Is photogenic a thing?

D

Deleted member 10185

Luminary
Joined
Oct 11, 2020
Posts
7,622
Reputation
7,156
I look utter horse shit from photos. 30-40MM distortion make my midface and nose bigger than it is in real life... Im just saying all of this because I got praised by girl today in Irl. She is not ugly girl... Maybe its because my sideprofile moggs my front face.. I dont know.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lolcel and alriodai
photogenic is not looking ugly plus a dslr camera
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7192
Obviously distortion will make you ugly as shit.
Either way, I think some features are more photogenic than others anyways. Some matter more in motion others matter more in pictures.
Obvious example is asymmetry, irl it will not be that bad but in photos it hurts a lot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Need2Ascend, Lolcel, SpearOfOrion and 6 others
yes and if u have an outdated camera it can make u lose worse and how far the camera is away from you
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hozay
Yes and no.
Imo, I look much better in close up pictures. In distanced pics I look like a bloat lord.
It might pronounce flaws(asymmetry), because it's a still picture, but if you're harmonious, it will look better than real life. If the picture is taken the right way.
 
photogenic is not looking ugly plus a dslr camera

My point was that IM nOT photogenic.. I know that it does not mean someone arent ugly.
 
Obviously distortion will make you ugly as shit.
Either way, I think some features are more photogenic than others anyways. Some matter more in motion others matter more in pictures.
Obvious example is asymmetry, irl it will not be that bad but in photos it hurts a lot.
I want to add for all the copers no you don't just look ugly in cameras you are actually ugly irl. Don't use my high iq comments for your cope.
For non copers, take the comment into consideration
 
  • +1
Reactions: Willard
Yes and no. Lens distortion makes even some of the most attractive people look less so. But as prior stated, some features look better in pictures than others. Recession however, never looks good.
 
Good under eye area is crucial for motion and pics
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 110
Yes and no.
Imo, I look much better in close up pictures. In distanced pics I look like a bloat lord.
It might pronounce flaws(asymmetry), because it's a still picture, but if you're harmonious, it will look better than real life. If the picture is taken the right way.

Yeah it depends of face height.. For example if you have small head.. The distortion can help your face to look taller... If you have slightly big midface like me.. It can make it look twice as bigger.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10536
yes it is. photogenic is basically good symmetry. u can be normie and photogenic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SpearOfOrion and Deleted member 110
imo it's two things, not one thing
 
yes it is, my little brother is 7 and looks so fucking good in motion in real life but when taking pictures his face is assymetrical, looks ugly as fuck etc etc... Motion >>> Pictures
 
  • +1
Reactions: SpearOfOrion and Deleted member 10185
Lightning can change you drastically from one photo to the other one
 
Good under eye area is crucial for motion and pics
fax

i look like death on pictures with friends, and i tend to squint aswell so it makes my eye area look like its bulging since no under eye support.
 

Similar threads

AscendBender
Replies
69
Views
983
pharmatropics
pharmatropics
G
Replies
24
Views
431
naturalpilled
naturalpilled
Lightskin Ethnic
Replies
26
Views
837
Sprinkles
Sprinkles
Alexanderr
Replies
31
Views
795
illoan82
I

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top