation of her point]. I can't remember what exactly it was saying but I can try and find it." (Followed by a feigned attempt at failing to find the article that I have bookmarked in a folder titled "USEFUL STUDIES FOR PROVING FOIDS WRONG." only to miraculously find it a few minutes later while browsing my phone during a different conversational topic.)

If a person is interested in these more obscure topics I usually play a bit back and display slightly less interest than they show until I know how receptive they are to a serious conversation about the topic. It is a mistake to jump into conversations about these things with just anybody. I also usually avoid having these conversations with women I haven't yet slept with. This does a few things. It increases her receptivity to my ideas because I have displayed value by sleeping with her. It reduces her desire to create conflict because she is now invested in the relationship. It completely obliterates her ability to levy the default female refutations of labeling anyone who expresses these ideas as an "incel" or "misogynist" or any such default label she is accustomed to using. She can't call me an incel because I just fucked her and she won't call me a misogynist because I am being nice to her.

I have gotten women and normies to agree with many extremely chuddy beliefs by doing this but it's not something you should be messing around with if you don't have the social intelligence to pull it off.

high effort
ty

I agree